- 15,995
- 25,057
Agreed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
3 mods and a fair amount of regular users have given this the okay. Any objections? Otherwise this should be fine to add.
Because while Shazam has scaling potential all of his feats are magnitudes lower then scaling to the top and god tiers would actually imply. He doesn't meaningfully interact with the top tiers and is currently confined to his own scaling pocket whom all mostly have feats in this range. Wait for Black Adam and Shazam 2 before discussing upgrades.I'm not sure why Shazam is as low as 8-C, but I don't think it's assumed Shazam is above Doomsday though I don't think he should be too much weaker.
What about the "Was said to be the only one strong enough to stop Sivana, despite the existence of other heroes such as Superman"Because while Shazam has scaling potential all of his feats are magnitudes lower then scaling to the top and god tiers would actually imply. He doesn't meaningfully interact with the top tiers and is currently confined to his own scaling pocket whom all mostly have feats in this range. Wait for Black Adam and Shazam 2 before discussing upgrades.
As for this; the OP is blatantly ignoring the fact that neither Supes and Doomsday were at full strength when the nuke hit so at best this would make Shazzy High 7-C or so which is ignoring how this is basing an entire AP rating off an offhand line of dialogue from the arrogant supervillain Dr. Sivana. I agree Billy will likely scale higher but we shouldn't be using such loose reasoning to upgrade him.
This would be like making Base Thanos 5-C because he's stated "as the strongest being in the universe" based off Ego before Infinity War or Endgame came out; it simply is absolutely ridiculous. Again, I'm not saying he won't, I'm saying accepting that as absolutely the case now is arguing a case with evidence that no one has actually seen yet since the sources of that evidence has yet to even come out into cinemas with could either make or break this hypothesis.
Everything else we have is
Like if this was arguing based off guidebooks saying he's that strong or something I'd be fine with that but no it's not and I have no idea why this is currently getting the acceptance it is
- A one off statement which we are accepting as extending all the way to nukes
- A one off statement no one else could beat Sivana (hyperbolic as hell)
- A mention he's empowered by Gods even though Power Source should not equal output and that's ignoring the fact most of said Gods are featless with the exception of Zeus who is currently >> everyone else in the verse alongside Ares
I believe I mentioned that; Supes wasn't mentioned by name and that's still taking the highest interpretation of the statement as absolute fact. We'll likely get Supes scaling anyway but this is not how we do itWhat about the "Was said to be the only one strong enough to stop Sivana, despite the existence of other heroes such as Superman"
O wait missed that partI believe I mentioned that; Supes wasn't mentioned by name and that's still taking the highest interpretation of the statement as absolute fact. We'll likely get Supes scaling anyway but this is not how we do it
Oh I agree, I just think the upgrades should come when those come out and not rnO wait missed that part
O well
He should for sure get high scaling after Black Adam and shazam 2 at least
Hmmm, I see what you mean there, though that's not why Homelander isn't 7-BI disagree for 2 reasons. One, we can't assume that man-made weapons = all weapons including nukes. Otherwise, we would have 7-B Homelander since its stated that "There is no weapon on Earth that could hurt him". You would have to prove that it is consistent with his other feats. And 2, the nuke is likely, not High 7-A, since their world mirrors ours, it should be 7-B at best, considering the Superman that got crippled was still weakened by Kryptonite, and Doomsday technically tanked it.
Nukes are man made weapons, so, yeah, we can, and if u have problems with homelander, bring it to another threadI disagree for 2 reasons. One, we can't assume that man-made weapons = all weapons including nukes
I don't have an issue with Homelander, I'm saying consistency wise, we don't have 7-B Homelander since he got incapacitated by 9-A characters. In this case, neither Shazam nor Sivana have feats that high to suggest High 7-A.Nukes are man made weapons, so, yeah, we can, and if u have problems with homelander, bring it to another thread
What I meant was, he doesn't have any feats of fighting other High 7-A characters, so the best we got for him is Sivana who also doesn't have feats for fighting for High 7-A characters.Pretty sure the reason Shazam Doesn't have any feat is cuz he isn't "haha destroy Mountain time"
Idk about captain
Which Anti-Feats they have?What I meant was, he doesn't have any feats of fighting other High 7-A characters, so the best we got for him is Sivana who also doesn't have feats for fighting for High 7-A characters.
Ah AlbrightWhat I meant was, he doesn't have any feats of fighting other High 7-A characters, so the best we got for him is Sivana who also doesn't have feats for fighting for High 7-A characters.
NoneWhich Anti-Feats they have?
Yup and wouldn't be too much to just have that if no one can agreeIsn't stuff like this the reason why the "possibly" rating exists?
Cuz neither Supes nor Doomsday were High 7-A at that point, Supes was heavily weakened by kryptonite and he only went back to full strength after getting sunlight. Doomsday after getting nuked proceeded to get stronger and then fought WW and peak Supes. So 7-B seems the most reasonable by real-world standards for nukes. I mean Supes went from High 7-A to getting knocked out by 9-A attacks from Batman due to kryptonite, so he didn't recover all of his strength up until after he received sunlight.Why not High 7-A?
Shazam being hurt by getting slammed through concrete by Sivana during their fightWhich Anti-Feats they have?
Not even that, just make it a likely far higher until we get confirmationYup and wouldn't be too much to just have that if no one can agree
Not an anti-feat, as it was Sivana who throwed him, but when several cars crashed into Shazam, he wasnt hurt, meaning that it was Sivana strength that hurt himShazam being hurt by getting slammed through concrete by Sivana during their fight
Except Sivana has no feats above this level that implies he’s as strong as this thread arguesNot an anti-feat, as it was Sivana who throwed him, but when several cars crashed into Shazam, he wasnt hurt, meaning that it was Sivana strength that hurt him
He doesnt need ''''feats'''' as he has statements, and your ''anti-feat'' is not even real in first placeExcept Sivana has no feats above this level that implies he’s as strong as this thread argues
The evidence can be found in Shazam movie, man made weapons are unable to hurt themAgain wait for the sequels to come out dude; were arguing off evidence that isn’t out yet
Completely agree with this. Giving Shazam Top Tier status and ratings because of some doubtful statements is a no no. Dude has only one movie and no feats. Wait for Black Adam and Shazam 2. Even a "possible" or "likely" ratings is ridiculous.Because while Shazam has scaling potential all of his feats are magnitudes lower then scaling to the top and god tiers would actually imply. He doesn't meaningfully interact with the top tiers and is currently confined to his own scaling pocket whom all mostly have feats in this range. Wait for Black Adam and Shazam 2 before discussing upgrades.
As for this; the OP is blatantly ignoring the fact that neither Supes and Doomsday were at full strength when the nuke hit so at best this would make Shazzy High 7-C or so which is ignoring how this is basing an entire AP rating off an offhand line of dialogue from the arrogant supervillain Dr. Sivana. I agree Billy will likely scale higher but we shouldn't be using such loose reasoning to upgrade him.
This would be like making Base Thanos 5-C because he's stated "as the strongest being in the universe" based off Ego before Infinity War or Endgame came out; it simply is absolutely ridiculous. Again, I'm not saying he won't, I'm saying accepting that as absolutely the case now is arguing a case with evidence that no one has actually seen yet since the sources of that evidence has yet to even come out into cinemas with could either make or break this hypothesis.
Everything else we have is
Like if this was arguing based off guidebooks saying he's that strong or something I'd be fine with that but no it's not and I have no idea why this is currently getting the acceptance it is
- A one off statement which we are accepting as extending all the way to nukes
- A one off statement no one else could beat Sivana (hyperbolic as hell)
- A mention he's empowered by Gods even though Power Source should not equal output and that's ignoring the fact most of said Gods are featless with the exception of Zeus who is currently >> everyone else in the verse alongside Ares
He has some of Zeus' power.Completely agree with this. Giving Shazam Top Tier status and ratings because of some doubtful statements is a no no. Dude has only one movie and no feats. Wait for Black Adam and Shazam 2. Even a "possible" or "likely" ratings is ridiculous.