- 19,523
- 17,161
- Thread starter
- #201
Apparently Arc's original points.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
One Piece: Edward Can Shake Stars
- Thread starter Kachon123
- Start date
- Status
- 31,577
- 28,027
I posted this and only one person has responded to it.
- 21,489
- 30,820
- 31,577
- 28,027
@Kachon123; do not rush to close the thread when most of the agreements were in the first page responding to the OP and there's been 2 pages of discussion since then. You're not even giving pinged people a chance to respond if you close the thread in less than an hour.
- 13,329
- 21,298
You can only hold up the thread for so long though. They're free to respond again, that would be best. But, at the moment, the "possibly" compromise is wholly unnecessary given the current staff support for a full rating
- 31,577
- 28,027
A thread being open a bit longer than the minimum 48 hours needed is not a thread being held up.
If Kachon is sure that the staff will still support a full rating, then why close it as soon as possible?
- 19,523
- 17,161
- Thread starter
- #208
I asked if there was a page that states that grace doesn't mean that a thread can be applied if it has the necessary staff approvals after 2 days, and you haven't responded.
From my knowledge, I can apply this in 50 minutes. If I'm wrong, directing me to a page that says this would be helpful. Otherwise, I would appreciate it of you continued arguing for your points if you still have any instead of waiting for people would already voted to respond in less than in hour.
Thanks.
- 13,329
- 21,298
I suppose yeah, though my point on the "possibly" compromise remains the same atm. If things stay this way, I'd be against the compromise
- 21,489
- 30,820
You ain't lie
- 19,523
- 17,161
- Thread starter
- #211
This is funny.
- 31,577
- 28,027
There's no rule saying the thread has to be closed as soon as possible either. Trying to get the thread rushed through while there is still discussion ongoing is a bad look.
I'm glad you're having a laugh.
- 19,523
- 17,161
- Thread starter
- #213
Considering how the last points brought up came from posts a day ago and not a single person has changed their minds, I really don't think this is rushed.
I'll probably apply this in an hour if the already overwhelming staff support doesn't change.
- 21,489
- 30,820
Idk what he wants to discussY’all, the threads been open for barely two days, Damage wanting to discuss it for a little longer isn’t outlandish, it’s not like he’s saying keep it open for weeks on endit’s not the end of the world if the thread takes a couple more days than 2 to wrap up
He send "nobody responded to this"
"This" being your message and him just piggybacking off of it and saying "I'm fine with a possibly"
Me saying "I support a full rating but I'm fine with a possibly" after reading that
And that's it.
We need to wait for an echo chamber of "yeah I'm fine with possiblys"? Or do we need to debunk your valid point? Or do we need to just give him time to pull out more random debunks?
Cause when I said "what are we still talking about", I was hit with "no one responded to this", but views were changed to "fine with possiblies" cause of it
- 31,577
- 28,027
Staff support from staff who mostly haven't seen any of the discussion that has gone on. You really don't think it's worth waiting a day at most for the staff to respond to the pings and confirm their votes before you apply the thread?
- 19,202
- 28,266
don’t ask me what’s to be discussed, I’ve only been loosely following the thread when deceived tells me he’s doing the art of the deal
- 31,577
- 28,027
Also, DemonMitchGodAubin hasn't cast a solid vote yet but he looks like he's leaning towards a disagree.
So that's potentially 3 disagrees to 5 agrees, and most of the agrees haven't seen any of the discussion or responded to the pings to confirm their votes...
You cannot close this thread prematurely.
@DemonGodMitchAubin Sorry for the ping, but can you confirm your stance on this? Full rating? Possibly rating? Disagree with the rating?
So that's potentially 3 disagrees to 5 agrees, and most of the agrees haven't seen any of the discussion or responded to the pings to confirm their votes...
You cannot close this thread prematurely.
@DemonGodMitchAubin Sorry for the ping, but can you confirm your stance on this? Full rating? Possibly rating? Disagree with the rating?
- 19,523
- 17,161
- Thread starter
- #218
Outside of today, I haven't commented on this thread since the day it was posted. Despite tha, I was still able to read the thread while it was going on.
Saying the staff members who've voted haven't looked at the thread since is a baseless assumption.
It's not needed for the reasons KingTempest has said.
- 21,489
- 30,820
Okay.
Here's what we can do then.
Here is the list of evaluating staff who commented prior to your point
@Maverick_Zero_X, @DarkDragonMedeus, @Elizhaa, @LordTracer @ByAsura
Based on this, do your votes change?
Here's what we can do then.
Here is the list of evaluating staff who commented prior to your point
@Maverick_Zero_X, @DarkDragonMedeus, @Elizhaa, @LordTracer @ByAsura
Based on this, do your votes change?
Weren't you just on the possibly side?
- 31,577
- 28,027
I'm "Disagree but can compromise with a Possibly", like how you're "Agree but can compromise with a Possibly".
The_Yellow_Topaz
She/Her- 1,477
- 1,512
Yep, outstanding analysis as always
I disagree with OP FRA;
I have a guess, it's harder to upgrade AP than to upgrade just the range, people will be more hesitant to do so as it's a far more significant upgrade, so to ease things up, they upgrade only the range so it makes AP easier to argue for since it's already accepted as planet level in range, so it's AP should scale, or something of the sorts
Either way, I'm not sure so don't take my word for it
- 4,781
- 7,395
2 of those three points have been refuted. I wouldn't call it outstanding. Only the Tsuru one stands and even then, her saying no place in the world is safe is still not a main point and main support for 10+ other statements.
- 31,633
- 34,653
Possibly seems fine for me.
- 31,577
- 28,027
Thank you for commenting DDM before the gates were slammed shut.
The votes are more balanced now Kachon.
We now have 4 staff who have agreed that a Possibly rating can be used.
The votes are more balanced now Kachon.
We now have 4 staff who have agreed that a Possibly rating can be used.
- 13,329
- 21,298
Would you be fine with a full rating as well or are you strictly agreeing with a "possibly" rating?
- 21,489
- 30,820
And 4 that agree with full ratings atm
- 19,523
- 17,161
- Thread starter
- #227
This is such a weak and flimsy argument.
If it's stated several times across several One Piece media that Whitebeard can effect the entire planet in one way or the other, whether it be destruction or shaking via his vibrations, why would it only be possibly under the reasoning of "lack of feats?"
If the supposed lack of feats is an issue, then why do we rate Mihawk as superior to Shanks
You're literally coming up with stuff just for the sake of disagreeing when this has never been a problem until now.
- 31,577
- 28,027
Noted. I'm fine if it stays open longer so we can get a more decisive outcome. But now that the votes are more balanced I don't think it should be closed the moment 48 hours has passed.
- 43,104
- 37,244
Why not split that down the middle and go for likely?
- 13,329
- 21,298
For what it's worth, my stance remains the same, because genuinely I think the sheer number and consistency of these kinds of statements is too great for me to not agree with the OP on this
- 13,329
- 21,298
You and I both know these functionally mean the same thing in practice
- 19,202
- 28,266
- 43,104
- 37,244
Yeah, but it's settling for a more likely thing due to split staff decisionYou and I both know these functionally mean the same thing in practice
- 4,781
- 7,395
I count 2 of them who were disagreeing. Damage and Duedates. Did I miss someone?
- 21,489
- 30,820
So what's the exact tally for
A. Who agrees
B. Who disagrees
C. Who's for possibly
Cause now I see a bunch of "I'm fine with A but I'll take B" and trying to use that against votes for C.
A. Who agrees
B. Who disagrees
C. Who's for possibly
Cause now I see a bunch of "I'm fine with A but I'll take B" and trying to use that against votes for C.
- 4,781
- 7,395
Agrees: KingTempest, Maverick_zero, Dalesean027, marvel_champion_07, DDM, Clover, Elizhaa, LordTracer
Disagrees: Mitch, Damage
Possiblies: DDM (Initial agree), Damage (leaning on disagree), Duedate
Last edited:
- 15,592
- 22,894
I'm still fine with a full rating.
- Status
Similar threads
