- 5,084
- 2,917
No, the crystal is a world of it's own, separate from reality. It is the sanctuary/ precinct/ divine domain of Nafta the God of the Future.the thing in the crystal are just possibilities and not actual worlds, the crystal can cause the possibilities to materialize in the actual world which is it job,
Divine Domains/ Sanctuaries are the Manifestation of a God's OrderMisha points in front of me.
Scattered like stars across the brilliant azure sky are a variety of colorful landscapes: golden volcanoes, white lakes, thorny lands, and wheel-like cities.
"This is the azure sky of the gods. Every landscape you see is a divine domain."
It is the same as the Budding Divine City of Ennesuone or the Limited World of Nafta.
Even if the OP is right and the future's don't physically exist and are mere possibilities, this is defeated by the fact that the Future World Exists (Kandaquizorte). In other words, it's the embodiment/manifestation of separate infinite possibilities.'“Hmm, why did you create a town when you tried to give birth to Enne-chan?”
Eleonore raises the question.
"The city is the embodiment of the order of Ennesuone, like the Land of Traces possessed by the God of Traces or the Limited World of Nafta."
I will skip over the rest of the points in the OP as for one no new evidence has been presented and everything here has been gone over in the past thread were the rating was given. Instead I will bring up a point that was the crux of the failure to disprove the fact that these futures actually exist which was not included in the OP for some reason (they probably forgot) and that point is the mechanism behind how the God of Future sees the future.
The OP simply writes it off as Nafta simply has precognition, that they are just able to see the future however, that is fundamentally incorrect.
There's is an explanation given as to how they are able to view the future which is this
Basically, there's a blind spot in Nafta's divine eye that see's the future and that is a future without Nafta.Then, with my blade, I slashed through Diedrich's divine eye.
"......Guahhhhhh......!!!!"
Fresh blood splatters, and Diedrich loses his light.
His body is possessed by the God of the Future. Nafta's divine eye has lost sight of the future.
The spear of Kandaquisorte that had pierced me corroded black and crumbled into tatters.
If we cannot see the future, we cannot limit it.
[...]
"...but...but...wh-why...?"
Diedrich questioned, as if puzzled.
"Why didn't Nafta's divine eye see this future ......?"
[...]
"Isn't ...... Nafta's blind spot a future without her?"
"The present, which Nafta cannot see, cannot be seen as the future, even by Nafta in an earlier time."
This is what she had said just a few minutes ago.
"In this future that we have arrived at, a part of Nafta's order, her divine eye, is absent. In other words, it was a blind spot that the past Nafta could not see."
It's a terribly simple logic.
If you destroy the divine eye, you cannot see the future. Nor from the past.
However, because they had the divine eye that could see the future, Nafta and Diedrich were only looking at it and did not think of that fact.
If she were to be killed or not exist in one future, she will not be able to see it and the reason for that is made clear.
Nafta in the past sees the future because a Nafta in the present is seeing that present. Simply, she sees the future through the eyes of her future self which is why if she doesn't exist in one instance, the Nafta of the Past will not see it. Conversely, if you were to destroy her divine eye in the present, her past self will not be able to see that moment and the one's beyond it after her eyes are destroyed (until they heal of course).
So with that said, permit me to ask everyone here, if the many futures she sees don't actually exist and is a mere possibility until she materializes them, how has she been able to see the future?
Honestly my reaction each time you bring this up is "wtf!".Aside the fact that if this was true, this means everything is branching out infinitely, that would mean there are uncountable infinite Anos existing somewhere in some timelines, Anos that are as strong as the current one and stronger even. And this current anos was able to kill all uncountable infinite of those anos.
Practically literally infinite timelines exists and infinite of those crystals exists and each also hold infinite timelines and like that, till you get to low 1-A, and to say the least there is no proof of that and it is just BS.
It's not an infinite recurring amount of infinite futures with each containing infinite futures as you're proposing. I'd simply propose it as a kind of loop i guess such that Nafta's Kandaquizorte (Kn) is a superset containing other Kandaquizorte's (n1, 2, 3, 4...) but not that any single element (nx) in (Kn) will be a superset of it's own containing (n1.1, 1.2...), (n2.1, 2.2...) but will rather always contain ((Kn)-(nx))thus the overall elements never increase and stay the same.
Now what I typed might end up being absolutely incomprehensible and stupid but I'm not even a regular not to mention a master at stuff like this so i have no other clue on how to represent it. Hopefully someone understands and does it for me.
Going by occam's razor, my interpretation is the right one
I'm not privy to the recent tier 2 revisions neither am I confident in my capacity to understand them so I honestly don't know how it'll turn out but from what I can understand according to what i read here about DT's statement, if timelines that branch off another don't meet again at any point in time then they qualify as a separate infinite time of their own, did i get this right?
Continuing on the assumption that I got it correctly, the infinite futures here do not branch off from another one.
The way the story goes is that everything is according to Order. For anything an Order governs, Order must have existed before it before that thing can exist. Order is also providence (Fate), is unchangeable and has long been predetermined thus, the future has existed long before time itself and as such, it can not be said to have branched off from any point of time and so I rest my case here.
I will not be entertaining any replies until @ImmortalDread has concluded her research and analysis of the semantics and is ready to give her opinion on the matter to avoid cluttering the thread and I ask that others please do the same as well.
Last edited: