- 2,485
- 309
Again, Nasuverse =/= FF and I don't get why FF standards would apply here when the two works are very different.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ishtar shoots a concept of Venus, which is unquantifiable. There's zero indication of it destroying a planet.JBennett said:To be fair Mat I do agree that visuals are just as important as the text. If this was any other situaltion I would agree with this feat. The problem with useing this calc is that NP are crystilation of Legends of the Servant their connected to. Ishtar's NP is planet level due to it being base on the legend of her throwing Venus into the planet and destroying a mountain.
That's for Gil and Enkidu though. and they both have EX Rank NP.JBennett said:Wasn't it stated by Shalmat( The devine Prostitue) that the clash between Gil and Enkidu caused the world to be destroyed and restored seven time?
Never said this. I said that they are not mutually exclusive. You can use both, not exclude one side completely. Please don't distort my arguments.RegisNex1232 said:Either way, Matthew is essentially saying that author input in the form of NP descriptions doesn't matter as visuals are enogh, when that has been repeatedly shown to not be the case.
And also Odin's feat of sealing Surtr in the False Sun.Matthew Schroeder said:Surtr is at least Star level seeing as he consumed Fenris who could devour the sun.
When there's nothing to support it, then no, they should not be used as that leads (and already has) to taking things like Gil's Enuma Elish in CCC at face value when the text does not support it.Matthew Schroeder said:They should be allowed until they're proven to be just for show.
yea, I'd check in BL later. info I got is mostly from youtube playthrough video. And it hasn't gone futher from Chapter 1 :lol:RegisNex1232 said:Arjuna first appeared in FGO in 2015 as part of the promotion for the game. They then used him in Extella as he was popular with the fans. If you could tell me more, I might be able to find out on BL.
You know what NP that cannot be attack-animated? Karl der Grosse and Charlemagnes's Carolus Patricius. Its some kind of flying fortress at the size of city that serves as Karl and Charl's headquarters. In Charl's case, he allows his Carolus Partricius to be used by you (his Master) cuz Nero's Rome was surrounded by all sides by Karl's agressors.RegisNex1232 said:I don't mind attack animations as long as the text supports it, otherwise they're just there for the game and not really relevant.
Yeah, that's true. because we don't even know of CP's rank.RegisNex1232 said:I mean even Karna's VS has some false assumptions so that too is getting revised. Either way, it has no direct relation to Pashupata so no point bringing it up here. Same goes for Karl's NP.
The authors are the ones actually making and writing the Nasuverse. You are asking us to discard their info, which is the only info we get, for your own false assumptions. I'm pretty sure that is against the wiki rules. Again, unsupported visuals, which you still haven't supported, do not make for accurate ratings and so should not be taken over canon text from the character's creator.Matthew Schroeder said:Regis, the author doesn't matter that much. We can use both text and visuals, how hard is it to understand? You are going contrary to the wiki as a whole and ignoring all opinions which are not yours.