- 580
- 60
Agree
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m assuming soCan this be applied?
Thank you for responding.I think a possibly rating, at least, is fine. I'm not sure about a full rating.
48 hours have passed? KT is well within his rights to close it.Are you joking? Closing the thread was not appropriate at that time.
48 hours isn't a time limit for how long a thread can stay open for. It's to give people an opportunity to see the thread. KT should have known better than to singlehandedly close the thread after both he and I pinged for more staff comments. If KT was the one to request that the thread stay open longer, then I would have allowed it because there's no rush. Kachon knew exactly what he was doing by threatening to close the thread "in an hour" after I called for staff to vote and he said "I hope they vote in time" as if the thread couldn't be left open longer to allow for their posts.48 hours have passed? KT is well within his rights to close it.
Fair point, I was just looking for clarification from the staff who had already voted.Technically, I'd already voted, but that's besides the point I guess.
Why did you bother pinging them if you didn't want to see if they'd respond?When did we start waiting for every staff member who voted to restate the same shit from before?
So we gotta wait for everybody to come back and state their vote just for this to be processed?
Why did you bother pinging them if you didn't want to see if they'd respond?
#1 I pinged them because you were so butthurt that people weren't coming back to read that 1 point and change their viewWhy did you bother pinging them if you didn't want to see if they'd respond?
Yes, and I pinged them because I wanted them to confirm. Turns out that there is a majority of staff voting now who accept a Possibly rating for the thread, so was it wrong for me to have wanted to wait for their response?Weren’t you doing this first and then he just followed suit?
That removed the nuance I’ve mentioned before. Multiple are fine with a possibly, but that’s about it (only some strictly agree with that).Yes, and I pinged them because I wanted them to confirm. Turns out that there is a majority of staff voting now who accept a Possibly rating for the thread, so was it wrong for me to have wanted to wait for their response?
there already is, its 4 iircThere should be specifications on the likes of how much of a voting differential is needed in the case of there being staff that agree with both sides (like maybe a differential of 2 or 3 for instance).
There are now equal votes for the Possibly rating for it.Can this be closed? It's been like 17 hours since @Damage3245 pinged Tracer and Elizhaa and there is no sign of them responding yet.
The overall staff still support the OP, and the changes have already been applied. I'm not sure why this got reopened in the first place.
Would you like to type out the tally?There are now equal votes for the Possibly rating for it.
some are agree but can compromise for a possibly, thoughThere are now equal votes for the Possibly rating for it.
Voting for full rating: Elizhaa, Maverick, LordTracer, KingTempestWould you like to type out the tally?
DDM did message me.DDM hasn’t elaborated on whether or not he still supports a full rating (which I did ask him about). And the votes are currently pretty balanced. So no, we should wait
I'm not overlooking that.My point still stands, given KT, Maverick, and Elizhaa’s current support for a full rating