I've got to respond again because some of these points are really bad to just leave people to assume they're correct blindly
Yes, exactly. This was Paul's rebuttal to it:
However, that does not seem logical to me. If the initial amount is infinite, it seems impossible that the addition of more would somehow exhaust the universe. I would be more inclined to think that the ideal reconciliation of that information is that it's not truly infinite, but can be described as infinite because of this information:
This reconciliation doesn't make sense because it ignores what is actually said. It explicitly says the issue is the propagation (addition) specifically, whether or not you think that doesn't make sense is ultimately irrelavant because it's outright what's said. And that much can not be ignored. Like "it seems impossible the issue is X" when the text says the issue is X, is a textbook argument from incredulity and holds no weight at all.
Moving on, your earlier argument is that "the qtl thing is more believable because it isn't a one off mention of infinity", but it's the opposite. It's the one off thing that says there isn't infinite, as in, it's one vs several over the course of years, this is sort of just objectively what an outlier is, and this would be an outlier to assume it in the way you are currently, one statement vs a consistently repeated sentiment over the course of 15 years, including after this statement, it's very clear which is more important.
I was under the impression that the beginning of time started with 1 timeline that branched off. It has the potential to reach infinity, but the culling prevents this.
Culled off Timelines eventually cease to exist, leaving the current number of active timelines as finite.
This is incorrect as well, it never started with one timeline, because there are multiple types of worlds to begin with. It's impossible to all be branching off a single timeline, for instance, Tsukihime and Fate worlds are diametrically opposed in their very foundation, they aren't split off eachother, same thing with KnK, or FSF, etc. Its impossible for there to be one that's branched off and results in where we are now because of that, these worlds are considered very distinct and completely incompatible, there isn't some "prime timeline" rather that's explicitly impossible due to multiple different foundations existing.
As I said, based on the multiple repeats of saying there are infinite, there were already an infinite amount which is what is split off of, the fact that there exists worlds incompatible with eachother is pretty clear evidence that it's not "starting at one and expanding but unable to reach infinity"
Also just, your actual first part is incorrect. Its impossible for it to "be able to reach infinity" but be prevented from doing so by culling deleting a finite amount, thats not how infinite works, and thus cant be what the multiple infinite statements mean
Yeah, I think this is a good example of how the verse tends to play fast and loose with the word "infinite" and use it in a practical rather than literal sense.
"Matou Sakura's stock of magical energy reaches a trillion. As it cannot be used within a lifetime, it can be called an infinite supply."
Then it talks about Rin being able to match her by repeatedly drawing mana into the sword from the same individual cavern, over and over again, from "one of the infinite parallel worlds."
But as we can see above, Sakura's infinite magical supply isn't actually infinite, so why not the same for these parallel worlds? The text then says "If your supply is inexhaustible, mine is limitless!" But this doesn't necessarily mean that the timelines are infinite, because the various possibilities will continue to branch off and never stop, so even if they are eventually culled by the Quantum Time Lock, Rin will always have new possibilities to draw mana from.
This does the exact opposite of show the verse plays fast and loose with the word infinite, what? It shows that they treat infinite as something very distinct from things that are functionally infinite or inexhaustible, in other words, it shows that useage of infinite means infinite. In fact, this scene also completely makes your own point impossible.
It differentiates inexhaustible from actually infinite, citing that Rin has infinite because of there being infinite parallel worlds whereas Sakura merely had an inexhaustible supply via her connection to the grail, which she cant use all of. Your counter to this is "well, maybe it just means new worlds are made when others are deleted" but this instantly contradicts the entire point of the scene. That would make Rin's energy source the same as Sakura's, not actually infinite, but just inexhaustible since new sources keep appearing. It'd be the same as her no longer infinite, but just a finite amount that didn't run out, this of course, is the opposite of what the scene says, and goes out of its way to differentiate between.
Which means this interpretation just can not possibly be true at all, it completely ignores the actual scene to establish a really weird contradictory headcanon explanation.
To answer Regidian's question, if I'm understanding it right, an infinite-sized 3-D universe amounts to High 3-A levels of energy; however, the energy needed to sustain timelines would need to be 4-D or Tier 2 level.
Based on the Quantum Time Lock Mechanic, there is limited 4-D energy to go around and sustain finite active timelines.
No, again, the statement says there isn't energy for the propagation, I'm not sure how clear this can get, it's not sustaining them that's the issue mentioned in the mats or Altera route.
However, as the unrestricted propagation of this process would exhaust the lifespan...
But why do such realities become solitary? Shouldn't it be that whatever the future, the possibility of adjacent advancement persists?
Unfortunately, this isn't the case. The energy to account for the proliferation of unnecessary worlds...
it really doesn't get any more clear, you can say it doesn't make sense, but it's quite literally just how the verse works and arguing otherwise is ignoring the literal text. And again, your interpretation clashes with CCC saying there's infinite, FSN saying there's infinite, FGO saying there's infinite in the main story, FGO saying there's infinite in events etc, so even when ignoring the fact it's specifically the proliferation that's the issue, it's just the outlier as a statement
I mixed up his authorization with BestMGQ's, but that said, looking at Firestorm's wall he asked for authorization and was told no, so I find it somewhat problematic that he sought out you after getting a no from him.
He asked Crimson first actually, and just didn't get a response until later
Regardless, he was asked to dial it back and was not doing that.
He has no reason to, as he sort of has to post scans and explain things so staff can read it, and not sit to themselves in their own interpretation devoid of evidence and agree with eachother and refuse to change view points. Threadbanning him doesn't help anything, it just hinders delivering evidence or points or the small amount of discussion actually occurring here.
And I have no idea why you think I haven't touched anything fate related, but that simply isn't the case at all.
Considering you're literally quoting tm wiki, hyperlinks and all, I'm going to have to say that's probably why that's assumed
Also, I'm not pretending only me and Firestorm's opinions matter. But this is a staff discussion thread. It's meant to primarily be staff.
It may be meant to primarily be staff, but the thread itself is pointless if there isn't actually correct information being posted. If instead it's left purely to the only two active staff, who haven't read everything and already came to their conclusions, then when other staff come in there's not much for them to actually base decisions on. The actual supporters of the verse, who aren't staff btw, have to be able to post in order to dispell misinformation and incorrect things being said. It's not like that hurts staff discussion because there just isn't any staff discussion happening anyway
Further, something brought to my attention on discord, this entire weird timeline number tangent the thread was turned to is derailing as a whole, the thread itself is about the dimensions, and as I'm sure you know, the number of timelines just, isn't important for that.