Kingdom Hearts Low 2-C Upgrade

[Bobsican]

Oops, it was this one

 

[Nehz_XZX]

Oops, it was this one

Okay, that link works for me.

 

[Antvasima]

@M3X @Executor_N0 @Wokistan @Armorchompy @Mr._Bambu @Jasonsith

What do you think? Would holding back an attack from a Low 2-C character qualify as Immeasurable lifting strength? It seems unreliable to me, given that we have generally treated lifting strength as a separate quantity, due to extreme inconsistencies in fiction regarding this area.

 

[M3X_2.0]

I have no knowledge on this.

 

[Armorchompy]

@M3X @Executor_N0 @Wokistan @Armorchompy @Mr._Bambu @Jasonsith

What do you think? Would holding back an attack from a Low 2-C character qualify as Immeasurable lifting strength? It seems unreliable to me, given that we have generally treated lifting strength as a separate quantity, due to extreme inconsistencies in fiction regarding this area.

We separate striking strength and lifting strength, and if I remember correctly it was agreed that catching a punch did not scale to LS.

More importantly though, going by the same logic any Low 2-C character can output 4-D energy and as such has Immeasurable LS, which definitely doesn't work.

 

[Antvasima]

Yes, that is my view as well. It seems safest to scale the lifting strengths from other feats then.

 

[Bobsican]

We separate striking strength and lifting strength, and if I remember correctly it was agreed that catching a punch did not scale to LS.

More importantly though, going by the same logic any Low 2-C character can output 4-D energy and as such has Immeasurable LS, which definitely doesn't work.

Does this includes blocking beams, projectiles and strikes on that level?
Damage did consider the second one as valid for this purpose.

 

[Armorchompy]

Does this includes blocking beams, projectiles and strikes on that level?

Second may be valid but refer to my second point. Literally almost all tier 2 and above verses would get Immeasurable LS based off this logic.

 

[Bobsican]

Okay, I've checked the CRT in question where this concern was brought up, and while I have some concerns on it, that'll be for another thread.
I'd request to close this thread as it'd be concluded then, but there's still the matter of editing the pages to match what was accepted and all.

 

[Antvasima]

Yes, let's wait until the pages have been updated according to what has been accepted here.

Tell us here when you are done.

 

[Bobsican]

Also, I probably can use some help in rather basic clean-up.
As I've mentioned before, I said the Immeasurable LS stuff here out of a concern after some editing, and while I'm sorry and all, I don't think I'll have the time to update the rest of the profiles and fix what now is indeed a mistake (Aka, several characters got Immeasurable LS added and requires clean-up).

However, I know exactly which are affected:
From the category, everything alphabethically before "Leon (Kingdom Hearts)", aka, Larxene and anything prior is affected. Help on turning them back to Class M from this feat that was already accepted as Class M would be appreciated.

 

[Starbrand_Fan]

Also, I probably can use some help in rather basic clean-up.
As I've mentioned before, I said the Immeasurable LS stuff here out of a concern after some editing, and while I'm sorry and all, I don't think I'll have the time to update the rest of the profiles and fix what now is indeed a mistake (Aka, several characters got Immeasurable LS added and requires clean-up).

However, I know exactly which are affected:
From the category, everything alphabethically before "Leon (Kingdom Hearts)", aka, Larxene and anything prior is affected. Help on turning them back to Class M from this feat that was already accepted as Class M would be appreciated.

Done

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for helping out. What, if anything, is currently left to do here then?

 

[Bobsican]

There's still the matter of updating several other pages. I'll get to that in the following days.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Thank you for helping out.

 

[DBZMLP12345]

I was wondering why the KH Donald, Goofy and Beast profiles were Low 2-C, anyway, i never agreed with the previous High 6-A downgrade, so i agree 100% with the Low 2-C upgrade

 

[Nehz_XZX]

I was wondering why the KH Donald, Goofy and Beast profiles were Low 2-C, anyway, i never agreed with the previous High 6-A downgrade, so i agree 100% with the Low 2-C upgrade

Yeah, the Low 2-C edits are still ongoing.

 

[Antvasima]

Tell us here when they are done please.

 

[Nehz_XZX]

Tell us here when they are done please.

Sure, though it is Bobsican who is making them right now.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay, no problem.

 

[The_Smashor]

Well, just having read the blog, I'm convinced.

 

[Nehz_XZX]

Well, just having read the blog, I'm convinced.

The revision has already been accepted. It's currently in the process of being applied.

 

[The_Smashor]

Ah

 

[The_Smashor]

 

[Bobsican]

I'd normally would appreciate help on the editing, but there's the application of some other CRTs while I'm on it, so I'd rather apply it myself to keep consistency on this regard.

 

[ArkhamDC06]

I'm late but I agree with this

 

[Bobsican]

Okay, this has been applied and the thread can be closed.

Now move onto the real deal : V

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Thank you to everybody who helped out here.