Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why is everyone now misinterpreting the transcendence of "inaccessibility"? Just as there is an inaccessible transcendence between 1-A and H1-A, there is also an inaccessible transcendence between Aleph 1 and Aleph 2. For me, it's still not enough.alephs dont have to be directly stated, as long as theres a certain level of inaccessible superiority/transcendence, it applies the same.
I already told you there's no inaccessible transcendence between Aleph 1 and 2 it doesn't exist nowhere in set theory does it endorse the idea of Aleph 1 and 2 having an inaccessible transcendence it's just a higher infinity because powersetting can be used to reach the next nonetheless by definition making not an inaccessible gapthere is also an inaccessible transcendence between Aleph 1 and Aleph 2. For me, it's still not enough.
I thought you were trying something to make the root tier 0I have no idea what this thread is even about anymore, but nothing in that scan even remotely indicates High 1-A and no amount of extrapolation done can let the Root reach High 1-A from that.
Are we really still trying to make stuff high tiers off of random statements of non-euclidian geometry? Like, come on.
?I thought you were trying something to make the root tier 0
guess tier 0 root will never happen
I hope it happens one day?
Am I supposed to agree with every possible argument that may agree with my views now? And besides, I didn't even say anything about tier 0 in specific, I said it may eventually happen lol. It's, like, an absolute high end anyway, idk how confortable I even am with it.
Well this statementWhat do you think about this?
Does not at all support this claim"The concept of infinity is twinned with the concept of finite existence. It is this finite existence, this is end of all things that Shiki Ryougi observes with her arcane eyes, and the same end that she cuts to make entropy act quickly almost immediately. The prison she was contained in was made to be infinite, an inconceivable non-Euclidean space" - The Garden of Sinners [Empty Boundaries] Volume II (page 214]
Euclidean space is about plotting things out on a dimensional grid. Being non-Euclidean does not meaning being infinite or extra-dimensional, it just means you cannot plot them on a grid, which means nothing other than having your existence being strange.Actual infinity is completed as a collection; the idea is further extrapolated by using the analogy of a non-Euclidean space which is still an infinite space but with limits because for any dimension X, it would be infinite, but the limit comes from the next dimension, which is a directly higher infinity.
So for 2 dimensions, it would be infinity^infinity in hyperbolic Geometry/non-Euclidean geometry and the idea is carried on to any dimension up to 1-A+ the arithmetic and principle stays the same all the way up to 1-A+, the limit of the infinity relative to the first dimension would be infinity|^infinity, it can't reach the second dimension which is a higher infinity
As you know, power setting one infinity to reach another is an arithmetic operation that carries on all the way up to 1-A+ as well, and power setting a set of natural numbers is 2^n or infinity^infinity, which is still similar arithmetic to the hyperbolic Geometry stacking of any dimension X takes 2 dimensions for now being infinity^infinity
I'm not talking ab it in that sense im talking ab the gap in magnitude between Euclidean vector spacesEuclidean space is about plotting things out on a dimensional grid.
If you actually read the OP the non Euclidean space in this case is already infiniteBeing non-Euclidean does not meaning being infinite or extra-dimensional
That's not what the OP suggests but then again if staff still interprets like that I won't argue any furtherR>F over Euclidean space also would not warrant a 1-A+ or a High 1-A rating.
Euclidean space is just mapping things on a grid. A higher magnitude is just plotting more points onto an object, but that can't even get you to High 1-B, let alone High 1-A.I'm not talking ab it in that sense im talking ab the gap in magnitude between Euclidean vector spaces
Considering I quote the OP, yes I did read it.If you actually read the OP the non Euclidean space in this case is already infinite
Hi but this translation is incorrect. The Japanese copy that I own doesn't even state anything about Euclidean space.Non-Euclidean space just means a space where you can't plot vectors. It being infinite or finite doesn't mean anything for a AP rating, since you can be non-Euclidean without being higher dimensional.
Shiki woke up in another world, enclosed between the walls of the apartment. She cut through the impossible space of the impossible walls with a single swing.閉ざされた空間、マンションの壁と壁の間にもうけた異界の中で目を覚ました彼女は、その腕でありえない空間の、ありえない壁を斬ったのだ。
無限は、「 」ではない。無限を無限たらしめるには有限を定めなくてはいけないのだ。有限がなければ無限など存在しない。物事には果てがあるから、無限という事柄が観測される。両儀式は放りこまれた無限の中で、ありえない有限を視つけだして断ち切った。
だが無論、無限の中には有限などない。存在しないものは斬れないが故に、あの檻は脱出が不可能なのである。
しかし──有限がなければ、無限はないのだ。有限の壁が無かったにせよ有ったにせよ、両儀式の前にはそんな果てのない世界など意味をなさない。
有限が本当になければ、それは無限などではなく「 」であり。有限を内包しているのなら、式はそれを視つけだして断ち切ってしまう。
……絶対の筈の黒い穴は、この相手にだけはただの狭い暗室にすぎなかったのだと、魔術師は自身を恥じた。
What is it talking about when it refers to "impossible walls"?Shiki woke up in an another wall that is enclosed between the walls of the apartment. With her arms she cut through the impossible space of the impossible walls.
Infinite is not Emptiness. In order for something to be infinite it must defined as finite. If the concept of finite is not present then, then infinite would like be absent. Because everything in the world are finite, therefore the concept of infinity can be observed. Within the infinity of abyss where Ryougi Shiki was thrown into, she found and severed the otherwise impossible finite itself.
Sorry blud. Your translation is total dogshit Jesus christ. What do you mean by Infinite is not Emptiness?Hi but this translation is incorrect. The Japanese copy that I own doesn't even state anything about Euclidean space.
Shiki woke up in an another world, enclosed between the walls of the apartment. With her arms she cut through the impossible space of the impossible walls.
Infinite is not Emptiness. In order for something to be infinite it must defined as finite. If the concept of finite is not present then, then infinite would like be absent. Because everything in the world are finite, therefore the concept of infinity can be observed. Within the infinity of abyss where Ryougi Shiki was thrown into, she found and severed the otherwise impossible finite itself.
However, the concept of finite should not exist within infinity. Therefore it should be impossible to cut something that doesn't exist right? Thus, escaping from that abyss should of been impossible.
But, if there is no such thing as the concept of finite then it would not infinity, but rather "Emptiness" itself.
Ashamed of himself (Araya Souren), the infinity of abyss which should of been absolute was nothing more than a narrow dark room to his opponent (Shiki).
Dude, don't try to criticize the Japanese of someone fluent in the language. You'll just make yourself look badSorry blud. Your translation is total dogshit Jesus christ. What do you mean by Infinite is not Emptiness?
Firstly, I didn't know he was Japanese. Secondly, you really expect me to suddenly trust someone who has been trying to downgrade the verse several times unsuccessfully, all because he's Japanese? Wth?Dude, don't try to criticize the Japanese of someone fluent in the language. You'll just make yourself look bad
I'm not saying you have to trust everything he says, but he's pretty reliable when it comes to translation and he admits if and when he makes a mistake in translating something. This could be one of those cases though after taking a look at some of the stuff in the Japanese text he sent, I don't particularly see anything relating to Non-Euclidean spaces, unless that whole thing regarding impossible walls is supposed to mean that or somethingFirstly, I didn't know he was Japanese. Secondly, you really expect me to suddenly trust someone who has been trying to downgrade the verse several times unsuccessfully, all because he's Japanese? Wth?
Didn't know you had English comprehension issues, 有限が本当になければ、それは無限などではなく「 」であり。I said If the concept of finite doesn't exist, then IT isn't infinity, it is emptiness.Sorry blud. Your translation is total dogshit Jesus christ. What do you mean by Infinite is not Emptiness?
I'm not saying you have to trust everything he says, but he's pretty reliable when it comes to translation and he admits if and when he makes a mistake in translating something. This could be one of those cases though after taking a look at some of the stuff in the Japanese text he sent, I don't particularly see anything relating to Non-Euclidean spaces, unless that whole thing regarding impossible walls is supposed to mean that or something
Cool it. This was completely unnecessary.Your translation is total dogshit Jesus christ
Your interpretation still makes no sense. What is infinite of abyss? What are impossible walls?What are impossible space? What do you mean by "If the concept of finite is not present then, then infinite would like be absent."Didn't know you had English comprehension issues, 有限が本当になければ、それは無限などではなく「 」であり。I said If the concept of finite doesn't exist, then IT isn't infinity, it is emptiness.
無限は、「 」ではない。This is the statement where it says Infinity isn't Emptiness.
I reverse searched that Eucliean statement from this website and the Japanese text that's corresponding to the English translation doesn't match up whatsoever, it's EITHER grossly mistranslated or they inserted the wrong Japanese text
ah he is japanese i'm happyDude, don't try to criticize the Japanese of someone fluent in the language. You'll just make yourself look bad
okay now that's just being a jerk TdjwoSorry blud. Your translation is total dogshit Jesus christ. What do you mean by Infinite is not Emptiness?
apology acceptedI said I'm sorry
The infinite abyss is referring to Root, as it uses the same symbol.Your interpretation still makes no sense. What is infinite of abyss? What are impossible walls?What are impossible space? What do you mean by "If the concept of finite is not present then, then infinite would like be absent."
ah he is japanese i'm happy
because i'm chinese and i believe japanese and chinese people should be friends.
Sorry for being off-topic, i just want to make some japanese friends here. (i actually though believe i should like people regardless of their race)
i apologize if i'm being offensive for simply wanting to be friends with someone because of their raceAny
Bruh my gf is half Chinese-half Japanese. Don't count me out
mind telling me more on this despite the fact that i won't be able to understand it at all?The infinite abyss is referring to Root, as it uses the same symbol.
i will thanks for reminding me@Artorimachi_Meteoraft take the conversation about friendship to his wall.
It's saying that infinity and the root aren't the same thing. He translated it as emptiness because the symbol doesn't particularly mean much iirc. It's just quotes. This just goes back to the Root's apophatic naturemind telling me more on this despite the fact that i won't be able to understand it at all?
So there's even less to this CRT than there was before.Hi but this translation is incorrect. The Japanese copy that I own doesn't even state anything about Euclidean space.
Damn, it really do be like that, huh?Hi but this translation is incorrect. The Japanese copy that I own doesn't even state anything about Euclidean space.
It makes perfect sense dude. The BestMGQScaler has already interpreted the text with no issues.If the concept of finite is not present then, then infinite would like be absent."
「」lacking/being above "infinite" and "finite" also contextually makes sense when you consider apophasis which is a main point of 「」.
it makes sense
it's superior to notions of infinity and finite
infinity can only exists when there's finite
thats what the translation says too
it contextually makes sense
I linked a wiki website that I reverse searched about the Euclidean space statement and the Japanese text that corresponded to the Euclidean space was the raw text I provided. Unless they inserted the incorrect Japanese text in that particular line, it doesn't even say Euclidean space, it says what I provided. And it sounds incredibly flowery.So there's even less to this CRT than there was before.