-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Improving contents of Powers & Abilities pages
- Thread starter SamanPatou
- Start date
-
- Tags
- vs battles wiki
- 9,351
- 8,167
- Thread starter
- #484
I would have preferred a scene of Momo creating something big, like the cannons, but there are way less clear scenes than what I used to remember.
- 10,971
- 4,941
Shouldn`t there be types of incorporeality. It should be divivded into:
Energy beings
Psionic
Data
Elemental
Energy beings
Psionic
Data
Elemental
- 6,605
- 4,155
Some are alreadyI ntangibility.
- 10,971
- 4,941
Being incorporeal is very different than Intangibility, as an intangible being's body is their true body
They are different powers
Bobsican
He/Him- 21,633
- 6,277
Types would just encourage to list the power with no explanation, and with how varied the power is, it would be best to not make up types, especially considering that it would require a site-wide revision to revise the pages with incorporeality just to see what type they may fit, when just listing another power or describing it in the page is more explicit and fitting.
- 9,351
- 8,167
- Thread starter
- #491
Same, both are fine, I was a bit dubious on her creating the cloak because she was crouching down and not totally visible, but the item itself is bigger than the iron bar.
I don't think splitting Incorporeality into types is necessary, honestly.
- 167,891
- 76,534
The first example is fine, and the second likely acceptable.
- 167,891
- 76,534
- 167,891
- 76,534
Agreed.
Bobsican
He/Him- 21,633
- 6,277
May I ask why? I've seen on the wiki that the format AKM Sama uses is the one favoured more in pages, for instance.
- 11,135
- 14,120
FANDOM, for some reason, prevents linking images in that manner. The image won't show up now if you click on the link I used.
- 9,351
- 8,167
- Thread starter
- #500
So, is it fine to apply these? I don't know which is better between the two Momo's gifs, in the first the focus is more on her, in the second on the curtain.
- 9,351
- 8,167
- Thread starter
- #504
I replaced the images on Morality Manipulation, Invisibility and Creation, please check if the size of each of them is good enough.
- 15,441
- 5,031
I made 1 of the revisions I said I would before, for those interested.
- 9,351
- 8,167
- Thread starter
- #508
The image we have on the Standard Equipment page is quite literally the opposite of the article itself. That is Link holding all (or at least most) of the items and weapons he collected throughout all the Zelda games, ignoring that Link isn't always the same person and that he doesn't always has the same items. It's basically a composite standard equipment image, which could even include some optional stuff, who knows.
I suggest to replace it with this image. It's still Link, from Zelda 1 precisely, and on top of it being official art, he also carries the items he collects and that you are expected to possess at the end of the game. All of this stuff is standard for thing Link and the drawing itself shows them well.
I suggest to replace it with this image. It's still Link, from Zelda 1 precisely, and on top of it being official art, he also carries the items he collects and that you are expected to possess at the end of the game. All of this stuff is standard for thing Link and the drawing itself shows them well.
- 9,351
- 8,167
- Thread starter
- #511
Being a joke shouldn't be a factor for an image placed on a serious page, which is even rather important for the wiki.
I chose the other one because it's still Link and by itself is an almost goofy image, given all the stuff he carries, but it's also a serious and official drawing accurate to the game.
And having a "Composite equipment Link", especially when Composite Link himself doesn't exist anymore, to represent the concept of Standard Equipment is against the purpose of the page itself.
I chose the other one because it's still Link and by itself is an almost goofy image, given all the stuff he carries, but it's also a serious and official drawing accurate to the game.
And having a "Composite equipment Link", especially when Composite Link himself doesn't exist anymore, to represent the concept of Standard Equipment is against the purpose of the page itself.
Bobsican
He/Him- 21,633
- 6,277
It seems this got forgotten looking back.
Thoughts on this for the Pocket Reality Manipulation page? As said before, this aims on adding a basic description on what a pocket reality even is for our purposes, after all, not all verses explicitly call them like this nor necessarily stick to what we think (there's not even a written definition right now), and so some criteria to determine what qualifies as one is required for the purpose of tiering and so on.
Feel free to click the quote link to follow the previous discussion.
Perhaps it could also say instead:
"Pocket Realities are places for which space is separate from the regular space of any full universe, cosmological structure or other reality except for themselves. Their size is pretty variable and is dependant on the demostrated scale based on showcasing, context or statements, and having a separate time from the place that "hosts" it (such as an universe) isn't necessary to qualify"
This description avoids some common misconceptions while keeping it clear and to the point for our purposes.
Last edited:
- 167,891
- 76,534
@DontTalkDT @SomebodyData @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Andytrenom
What do you think about Bobsican's suggestions regarding the pocket reality creation page in the post above?
What do you think about Bobsican's suggestions regarding the pocket reality creation page in the post above?
- 10,758
- 6,491
I'm fine with acknowledging that pocket realities can be universal in size but I don't know what the most accurate description of a pocket reality would be
- 19,186
- 6,471
I am fine with Bob's suggestion.
Bobsican
He/Him- 21,633
- 6,277
Not really? Pocket realities don't seem to work like that, and while one that is "infinitely wide" inside could qualify for High 3-A or Low 2-C with further details and so on, that doesn't stop it from being a pocket reality. That's like saying that a planet that's of the size of a universe is no longer a planet, even thought the only change is size.
Bobsican
He/Him- 21,633
- 6,277
All pocket realities of the size of an universe are an universe, but not all universes are pocket realities.
In other words, it still would be a pocket reality out of its nature, unlike a "regular" universe.
Similar threads
