- 2,080
- 431
I just want him to still play Kang
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Any legal system of human design is going to fall victim to human error, and the US legal system is no different working either way, but I don't want to get too into this so I'll just leave it at that.I have to disagree. The only times people are found not guilty of a crime when they aren’t innocent is if there is not enough evidence to conclusively say they are guilty (When it is heavily implied they are), or evidence was tampered with / Improperly handled (OJ beat his charges “primarily” bc of this).
In this case, there are witness testimony, video evidence and medical evidence / testimony (that we know of). So if he beats this case after all this evidence is evaluated, there should be no scrutiny in “this” situation. The other allegations from his past is a separate issue and nobody has proof to substantiate them.
I acknowledge that being your opinion, but I’ll leave it alone after saying this; a legal system based on examining an evidentiary record of a person’s actions against the laws that govern them, by experts trained in interpreting those laws in front of jury of average people is FAR more sound than not.Any legal system of human design is going to fall victim to human error, and the US legal system is no different working either way, but I don't want to get too into this so I'll just leave it at that.
Doesn't mean we should doubt all trials results. What's the point of establishing trials if we decide to ignore the result and say "No, they're guilty for me, this is wrong!". Of course, it doesn't mean your assumption is wrong (it's entirely true) but that doesn't necessarily make it a general truth. I am not saying we should fully trust the institutions or that they can't make mistakes, just that we shouldn't automatically assume they all lie and cheat and their every decision is full of crap or mistaken. Like said above, we have no better system than this. It's either that or the voice of the masses and this is a guaranted return to disgusting shit like the Salem trials.Court rulings are not the end all be all determiner of whether someone is innocent in reality. Just a friendly reminder.
The problem at this point is not even how good he is as the character. The problem is that every version of the character is him now. So if he's recasted, that's going to be particulary weird and either they'll have to get an explanation for why the guy and all his variants, all of them having been shown to be identical physically, look so different or just leave it there to avoid the problem and everyone will rightfully point out this is just laziness. That or they completely change their story and toss him out altogether from the MCU. And if that happens, I prey Arishem that this will not be another Rise of Skywalker.I just want him to still play Kang
What I mean is I want the kang story to still go on and I want him to be the kang actor because I loved his performance as kang and He who remainsThe problem at this point is not even how good he is as the character. The problem is that every version of the character is him now. So if he's recasted, that's going to be particulary weird and either they'll have to get an explanation for why the guy and all his variants, all of them having been shown to be identical physically, look so different or just leave it there to avoid the problem and everyone will rightfully point out this is just laziness. That or they completely change their story and toss him out altogether from the MCU. And if that happens, I prey Arishem that this will not be another Rise of Skywalker.
Personally speaking, I don't really care for an explanation for Kang's different appearance should he be recasted, as long as the new actor's performance is good
But I saw an interesting take on how they could explain it
Tl;dr They make Victor Timely the real name of HWR and Exiled Kang, while Nathaniel Richards (new actor) is the original 31st century variant whose body is inhabited by the Temporal Aura of Exiled KangCan't read it
Personally speaking, I don't really care for an explanation for Kang's different appearance should he be recasted, as long as the new actor's performance is good
But I saw an interesting take on how they could explain it
Can you give a tldr? I dont have a twitter account and it won't let me view the rest of the thread.
Tl;dr They make Victor Timely the real name of HWR and Exiled Kang, while Nathaniel Richards (new actor) is the original 31st century variant whose body is inhabited by the Temporal Aura of Exiled Kang
That...actually sounds like a neat explanation that could work perfectlyTl;dr They make Victor Timely the real name of HWR and Exiled Kang, while Nathaniel Richards (new actor) is the original 31st century variant whose body is inhabited by the Temporal Aura of Exiled Kang
Well, some variants of Kang are aliens, as shown in the QM Post Credits. In addition to this, Monica being a CM Variant in other Universes and Loki having different looking variants set precedence for Kang having other looking Variants in verse. The contract he may have signed doesn’t change that precedence if they have to recast after the Lawsuit.The problem at this point is not even how good he is as the character. The problem is that every version of the character is him now. So if he's recasted, that's going to be particulary weird and either they'll have to get an explanation for why the guy and all his variants, all of them having been shown to be identical physically, look so different or just leave it there to avoid the problem and everyone will rightfully point out this is just laziness. That or they completely change their story and toss him out altogether from the MCU. And if that happens, I prey Arishem that this will not be another Rise of Skywalker.
Outside of speed and tiers, what remains to be discussed?The Marvels thread is dead. Like, we've decided the tiers, but not done with speeds yet
I’d give him at 45% Chance.What’s the odds he makes out of the trial and still plays kang
Why So lowI’d give him at 45% Chance.
A separate profile for the Quantum BandsOutside of speed and tiers, what remains to be discussed?
It was 50/50 imo, but the judge refusing to dismiss brings it down to 45% for me.Why So low
Doesn’t he have a lot of evidence on his side thoIt was 50/50 imo, but the judge refusing to dismiss brings it down to 45% for me.
Apparently some “witnesses” said his Lawyers lied about their statements and everything, and even the Judge, after seeing said evidence, refused to dismiss the case against him. So… I’m all about innocent until proven guilty but, he gonna have to box these allegations.Doesn’t he have a lot of evidence on his side tho
Looked back at frigga funeral for the Star stuff.
(1:15)
If you look at the center of the nebula(or whatever it is) you’ll see after hemidall looks up, it like 7 stars shining brightly
he gonna have to box these allegations.
Could be a good idea, at least to meA separate profile for the Quantum Bands
Yes, we've seen how Kamala using both the Quantum Bands can produce the same amount of energy as Captain Marvel, and we also have "It can produce the same amount of energy as the Sun" from Bruno which is consistentCould be a good idea, at least to me
This has been rejected twice, so I don't think it will be accepted to be usedwe also have "It can produce the same amount of energy as the Sun" from Bruno
Didn't watch the movie but I don't really have a big problem about it. The movie also apparently has Napoleon attending Louis XVI's execution which wasn't the case in real life so it's clear Scott is taking open liberties with history and is not really trying to outright tell a real-life accurate story.Thoughts?