that already is same tech same suit and there’s even a statement that spidey helped him build it
A) Its made by Stark, but it lacks an Arc Reactor, which is primarily what makes so many of Tony's armours so powerful. The "same tech" argument isn't really valid here. Also I dunno why you're saying there's a statement about Peter helping him build it. Even if there was...why would that matter? Peter doesn't have Tier 6 prep time LMAO
everything your saying is head canon nothing is ever stated that it’s weaker nothing is ever implied that it’s weaker what are you even talking 1 civil war suit doesn’t apply to this and 2 your taking it out of context not designed for combat doesn’t mean it can’t be used for combat it which is literally shown by the fact his suit has missiles lasers repulsors a uni beam strong enough to vape Bucky arm its like saying war machine suit isn’t built for combat when its loaded with sonics tons of guns and missiles etc the CW suit is at best a unquantifiable nerf that you can’t factually prove how much weaker it is nor what the nerf is without head canon
B)
Ahem. Headcanon, you said? Right, okay, sure. I'll just let that official scan sit with you there
Yes, obviously any Iron Man suit is gonna be strong regardless of its purpose. But the truth is, its literally a weaker suit than most of Tony's arsenal
Also don’t mention head canon when everything you say is head canon you have to prove that the iron spider is millions of times weaker when 1 nothing is ever stated 2 nothing is ever shown like that 3 using common sense and not mental gymnastics tells us it’s similar
You keep talking about people using headcanons and this and that, but you're the one who keeps doing the following:
-Stonewalling any legitimate counterarguments
-Creating strawmen against every counterargument
-Not actually providing solid proof when people ask you for evidence
-Randomly tossing in supposedly strong supporting evidence for your cases that you just didn't put in your OPs
-Linking feats that don't even have calcs, and aren't even applicable to AP/Durability (I'm referring to the Grand Canyon and New York "crushing" Spider-Man or whatever you claimed in your recent revision thread)
-Failing to address the other aspects that this kind of scaling would be affected by your claims (ex. Post-Amp Luke Cage, Power Suit Diamondback, Black Sky Elektra's durability, Daniel Rand's Iron Fist attacks)
-Ignoring discussion rules on the site
-Claiming people who have contributed to like 20 different upgrades for the cinematic Spider-Men's AP and abilities are ""plotting"" against the Spider-Men
-Never citing any new evidence brought forward
Give me a fvcking break. You'll just keep spouting the same nonsense about us not using "common sense" and being bias just because we don't wanna mindlessly glaze all of the MCU's roster. Its always "common sense" this "head canon" that, "logic" whatever. You can't just spam those as responses and act like we'll go "Gee! When you put it like that, it all makes sense! Duh!". You have to actually explain your case and respond with legitimate evidence instead of stonewalling and acting like thats gonna actually make people agree with you more. But instead, you make half-baked revision threads, ignore context, and belittle anyone who even slightly disagrees with you. This is so exhausting