Based on your last comment on that thread I believed that you had given up on the purpose of the CRT. If you still have more to say I can reopen it, even if it's just as a last response since that's proper debate courtesy.
Headcanon or variation of that word was only used three times in thqt thread and only twice if you don't Include quotation boxes. Of those two instances you said it once and I said that the subject you called headcanon was just canon material according to WoG.
I said that the feat doesn't match up with what you're suggesting. The Bifrost doesn't operate like a real wormhole, the MCU has canon static wormhole positions and the object it's based on stabilizes quantum tunneling to open a portal.
I'm the only one who addressed it and I never said headcanon. I did call it an outlier because claiming Thor is universal is indeed an outlier.
But for the plot the Reality Stone was going to manipulate and change reality. It's not an AP feat you can scale to anyone.
This was addressed with in-universe material. The power stone's power is dependent on target size. The Neutron Star Thor withstood was also an ancient one with far less heat than a young Neutron Star.
The gravity aspect has been tried on a couple upgrade threads but it's hard to get anywhere when the scene rather consistently breaks physics.
The numbers you gave were bare minimum solar system busting and at the maximum universal. If you were asking for a 4-C upgrade you used possibly the worst examples for that upgrade (besides Zeus).
First off you posted a response critiquing my final post on my original star-level MCU Thor calc thread then locked it, instead of just locking it after my final post, so in effect you allowed yourself to get the last word. I also did not name or tag anyone when I posted here after that, because I did not want to make it personal. My reason for posting on this L&T Spoilers thread was about concerns with the internal rules for calc logic of VS Battles. Apologies if anyone here felt attacked since that was very much not my goal.
But it seems to me that VS Battles saying I'm wrong to use NASA data on the power needed for Einstein-Rosen Bridge wormholes when calculating the Bifrost does amount to me indulging in "headcanon." But if you prefer "wank" or some other term then so be it.
Either way, I do believe that it is illogical for VS Battles to ignore actual real world science and onscreen statements that the MCU movies provide concerning their characters. I also think it is illogical to do so in the face of multiple feats across multiple movies, for the same character.
The first and last Thor movie explicitly define the Bifrost as an Einstein-Rosen Bridge wormhole, and NASA explicitly defines that as star-level in power. Even stronger, NASA's definition of an ERB wormhole involves black holes, and NASA states that black holes can cause stars to orbit them and suck in stars. People before me on forums have said those glowing white dots that move toward the hole in Thor 1 are stars. None of this seems like a leap to me, just strongly connected supporting evidence.
Thor 2 explicitly states that Malekith was going to use an Infinity Stone to destroy the universe, and that by the time Thor stopped him Malekith had less than a minute to do it before the Convergence ended. So universal destruction would have occurred very quickly. Whether through transmutation or straight up snuffing stars, the energy required for universal destruction is at least star level.
NASA states that elemental transmutation is real and requires energy. Also, in the opening of Thor 2, Odin calls the Aether "an ancient force of infinite destruction." The explosion KOed Thor for 1 minute.
Thor 4 has Eitri explicitly state that Thor took "the full force of a star." Eitri is the most informed and reliable in-universe character on the power of Nidavellir. The movie also has Thor state that Nidavellir is a neutron star. NASA and the US Department of Energy state that the average neutron star is many times hotter than the sun, both surface temperatures and core temperatures. To ignore the onscreen statement of someone who operates the star, and ignore the real-world temperatures about that type of star, and ignore Thor survive the star, is ridiculous.
Look, I understand that VS Battles has an internal culture and policies that posters here will abide. I just think that it is worthwhile to take a step back every so often and re-evaluate whether that culture and those policies really make sense. This is the case in all aspects of life, whether political parties or companies or online communities. If this comment gets dismissed and attacked, so be it. But recognize that this website is publicly available and many viewers read your calcs with the hope they are based in reality and not groupthink.
One last point. That WoG creator you cited who says the comics are canon to the movies, Will Corona Pilgrim. He works on comics and interactive exhibits for Marvel but he does not have any writer, director, or producer credits for any MCU movies or Disney+ shows. Of course he would say the comics are canon.
His own website shows the extent of his work for Marvel ,
as does his IMBD page.
