- 7,887
- 14,934
He was using the comic book as an analogy for non-linear perception of time, not fictionality. You're using an aspect of a comic book which was never referred to as part of the analogy. So we definitely disagree here.A comic book is fiction, yes.
And it is not the case of an entity viewing time nonlinearly, because Adam makes it completely clear it isnt, by directly comparing it to how the 3rd dimension views the 2nd, a comicbook. A fiction
This doesn't really refer to anything other than many timelines, not dimensional R>F relationships.“So they have this notion time is a line, so i thought “So thats basic geometry”. If time is a line so wouldn't that mean that there could be lots of lines on a plane? And so i drew this thing on a back of a napkin to show it to Mark Waid, and it was like a kind of junction, a train junction, with these lines each of which representing different universes, meaning, different comicbooks that contradicted one another, they could all run parallel and sometimes they crossed over, sometimes that Batman who didn't agree with that Batman agreed with him here and fit in a little bit more, so although Frank Miller's Dark Knight didn't actually fit into canon with Batman, what it did is feed some of its energy into the main Batman line to reinvigorate it. So i created this big kind of diagram that was like a loom. And then, i thought okay if that's all the comics, in fact even on that line you can have the Marvel Comics lying running along here, and sometimes it crosses over when Marvel and DC and friends, you've got this beautiful model of comicbooks as a concept as this two-dimensional plane with all these timelines running over one another."
Ditto“And then, i thought and obviously above that, taking the metaphor of the geometry higher you would have Cubetime, and in Cubetime are people like us that who are able to look down on Planetime with all the comicbook universes from a higher-dimensional perspective."
Okay, I am fully convinced this video does not indicate a belief that the Fifth Dimensions views the Orrery as fictional. That doesn't seem to be what he's getting at here at all.“So that's what Hypertime was was, it was a of geometric vision that would incorporate the real world, and the comic universe, and allow every story that was ever told to be...real? Because they are real you can go pick them up, you know, and whether the continuity contradicts or not the stories remain...real? You know and it was-all my thing And was always get to the next level of what's real and what a comic is rather then trying to pretend that i was telling stories about a world that you just couldn't get to. A special world where Superman lives that's, there is no world where Superman lives, it's on that page, and so that's what i was trying to get at."
This is just a repeat of the theory you already proposed to me. Like I said, I do not share this interpretation for the reasons I described above.Where removing imagination causes the contents of the story to be removed from existence, implying existence is literally a product of imagination, a product of the thing that shapes said contents of the story. It is R>F