Tdjwo
He/Him- 3,175
- 1,298
That's objectively wrong.Countless is any finite number, and there is no end to how many finite numbers there are. You can always add an extra 1, or 2. But they are still finite.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's objectively wrong.Countless is any finite number, and there is no end to how many finite numbers there are. You can always add an extra 1, or 2. But they are still finite.
How so?That's objectively wrong.
If you become "omnipotent" in one dimension, you can't stack it up to higher dimensions. Because she talks about the fact that there is no end to being "omnipotent" on the plane, rather than "there is no end to being omnipotent in all dimensions".It says she's omnipotent in one dimension implying that higher "omnipotence" also applies in the higher dimensions still making it endless path of omnipotence.
Because you can't count something that's literally countless lol. Basic arithmetical comprehension. For something to be countless, it has to be infinite.How so?
We have never treated countless and infinite as the same thing.Because you can't count something that's literally countless lol. Basic arithmetical comprehension. For something to be countless, it has to be infinite.
Countless simply talks about something too many to count. Not infinityBecause you can't count something that's literally countless lol. Basic arithmetical comprehension. For something to be countless, it has to be infinite.
Yes we have;We have never treated countless and infinite as the same thing.
Graham’s Number: And I took that personally.Because you can't count something that's literally countless lol. Basic arithmetical comprehension. For something to be countless, it has to be infinite.
As I said, it's only +1 dimension according to DT and Agnaa but I'm still waiting for them to decide.Not insulting anyone but this thread is an unorganized shitshow rn xD
Countable infinity does not refer to countless, it refers toYes we have;
High Hyperverse level
Characters or objects that can universally affect, create and/or destroy structures whose size is equivalent to a countably infinite number of qualitative sizes above a universal model, usually represented in fiction by endless hierarchies of layers of existence, each succeeding one completely trivializing the previous into insignificance, or more generally a space with countably infinite dimension
It does apply to the universe since Roa was referring to the universe hence Kiara being bound to them even if she's higher d. But that's irrelevant to the crt atm.This does not apply to the universe as a note. All this does is prove that a hypothetically infinite dimensional structure/cosmology could exist. No currently low 1-C/1-C character will scale to this.
Now I sleep.
Not what countless means, but sure. Idk why it would be restricted to the universe. Seems more likely that it extends way past thatBecause I assumed you read the scan and understood it which most of you don't seem to have done. So do you still think it's infinite levels into 1B(ehhwwwk) or High 1B?
Wasn’t Kiara above the universe?It does apply to the universe since Roa was referring to the universe hence Kiara being bound to them even if she's higher d. But that's irrelevant to the crt atm.
No what?Wasn’t Kiara above the universe?
Cause Agnaa, DT, and Ultima decided to change stuff making it even harder to deal with statements like this. In the end Tdjwo is right, we should wait for one of them.Why is there an argument about countless when it says no end/endless
As for Ultima, I already posted what he said;Cause Agnaa, DT, and Ultima decided to change stuff making it even harder to deal with statements like this. In the end Tdjwo is right, we should wait for one of them.
All he needed was to prove Kiara's higher d senses or higher d existence which was later concluded that she had both.The excerpt itself seems fine insofar as proving High 1-B goes, seeing as the examples of "transcendence" that are given in-context are flat-out about people ascending to higher dimensions, it seems (Although I'd like more context on Kiara, since all the statement says is that she got higher-dimensional senses)
Root is already 1A and I don't see why it wouldn't apply tbhagree with High 1-B hierachy but not sure if it applies to the universe.
Root definitely scales tho
Because a negative theology downgrade is coming which would most likely bump down root to 1-C/High 1-C.Root is already 1A and I don't see why it wouldn't apply tbh
I can swear that's not the only thing DT and Agnaa will object to. But yeah, we need wait for all 3.Cause Agnaa, DT, and Ultima decided to change stuff making it even harder to deal with statements like this. In the end Tdjwo is right, we should wait for one of them.
"the no matter how much" part supports infinite lil bro
Uhhh...tl;dr of the new standards seems to be that almost nothing makes the jump to 1-A without already establishing a High 1-B construct. The few things that could are very explicit that they generalise, like "no matter how many dimensions". Just being "beyond any dimensions", "source of dimensions", "concept of dimensions", etc. doesn't do more than a +1 over the existing cosmology.
The term universe is contextual based it could refer to the texture of humanity which was said to have only 3 vectors of space and 1 as a separate one hence 4D.Wasn’t Kiara above the universe?
This is pretty reasonable, but the hierarchy of higher dimensional beings can't apply to things outside of the universe, the outer universe was described as being beyond reasoning and how the laws of the universe are completely not applicable to it so presumably even the notion of higher dimensions.Although I have some qualms about it applying to the universe the high 1-B hierarchy is still there. I believe you should've discussed this if other nasuverse supporters even wanted you guys to post this CRT yet.
Really? Can't say I'd be a fan of that personally but hopefully whatever the conclusion of this thread is help supports its tierBecause a negative theology downgrade is coming which would most likely bump down root to 1-C/High 1-C.
That has nothing to do with what's proposed tho? Wasn't that thread for characters beyond dimensional existence? This thread is proposing the existence of those dimensions.Uhhh...
TrueIn the end Tdjwo is right, we should wait for one of them.
That isn't really relevant, is it?If this thread is accepted, will any characters scale into the H 1-B hierarchy?
Countless or some stuff like that isn't always regarded as infinite, so I guess 1-B.Personally it seems more like 1B with anyone above it being High 1B or higher
It's "endless" not countless actually. So it should still be high 1B based on the requirements for high 1B pertaining to endless transcendence of hierachies.Countless or some stuff like that isn't always regarded as infinite, so I guess 1-B.
Man it's just a question and my goal is only a simple answerThat isn't really relevant, is it?
The question itself is a derailment and doesn't serve any purpose or progression to the thread. Why do you need to know, if I may ask?Man it's just a question and my goal is only a simple answer
its derailing frMan it's just a question and my goal is only a simple answer