- 10,220
- 11,656
Yes. With me now being mod and I agreed with it, we had solid agreement from 3 staffs.
With Firestorm's input we got 4 (although he leaned more for a likely/possibly)
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100
- Thread starter Warren_Valion
- Start date
With Firestorm's input we got 4 (although he leaned more for a likely/possibly)
- 6,631
- 6,815
I just realized that with Syn Shenron being 2-C, then that means that SSG Shallot and Giblet would also be 2-C...
- 6,631
- 6,815
And here I was getting excited over Shallet being possibly Low 2-C with Dragons Low 2-C thread lol.
- 5,737
- 3,248
Can't wait to see Janemba and Moro having infinite speed hehehehe
- 9,982
- 10,821
Yeah, with Infinite Universe being accepted, edge do not exist. Although, it'll take a note on why edge arguement is not valid on profiles ig.
- 10,220
- 11,656
thetechmaster36
He/Him- 1,823
- 1,740
High 3-A BoG Goku, I can accept that because the infinite universe was accepted. 3 Universes 2-C, though? I mean, you'd be a little hard-pressed to outright prove that the cosmologies are the exact same to a T.
I don't keep up anymore (because let's be real here, debating Dragon Ball is the fastest way to get brain damage on this site) so for all I know, the cosmologies are the same across all continuities, but eh
I don't keep up anymore (because let's be real here, debating Dragon Ball is the fastest way to get brain damage on this site) so for all I know, the cosmologies are the same across all continuities, but eh
- 9,982
- 10,821
A random soldiers spouting non sense don't decide cosmology, even knowledgeable characters in ben 10 gets disregarded smh.
- 2,713
- 3,501
Should actually be 3U 2-C bog goku, for the same reason gt has it too
- 2,713
- 3,501
Okay cool, all my misunderstandings are understood now, thank you
- 12,175
- 6,114
I sent some quotes there to refute this, where Moro says that there are countless/innumerable planets and Zamasu says that there are millions of planets
- 10,220
- 11,656
This will be the main point of contention, indeed. Specially since the proof of 3U 2-C is exclusively from Toei.
By our standards, timelines can vary enough that they may not strictly scale cosmology across other timelines. Specially in DB thanks to the MWI.
thetechmaster36
He/Him- 1,823
- 1,740
Lemme clarify; I'm not concerned with how the scaling would work. What I'm concerned about is whether or not it would be accepted that the cosmologies would scale across timelines.
Like Lephyr mentioned, MWI makes it extremely difficult to actually determine whether or not the cosmologies would be the same because any one different action that is taken results in a totally different timeline where even more events can unfold from there that could inevitably result in the cosmology changing through different means (wish granting, creation in general, splitting universes, what have you).
Am I saying this is the case for Dragon Ball 100%? No, not at all. However, the circumstances makes it super shaky.
Oliver_de_jesus
He/Him- 24,642
- 17,733
He didn't cross the entire universe, it was more a Very Very large section far enough away that he couldn't teleport.
- 2,713
- 3,501
I think it was already accepted that different events doesn't equal different cosmology, even in a dbs guide the space between dimensions in gt was mentioned in a super cosmology guide, its all accepted as composite cosmology.
- 6,783
- 6,686
Shared macrocosm was already accepted in the infinite universe thread lmao
- 10,220
- 11,656
Not only that, it explicitly took him some time. So infinite flight speed is outright contradicted.
Infinite combat speed, on the other hand...
- 6,783
- 6,686
I'm fairly certain the shockwaves speed argument should apply to the manga as well
- 2,713
- 3,501
What does infinite speed have to do with time? One of the definitions for infinite speed on this site is "moving an infinite distance in finite time"
- 10,220
- 11,656
Yeah. That's the thing. Even at full speed, he couldn't cross a finite distance in 0 time, so that's the other requirement for infinite movement speed not fulfilled. Plain as day, as solid as it gets.
thetechmaster36
He/Him- 1,823
- 1,740
Uh it was? Mind pointing me to any specific posts that say so?
- 10,220
- 11,656
Which is why I agree with combat speed, indeed. (That also includes short burst flight speed mid-combat, btw)
- 9,982
- 10,821
I do not specifically understood how MWI would contradict anything regarding cosmology being same? Infact main point here is that out of all types of parallel world theory (Type 1, 2, 3, 4) Type 3 or MWI is assigned to have exact same cosmology throughout Timelines with variation in stories. Branching insures it that they were same at some point in time and to vary, there must be some cosmological event to change it (like a god like being altering all of reality and to that, just made infinite universe finite and downplayed Universe so that DBS don't scale high is ridiculous if anything), I think @Planck69 mentioned it as well, and I specifically said it in the thread where DBGT was getting accepted as alternate timeline, that if it got accepted, 2-C universe is undeniable.
- 5,308
- 6,045
Infinite travel/flight speed for Super just seems like a big no for me so I agree. GT on the other hand...
- 2,713
- 3,501
But on this wiki, there is 2 definitions of it: Able to travel any finite distance in zero time, or move an infinite distance within a finite amount of time. So if db characters apply to the latter, why would time matter? For travel speed.
- 10,220
- 11,656
He didn't travel an infinite distance. That's the point.
Only characters to truly do that are the Angels with their warp ability.
- 2,713
- 3,501
yes i know he didn't, but what would contradict that he can't? We accept combat speed and travel speed to be the same, for dbs at least. And how does it make sense to have infinite combat speed but not infinite flight speed?
- 5,308
- 6,045
Do you think it should apply to Pikkon and Goku's feat for Toei?
- 12,175
- 6,114
Just to remind you that angels can also go to the future through skills or their flight, I still don't know exactly how it works.
- 2,713
- 3,501
Immeasurable speed thread incoming lmao
- 10,220
- 11,656
Like we say in spanish:
Yeah, they I would agree.
- 6,783
- 6,686
Time Travel is most reasonable
- 10,220
- 11,656
Not how we do things here. He needs explicit feats.
- 12,175
- 6,114
Nor, I would have to explain a lot and I know basically nothing about immeasurable speed, it's hard to know because we don't have examples of it.
- 2,713
- 3,501
lol ik im just trolling
- 12,175
- 6,114
I'm on bro lol
- 2,713
- 3,501
I mean i guess, its just weird to have one but not the other, with how infinity works and all. But infinite combat, reaction, and short burst speed is fine.
Similar threads
