Maou Gakuin Discussion Rule

[Dereck03]

A few days ago Daimaou and now another Maou? Well as promised I'm here to make this discussion rule for Maou Gakuin no Futekigousha.

Mainly referring to the statement that Venuzdonoa which can destroy all things in creation. No matter how tough, eternal or infinite it is being taken as "No Limits Fallacy" and one more equating "all things in the creation" to just one universe and saying that the silver sea is not part of the creation nor that Anos had any knowledge of it when making that claim.

Practically me and the supporters are already tired of discussing the same thing and the same thing all this time and most likely if I don't make this discussion rule now, in the future the same thread will repeat itself and reach hundreds of posts of debates of the same thing that has already been discussed to be rejected again.

So the rules would be this

• It is respectfully requested that any attempts to initiate or perpetuate discussions regarding the downgrade of Venuzdonoa's Tier 1 rating in the series Maou Gakuin be abstained from. The previous discussions have thoroughly examined the specific evidence presented, and it is believed that further debate on this matter would be redundant and unproductive. It is emphasized that the Silver Sea should be considered a part of the creation and that the argument of Anos being unaware of its existence is flawed , as he was involved in a multitude of matters where his awareness may have been limited. Since everything has been discussed here, here, here and here, the threads have been very controversial and even more so the most recent one but they have been completely rejected with practically 1500 post of debate between the 4 threads of practically the same as the past attempts. Additionally, it is worth noting that the claim of Venuzdonoa being treated as a "No Limits Fallacy" is outdated, as the character has demonstrated the ability to destroy everything it has encountered in the series so far, and is supported by a number of feats that can be easily verified in its profile.

On Side Note: It is respectfully urged that all comments and discussions within this thread remain on topic and refrain from any irrelevant or unnecessary remarks that may deviate from the main purpose of the thread, which is to discuss and establish a new rule among staff members. Derailing the thread with irrelevant or unnecessary remarks will not only be unproductive, but also disruptive to the intended purpose of the thread, which is for staff members to discuss and establish a new rule. As this thread is intended for staff members only, it is kindly requested that all comments and discussions stay on topic.

 

[Dereck03]

Oh no, this is deader than my desire to get up early for work.

@Antvasima could you help me here?

 

[Antvasima]

@SomebodyData @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Mr._Bambu @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @GyroNutz @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X

Would any of you be willing to help evaluate this suggestion please?

 

[Sir_Ovens]

Looks good to me.

 

[Dereck03]

 

[Antvasima]

@SomebodyData @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Mr._Bambu @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions

Your input would be appreciated here.

 

[Damage3245]

I'm not knowledgeable on the verse, but the rule seems okay to me unless anyone can provide a reason otherwise.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for helping out.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Looks good to me.

 

[Antvasima]

I think that the support here seems sufficient to apply the rule now.

 

[Dereck03]

Sure, i've applied this and can be closed now, thanks everyone for the help.

 

[Antvasima]

No problem, and thanks from me as well.

I will close this thread now then.