- 31,397
- 27,687
Then you're in denial. That's all I can say because it sounds like you're disagreeing to disagree. Everything you've said here has been debunked, over and over.
The last thread accepted that crucial argument.
I respectfully disagree.
I wasn't saying anyone said that. I pointed that out just to show that the statement can mean multiple things.Nobody said a Mag 6 earthquake can destroy the entire planet. We said a Mag 6 earthquake can reach the entire planet. If you want to say "he can't destroy it in 1 attack", then Mag 6 earthquakes overtime a long ass time can pull out that effect.
I never argued that Whitebeard could shake the entire planet in a single attack at Magnitude 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 either.You don't know how earthquakes work. Repeated mag 1, 2, 3, 4, and even 5 earthquakes wouldn't cause the damage needed to pull out the destruction of a mag 6 quake unless Whitebeard stood there for dozens to hundreds of years just constantly quaking every second. Even repeated mag 6 quakes would just prolong the time needed for him to do freaking wall level damage to the other side of the planet.
Anybody who agrees with this argument is agreeing for the sake of agreeing or is agreeing out of ignorance.
If the mf is capable of affecting the planet on a scale of destruction accepted in the last thread, he needs no less than Magnitude 6, unless you're saying Whitebeard will constantly quake for hundreds of years until some walls have minor cracks in them.
In the previous thread I never agreed that Whitebeard could affect the entire planet at once.
Wide scale destruction is achievable without shaking the planet in a single attack.All the destroy the world statements imply "wide scale destruction". That's the minimum of that damn argument.
You're looking for needless specifics.
A mag 6 quake is needed. No prolonging of any other damn quake. A mag 5 won't do the damage of a mag 6 quake, much less anything less.
The destroy the world statements support that there will be mag 6 quakes sent by WB.
The statements don't need all that damn context with every piece of support from the range thread pointing towards WIDE SCALE DESTRUCTION.
"Single attack" it doesn't matter. This isn't "pulv the world" that can be split with a timeframe. "Do this effect with earthquakes" does not have a timeframe or "amount of attacks" assumption.
Do you have any other valid arguments other than "it's the only value in this range"?
When it comes to deciding the legitimacy of a feat - especially a feat that has never happened, then I believe examining the specifics of how the "feat" happens is warranted.
We have multiple feats of Whitebeard in combat which depict the energy his outputting as being around Country level. You want to then add onto that that it is possible he is always actually outputting Moon level amounts of energy based on an interpretation of multiple statements for Whitebeard's capabilities. Except we have never seen these capabilities be fulfilled to match that interpretation.
As I stated in my earlier post, this is a big leap in power for an exceptional feat that has never occurred, and none of the characters who scale to Whitebeard/Blackbeard have this level of potency. I do not believe the statements from different mediums (which are essentially just repeating what the manga says) fulfills the criteria of "If incidents of a similar level are repeated consistently over time, they are unlikely to be outliers." These are not separate incidents being mentioned.
To be honest I'm not sure what other arguments you'd expect me to be making. We're discussing something that has never been witnessed on-screen so I can't just point to a specific panel and say "Look, Whitebeard didn't shake the entire planet here". What matters is just whether you think "destroy the world" can only be explained by shaking the entire planet at Magnitude 6 and I don't think that is necessarily the case.
Last edited: