- 2,336
- 1,442
The very first argument was "the stone could have just fallen apart a bit after being cut", which is not relevant to verse consistency.
You have yet to address my rebuttal from the consistency of the relevant features of the boulder. So awaiting substantiation of the existence of 'minor art mistake' that gets constantly repeated unintentionally (which is again different from an outlier) before the point can be put forward. Claiming the existence of art mistakes should be based on evidence, not headcanon.
Stonewalling is ignoring valid points. I am actively engaging and countering specific points.
Claiming everyone disagrees is gaslighting; though I am the only one actively participating. Claiming that disagreement while engaging, providing evidence, and addressing rebuttals is stonewalling is simply abuse of the rules.
You have yet to address my rebuttal from the consistency of the relevant features of the boulder. So awaiting substantiation of the existence of 'minor art mistake' that gets constantly repeated unintentionally (which is again different from an outlier) before the point can be put forward. Claiming the existence of art mistakes should be based on evidence, not headcanon.
Stonewalling is ignoring valid points. I am actively engaging and countering specific points.
Claiming everyone disagrees is gaslighting; though I am the only one actively participating. Claiming that disagreement while engaging, providing evidence, and addressing rebuttals is stonewalling is simply abuse of the rules.