The thing is that we're not trying to tier that specific statement in its context but rather to apply the idea of being apophatic to the very idea/concept/definition of a hypercube which would be encompassed by the Taiji for instance. It's more of a supportive argument for the Root than anything else.
That's textbook NLF...
Ah hell nah, not this again...
I mean it's true. You're basically taking the hypercube dimensions to the highest interpretation (it being able to represent absolutely any amount of dimensions). When +1 dimensions or even just 4D can easily satisfy that.
Did you read my comment ? I'm talking about the whole idea/concept of it in the verse, not in the specific context of Koyanska defining the mental structure. Are you suggesting that the very concept of a hypercube (which is encompassed by the Taiji) is limited to 4D ?
Kinda throwing some weird buzzwords at me that ultimately mean nothing.
Huh ?
. Well, nevermind everything if it’s just to say « NLF » and misrepresenting my point anyways.
Dunno about you, but that's uncalled for
Sips quietly on a cup of tea
Comprehension issues
I mean... Why is throwing nonsense like "very concept of hypercube encompassed by taiji" anything meaningful? How does this mean anything? The idea of higher dimensions already exist in the verse. It's just world salad. It wouldn't contain all possible dimensionalities that a hypercube could have and could be easily satisfied with just 4D. A lot of this just doesn't fly on this wiki.Comprehension issues
He talk About how the root would be above the idea of hypercube of any-N existing. And he would be true since even if their was suddenly a description about it, root would be above it bcz it's nature.
Where is the n-dimensional statement? It'd have to be way more direct. Right now it's just assertions.
The hypercube definition is that it's a cube with n-dimension. You like ask me to show that fire burn in fate
That still doesn't amount to anything higher than whatever higher dimensions exist within the verse. This is still quite literally a NLF. You're trying to take something vague and not really shown to be "any amount of dimensions" to the highest possible point which is "any amount of dimensions.".
No? The definition litteral of the hypercube is a cube of n-dimmension. Their litteraly no number of dimmension attached to it. Their no NLF in litteraly tell you what the definition is. You litteraly tell a definition is limited to the number of existing higher D in the verse
Taking literal definitions won't help your case and doesn't help with a lot of verses as that can lead to a lot of wank and overinflated ratings. It's an appeal to definition. You are trying to equate things in real life to things in fiction. A hypercube is just 4D or higher dimensions. In case of nasuverse it can still just be defined by the higher dimensions that exist in the verse.
Yall should leave BestMGQ alone. He hasn't played FGO
Ahem that's not how N-dimensional statements work
Then that means the verse gets removed from the wiki GGNasuverse definitely has opps
Should we just bother nasu and force him to say "Nasuverse is outerversal in vs battle wiki" so that people can stop saying it's a wank everytime there's some argument for it being 1-A
Because the Hypercube’s concept is literally being n-dimensional, not 4D or any set dimensionality.
… ? Anyways, Ockham’s razor would prefer my interpretation over yours since a hypercube quite literally means what it means. Downplaying it and saying « appeal to definition » won’t change what a hypercube is, it’s like dismissing a statement because « there is no proof that the words used in it follow the real definitions we know », which is nonsensical.
Yup.
Certified scaling moment
.
a 3D, 2D, 1D, and even 0D hypercube is impossible and does not exist.
Say what ?
That’s not a very good point to make anyways and does not change anything.
4 – If one moves the cube one unit length into the fourth dimension, it generates a 4-dimensional unit hypercube (a unit tesseract).
Imma be real with you chief, you cannot really argue against this, not to mention that :
It’s like… not changing anything ? What point are you even trying to make when talking about less than 4 dimensions ?
No idea since it is indeed irrelevant to tiering and will still remain a NLF to assume absolutely any amount of dimensions.
Koyanska’s dialogue line when talking to Kiara (dialogue 6). The quote uses these kanjis « 超次元立方体 » which mean « superdimensional hypercube » / « hyperdimensional cube ».
I will be repeating myself once again and for the last time. I’m not talking about an actually or hypothetically existing hypercube, but the actual concept of a hypercube, which entails the notion of any n-dimensional hypercube existing going by its definition. In which case the Root is beyond that very concept ; in other words, any n-dimensional space cannot be the Root hence its 1-A tier.
Alright. Any idea on the dreamlands one?
More or less, didn’t really try to search for it but I remember finding a spacebattle thread that talked about it. Would be best if the guy responded to Mr Underlord though.
Skull emoji_61
