Right, so, since Deagon requested my input here again, I'm gonna go out a limb here and do that. Helping out a homie and all that.
He's pointed me to this specific post:
I've been asked to provide input here.
To be honest, this thread is a headache to navigate. This isn't the fault of any single person, but I implore anyone intending to further discuss this topic to at least try to keep things more concise - reading a multiple page long thread on a complex topic is one thing, but when many individual posts are upwards of thousands of words long, it's past the point that this is completely unreasonable for anyone not already caught up on the thread to evaluate. That being said, here are my contentions.
My main concern is the question of how literally Rin's monologue is supposed to be interpreted. Rin's monologue acts as the supporting context for the statement about the Moon Cell having an "8th dimensional defense wall", but reading it over and over again, I don't place a high vote of confidence on the statements of higher dimensional existence in it being literal.
To quote a couple sections of the monologue to explain what I mean:
"The perception of the recorded universe is over many dimensions…think of it as a higher dimensional existence."
"From this higher dimension, the third dimension looks like a flat scroll."
"Er, if the three-dimensional world is a world drawn in a book, and then if you jumped inside the book and came out outside the book, something like that?"
For the sake of not contradicting myself regarding concision, I won't point out every example in the text, but my problem is essentially this: throughout the whole monologue, Rin speaks entirely of this "higher dimensional existence" in analogous terms. We're dodging around the fact that she never really refers in this monologue to a literal higher dimensional existence; rather, as seen above and elsewhere, she uses higher dimensional existence as an analogy to explain the function of the Moon Cell in clearer terms. What she says, for example, is that BB can see the past, present, and future in a way analogous to how a person could see all sections of a book at once. When taken with the context of the Moon Cell's capabilities to simulate possible futures and therefore analyse any point in these simulations, this makes sense, and doesn't necessarily imply anything we would consider HDE - it's just something that's easy to explain using dimensionality as a an analogy.
I'll note that this is potentially an artefact of the translation process - I cannot personally verify whether the phrasing used suggesting this is being talked of in analogous terms is a consequence of poor translation. But when dealing with higher dimensional tiering, I expect a high burden of proof. When the presence of 8 dimensions is supported by an uncontextualised one-off statement, and the closest thing we have to a reference to this dimensionality elsewhere is in the form of an analogy, I'm left looking at this and thinking that there are very different ways of interpreting this evidence. I can't say I'm convinced.
So, the bottom issue here seems to be that, even in the monologue giving exposition about higher dimensions, said higher dimensions are not used in a literal sense, but in terms of an analogy, and as such what it's describing isn't necessarily a 1:1 match with what is actually happening, but more an approximation of how it works.
Yeah, so, the thing is that this doesn't seem to be the case. Using the translation which the OP provided:
However, the laws of the Recorded Universe are different. The Recorded Universe is a higher dimensional perception... Think of it as a higher existence.
Umm, let's say that a three-dimensional world was depicted inside a book and if we were to jump, we would be able to exit from that book, right? it is as if I'm looking down at my past, present, and future like it were recorded in that book that I just jumped out of. Do you understand now? This is as known as higher-dimensional perspective. Meaning that every timeline in the book converges and becomes one.
All of this is fairly straightforward: "The Recorded Universe is a higher-dimensional perception," "This is known as a higher-dimensional perspective," and etc. Even in
the other translation that the above post quoted, it is still stated that "the perception of the recorded universe is over many dimensions." None of this seems to be actually meant as an analogy, and at the very best, the analogy here would be found in the comparison between a book and its reader, which in and of itself doesn't mean the higher-dimensional statements are purely analogies.
In fact, something both translations agree on is:
It's the same as that. This is imaginary number space, a higher-dimensional information space made of light
It is the same idea here. The imaginary number space is composed of a higher plane of information made from light.
And here is another thing that's been posted up there with regards to this:
Rani :: …Indeed. We can conjecture that it is in order to prevent them from deviating from their function as observational mechanisms, but…In truth, it may have been to prevent cases like the present one from occurring. The Moon Cell is the eyes of god. The photon-based recording medium in the Core is a higher dimensional existence.
So I really struggle to see how one can take this as being just comparisons. At no point do the scans ever feature the characters going "X is like Y." No, all of them repeatedly have them go "X
is Y," and then one of them gives an analogy Z to describe how Y functions. Yet because Z is an analogy, that must mean the equation to Y was an analogy as well? That's just not very sound logic at all.
To quote a part of the previous discussion that caught my eye, also:
We have two pieces of information. The first and simplest is the scan from BB where the wall guarding the Moon Cell Core is described as "cutting through eight dimensions." The second, and more complicated, is Rin's monologue. She is asked about the concept of the Observed Universe, and explains the difference between it and the Recorded Universe, how time passes linearly and irreversibly in the OU but in the RU, past present and future exist at the same time. This is referred to as a higher dimensional perspective. The ability to view time non-linearly, to flip back and forth.
She uses an analogy of a three-dimensional world as a book that you come outside of and then you can view past and present simultaneously, because the Moon Cell follows the laws of a Recorded Universe, it's a concurrent world simulator. This is crucial. Ask yourself why BB can view the past and present of the Moon Cell simultaneously. Is it because she is a four dimensional or eight dimensional being? No, it is because she became the computer that is processing the timelines of the moon cell as data.
This line of logic has much of the same issues I've talked about in here before. Namely the fact that it basically goes "There are two pieces of information, X and Y, leading to a result Z. We know that X holds, and as such Y is really just a way of describing X, and not to be taken literally."
Translating that into more concrete terms, it basically goes: "We know that the Moon Cell stores the information of all its worlds as accessible data, allowing it to look at their past, present and future as one simultaneous structure. We also know that the Moon Cell's existence and perspective is described as a higher-dimensional one, which allows it to look down on the timeline and its past and future. However, given what we already know about it, surely those statements are simply referring to the data factor, and not to actual higher dimensionality."
As I said.prior, this is a bit of a weird point because it starts off with the notion that the "Moon Cell has access to the data of its worlds and as such to their pasts and futures" overrides "The Moon Cell is a higher-dimensional existence, looking down at past, present and future as part of one continuous object, instead of as a process" due to some posited fundamental incompatibility between the two.
The idea that there is such an incompatibility, to begin with, seems to be based on the argument that, since spatiality is a physical attribute, and the Moon Cell is non-physical, then the Moon Cell's worlds can't have true dimensionality, but given the very matter-of-fact tone in which the higher dimensions in question are ascribed to the Moon Cell, I'd say that this should be just be taken as evidence that the Moon Cell's worlds do, in fact, have some manner of spatiality to them after all.
Trying to recontextualize those statements to say they actually meant something other than what the the text hints at is pretty disingenuous in the face of that. We don't even treat a lack of materiality as being necessarily something that prevents higher-dimensional spaces from getting high tiers, at least not if superiority over physical worlds is demonstrated by them.
We know souls are not higher infinities not because of other people's abilities to interact with them, rather, the concrete level of power that souls have in the verse. One of the early events in Unlimited Blade Works is Rin discovered the magic circles Shinji and his servant placed to harvest the souls of the students in the high school for magic energy. These servants are tiered around 6-B.
If what you claim about "higher dimensions" is true, each individual human soul can be said to have a higher infinity over a 3-D universe, rendering them 3-A at the absolute lowest. This is directly disproven by the fact that 6-B servants often harvest hundreds of souls at once. By the fact that souls can be captured and imprisoned by beings far far weaker than that. There is nothing in the entire franchise to suggest souls wield such incredible power. Everything we know about them proves the exact opposite of that. So by what measure are they "higher dimensional?" They certainly don't have an additional spatial dimension, they lack any spatial dimensions.
Oh right, they're a spiritual phenomenon that is independent of the time axis. This is one of two, possibly three instances in the verse where "higher dimensional" can be concrete disproven to refer to spatiality nor a higher infinity.
No, that's not my argument. I'm not denying that they are higher dimensional, I am contesting your interpretation of what that means. Namely that it refers to an additional geometric dimension and that it confers a higher infinity. In the case of souls, I have proven this to be false. For heroic spirits likewise, this can also be proven false. Heroic spirits and the Throne do not have spatial dimensions, they are a spiritual existence independent of the axis of time, so we know definitively that this is not referring to geometric dimensions. Moreover, we know that they are not a higher infinity either. Even though they are much more powerful than their servant versions and earth magicians, their level of power is simply not that high.
Same as above. The whole "I claim X and Y are fundamentally incompatible pieces of information, so I'm going to say Y doesn't actually mean what it means and was really just a way of talking about X" is something that doesn't convince me in the slightest. That said: If absorption of higher-dimensional constructs (That you claim would hold the same relationship over the timeline that BB does) seemingly only confers a finite power boost in-verse, that's a good deal more concrete as counterevidence. I'll wait for any responses from supporters on that matter before I proceed, especially given Paul claiming they have infinite power and whatnot.
The Heroic Spirits thing I'm not as interested in, since I recall talk from the supporters of the verse saying that they do, in fact, scale to Tier 1 even if their regular Servant counterparts don't, but I welcome elaboration on that too, I suppose. You haven't posted any material that would serve as counterweight to the claim that they do scale to Tier 1 (And largely only based that point of yours on something I've already said doesn't convince me at all, from what I can tell), so, if there is such material to post, now is the time.
Can anyone please identify what space in the MoonCell is supposed to be 4-D?
How does this matter for the current discussion?