Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some are alreadyI ntangibility.Shouldn`t there be types of incorporeality. It should be divivded into:
Energy beings
Psionic
Data
Elemental
Being incorporeal is very different than Intangibility, as an intangible being's body is their true bodySome are alreadyI ntangibility.
Same, both are fine, I was a bit dubious on her creating the cloak because she was crouching down and not totally visible, but the item itself is bigger than the iron bar.I think Momo is a good choice.
If you're looking for something big, then perhaps this? Either is fine with me.
You need to link in this manner:I think Momo is a good choice.
If you're looking for something big, then perhaps this? Either is fine with me.
Agreed.I don't think splitting Incorporeality into types is necessary, honestly.
May I ask why? I've seen on the wiki that the format AKM Sama uses is the one favoured more in pages, for instance.
FANDOM, for some reason, prevents linking images in that manner. The image won't show up now if you click on the link I used.May I ask why? I've seen on the wiki that the format AKM Sama uses is the one favoured more in pages, for instance.
It seems this got forgotten looking back.Regarding this, pocket realities of universal size isn't unheard of, so I don't think we should say that any pocket reality that is universal (or above, given tier 1 versions of them existing as well), stop being pocket realities. All pocket realities of the size of a universe are a universe, but not all universes are pocket realities, in simple terms.
Because of the above, the wording could be better suited as:
"Pocket Realities are places for which space is separate from the regular space of any full universe, cosmological structure or other reality except for themselves."
I'm not too sure on this myself, so I would like to see what others think.
Not really? Pocket realities don't seem to work like that, and while one that is "infinitely wide" inside could qualify for High 3-A or Low 2-C with further details and so on, that doesn't stop it from being a pocket reality. That's like saying that a planet that's of the size of a universe is no longer a planet, even thought the only change is size.I personally strongly think that the requirement that pocket universes should be of considerably less than universal size should remain, as that is largely the entire point of the page.
All pocket realities of the size of an universe are an universe, but not all universes are pocket realities.If a pocket reality reaches universal size, it is plain universe creation. That is all.