Root changes and possible High 1-A upgrade

[Tarang123]

Uminekos H1-b is literally due to an infinite hierarchy, each step having an r>f over the last. same scenario here.
also unlike uminekos, there's a "primordial" concept at the top, making it a l1-a hierarchy.

No? None of the scans you posted imply anything remotely close to an "infinite hierarchy". Whereas, Umineko's R>F stuff is pretty blatant

 

[Iiliminal]

omg close this

 

[BestMGQScalerEver]

I feel like there might be a discussion rule made against this if this is tried again lmfao.

 

[Theoretical]

"This should mean"

Show us high 1B hierarchy in Nasuverse

If it was up to me personally I'd argue Hilbert space but that's just me plus I don't think the standards for the wiki favor Hilbert space for some reason

Yeah, that didn't really answer my question. It saying that concepts can be on "a higher level" doesn't imply qualitative superiority, even dimensions are part of a singular concept

Not necessarily if it was part of a singular concept it would be something akin to a universal from platonic realism if it is it would fs be 1-A

There can be the idea of the 5th dimension then the idea of the 6th dimension separately

If it was a singular concept it would be something akin to the universal from which properties of dimensions are exemplified from hence anything that falls under dimension-ness would be a part of that and would be independent of the limits of dimensions in the verse or not it would be higher than just 1-C

Besides if the concept already has r>f it being layered would entail qualitative superiority strictly only to dimensions because the nature of them carries r>f within the context of the verse

 

[Theoretical]

No? None of the scans you posted imply anything remotely close to an "infinite hierarchy". Whereas, Umineko's R>F stuff is pretty blatant

True the comparison of that to umineko isn't great because umineko makes it as clear as it can possibly be when it comes to positing the existence of an infinitely layered hierarchy

But r>f already exists inverse so

 

[Qawsedf234]

Alright, I went through the thread. Of the three mods that commented two rejected it, one didn't give their opinion and the thread idea has been rejected before.

I'm closing this thread.