-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Naruto Uzumaki vs Ryomen Sukuna
- Thread starter Chosensan
- Start date
- Status
- 8,851
- 5,686
Huh. I think I favor naruto's side now since sukuna can't kill kim anymore, wait sukuna can't kill naruto anymore.
- 10,083
- 8,214
AP is useless when Sukuna really wants to kill. Sukuna's attacks adapt to the opponent's power and durability
- 8,851
- 5,686
Is it durability negation? Because he like city level AP and has no durability negation on his profile so naruto appears to AP nuke.
- 8,851
- 5,686
Wtf does that mean? It isn't durability negation then so what is it? Can it cut someone way way above the users AP?
- 10,083
- 8,214
It adapts to the opponent's power to kill with one attack. That's it. Power and dura is irrelevant
- 8,851
- 5,686
Ok that's what durability negation is so naruto is dead cool ok.
- 3,249
- 807
Honestly I don’t know how Naruto deals with cleave
He probably just gets chopped up
He probably just gets chopped up
- 4,451
- 1,947
...that's not dura neg that's like, Damage Boost and Adaptation. If it's listed as dura neg that needs to change.
- 3,249
- 807
It’s listed as a varying in power technique on his page and not Dura neg
- 8,851
- 5,686
But that's kinda dumb like are you telling me that technique is instantly gonna adapt to universal durability then one shot that doesn't make sense there has to be some catch.
- 4,451
- 1,947
durability neg literally has the same effect lmao...
- 8,851
- 5,686
Then this technique IS a durability negation technique even if only limited.
- 3,249
- 807
Dura neg does the same
There is no catch
It just adapts to the strength of the opponent so that it can one shot them Ik it sounds easy to NLF but same could be same for Dura neg
- 3,249
- 807
No, it just functions like Dura neg
They’re doing the same thing but not the same way
- 4,451
- 1,947
No it literally isn't lmao, not by definition at all. I was saying dura neg would also allow a wall level fighter to kill a universal fighter.
- 8,851
- 5,686
I disagree with you guys. Durability negation is harming an opponent regardless of their durability and there are many types, like attacking them when defense is useless like with fire against or targeting internal organs or stuff like that, this technique does this same thing and achieves the same result.
If this isn't durability negation then you'd be claiming that a small city level attack can one shot an opponent with universal durability.
- 4,451
- 1,947
It's literally not durability negation. Saying it is ignores how the ability is described to work, i'd prefer we take the actual description over your headcanon on how you believe it works.
Also, just claim NLF dude.
Also, just claim NLF dude.
- 8,851
- 5,686
So you're saying that cleave is an ability that hits regardless of the opponents durability isn't durability negation even though it's the same result? And what evidence is there to suggest that it can adapt to any durability since that will be NLF?
- 4,451
- 1,947
Same result =/= the same thing... I could shoot you with a gun and kill you, or run you over, and the end result is you die. Did I do the same thing because you died in both scenarios? No. Obviously not.
I honestly don't give a shit about this point. The description of the move is that it adapts to the opponents durability, if you wanna argue it can kill a universal character, fine. Go right on ahead. You not believing something doesn't change the actual objective fact about what the move itself is.
- 8,851
- 5,686
That's obviously not the same thing. In this case the technique ignores the opponents durability which is why I think it's durability negation.
I don't believe it can and I haven't watched to this part of the show so this is why I am asking you for evidence for if the technique can hit at such high durability or not.
- 4,451
- 1,947
"In this case the technique ignores the opponents durability"
It ADAPTS TO THEIR DURABILITY. Stop being a brick.
It ADAPTS TO THEIR DURABILITY. Stop being a brick.
- 8,851
- 5,686
What does that mean???? Does the attack itself magically get stronger to compensate for the durability?
- 4,451
- 1,947
That's the description of the attack, right?
- 1,867
- 433
The attack itself becomes stronger the higher the dura someone gets, it can be dura neg but it's not ignoring durability itself, it's just increasing the attack to match the durability.
- 4,451
- 1,947
"it can be dura neg" no that's just wrong lmao it doesn't ignore dura
- 1,867
- 433
Ig, but read the bold text
- 8,851
- 5,686
Ok I concede sorry. But it still feels very NLF so what's up with that?
- 4,451
- 1,947
I read the bold text. That's just not what durability negation is at all.
I don't know. Gojo's purple is also pretty NLF with how it works but I don't really care about it I know virtually nothing about the verse other than what it describes itself on the profiles.
- 6,105
- 2,510
[QUOTE="Axxtentacle, post: 3783045, member: 10709"
I don't know. Gojo's purple is also pretty NLF with how it works but I don't really care about it I know virtually nothing about the verse other than what it describes itself on the profiles.
[/QUOTE]
purpule is just combining positive and negative energy to erase matter (so basically just EE)
I don't know. Gojo's purple is also pretty NLF with how it works but I don't really care about it I know virtually nothing about the verse other than what it describes itself on the profiles.
[/QUOTE]
purpule is just combining positive and negative energy to erase matter (so basically just EE)
- 6,105
- 2,510
purple is just combining + and - energy to erase matter (is just EE)
- 4,451
- 1,947
Unless i'm misremembering something, the description of the move has "there are no exceptions" which is like, the definition of NLF.
- 6,105
- 2,510
blue and red is just repelling and attracting stuff
purple is just erasing stuff
"Hollow Technique: Purple: Satoru combines Red and Blue, filling a void with imaginary mass to expunge everything along its path from existence."
- 4,451
- 1,947
Yeah, I thought the end of that description said there wasn't any exception?
- Status
