- 182
- 17
If you're referring to the thread that I made in the Content Revision section, that's probably the way some people interpreted it, but it's just not true. Most of the replies were "Oh mai gawd this is dumb", or "this thread is garbage", or "No, he wasn't angry! This is stupid". They were just terribly substantive.SomebodyData said:@PFM Pretty sure you were debunked in a thread before by nearly everyone in the thread. Sorry if its the wrong person, but if you can't even prove your arguments, its pretty petty to just continue to complain.
The only person that made any semblance of a counterargument used "evidence" that was blatantly false. The dialogue he used as evidence was factually false, and the order of events was not as he described, and his whole argument depended on these things being true. Basically, I did debunk this entire premise but this site didn't want to accept it.
Also, there's no such thing as "proof" of anyone's argument. All of these arguments are inherently subjective, it's a matter of who has a stronger argument, not who can definitely prove anything. This is not mathematical induction, there's no such proof.