GodlyCharmander
He/Him- 5,744
- 4,998
Isn't this too subjective? "Well, after this point, it's simply too much higher than the highest feat"
Which scaling x feat discrepancy is too large for us to consider?
Would 10x not be considered a large discrepancy?
Would 100x not be considered a large discrepancy?
Why would we stop at "well, 450 times faster than the fastest feat is fair game, but beyond that is too absurd"? Why isn't a 450 times discrepancy considered too much?
I am sorry, but this seems very arbitrary. If we are going by that mindset, the cap should be either immensely lower (at most FTL), or non existent, imo.
Which scaling x feat discrepancy is too large for us to consider?
Would 10x not be considered a large discrepancy?
Would 100x not be considered a large discrepancy?
Why would we stop at "well, 450 times faster than the fastest feat is fair game, but beyond that is too absurd"? Why isn't a 450 times discrepancy considered too much?
I am sorry, but this seems very arbitrary. If we are going by that mindset, the cap should be either immensely lower (at most FTL), or non existent, imo.