That just isn’t our argument. We are arguing that because Boruto didn’t find them pertinent enough to mention as opposed to referencing the planet’s energy, that they likely are not a significant aspect to the jutsu. This is very much a logically reasoned conclusion. The reason Boruto is explaining the jutsu to his allies is such that they can gain an understanding of the jutsu, as the reason anyone explains anything is to grant the person receiving the explanation an understanding of whatever is being explained. So, when Boruto intentionally leaves out the other forces in his explanation towards allies that he has no reason to withhold pertinent information and lie to, we can logically reason that those unnamed forces aren’t relevant to the jutsu. Hence the essence of the abduction argument. By taking this known and unknown information we are able to piece together a conclusion irrespective of the whole picture, that is most likely to be true. It is not an argument from ignorance because it inherently addresses the information that we the audience are ignorant of and substantiates a likely interpretation of the information we do know, again this is an abduction argument.
We aren’t appealing to abduction without explaining how we abductively reasoned our conclusion. We’ve laid out several times the logic that leads to our conclusion, logic that you have yet to refute or even address. You are simply attempting to shift the burden away from you, as you have not substantiated a single one of your claims, and are blatantly dodging our arguments. You’re comprising the dialectic by refusing to engage in meaningful debate, and if you intend to continue doing so, I’ll accept the concession via burden of the rejoinder.