No offense, but what a you on about?. She just compare the relationship between higher and lower dimension, literally the sentence is about that
So if there is nothing prove +1D, why it must be the other way around which is 1-A level of difference?. It could be neither +1D and 1-A thus mean nothing at all, no upgrade lol. The absence of evidences is not always supporting for other argument, it could well mean that feats, statements in question floating in a vacuum and can't be determined
Although I ask you to
read my previous explanation about R>F as a complement, which is very important, I will summarize:
On the other hand, the laws of the registered universe are different. The registered universe is a perception of a higher dimension, think of it as an existence (存在) of a Higher Dimension (高次元).
Image unknown hosted in ImgBB
ibb.co
If we look from a higher dimension (高次元), the third dimension is nothing more than a flat scroll (平面の巻物)
(平面: Refers to something that has a surface like a sheet of paper or a screen; in this context, it refers to a sheet since it is within the illustrated book.)
Image unknown hosted in ImgBB
ibb.co
I will be able to see from a comprehensive perspective my past (過去), present (現在), and future (未来), which were in the book (本) until now, as if they were records (記録) at any moment.
(She insists on using 中にいた (naka ni ita), meaning "was inside," referring to the fact that she was inside the book. The surface of the "scroll" is an event from a lower dimension, but the perspective is that of a book.)
Image unknown hosted in ImgBB
ibb.co
This is the perspective (視点) from a higher dimension (高次元). You understand, right? In this case, the time (時間) inside the book (本) would become of equal value to everything.
Image unknown hosted in ImgBB
ibb.co
Now, the textures, as I already shared about Oberon's quote:
However, what most supports this is that he explicitly mentions what an illustrated book is: "Here, everything was a fairy tale. It was a single story." A 14,000-year-old illustrated book created by Morgan, which only had a place in the fictional history. He highlights the illustrated book as a fictional story, just like in his explanation of tales.
Image Captura-de-Tela-5360 hosted in ImgBB
ibb.co
He later mentions that he is a
Also conceptual difference in what?. Conceptual difference could get you to at least 1-A if you have enough evidences they arr conceptually difference at the level of platonic concept, or undeterminable conceptually difference mean nothing
The gods themselves are already conceptual, there are infinite gods. If you want proof of this I can bring it too.
character made by legends, a fictional character, and explains that "as a secondary character. If I think too much, reality will become unstable." They have the idea of being stories and legends, but they cannot be mentally unstable in this situation. He continues: "It’s not expected that the reader has so much imagination. Not even the playwright who wrote the script." Here, he clearly refers to the story as a tale, concluding with: "It’s just a fairy tale. Unnecessary things can be forgotten on a page." He even refers to pages as "events" in the story, exactly what Rin explained in CCC, as records of the past, present, and future within the tale.
Image Captura-de-Tela-5061 hosted in ImgBB
ibb.co
Image Captura-de-Tela-4976 hosted in ImgBB
ibb.co
Image Captura-de-Tela-4975 hosted in ImgBB
ibb.co
Oberon says that the illustrated books are materializations of dreams. They are fictional stories made by someone, which was exactly the case of Morgan. She created the materialization of a dream she wished for. He mentions that the Queen’s Calendar is a fairy tale written by Morgan.
Image Captura-de-Tela-5070 hosted in ImgBB
ibb.co
(And about dreams, I ask you to read my previous explanation to understand better.)
This True Ether is the primordial source that establishes the gods.
It was not humans who ruled this era. It was the gods. It could even be said that they were nature or concepts.
There are gods in the sky, gods on the earth, gods in the sea. Love is a god, hatred is a god, war and death are also gods.
The world belongs to the gods, and it can be said that it is, itself, the gods.