• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Ben 10 Cosmology High 1-C/1-B upgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ya hence I am wondering, I was sure that the blog is outdated since 26 Dimensions is nowhere properly explained.
Wonder why fictional verses like Shinza, Gurren Lagan, DC, Fate never even explained about them yet upgraded to 1 tiers based on membranes .
 
Using whataboutsam argument won't help your case. Simply mentioning 26 dimensions without any further context won't lead to anything.
That's why I explained it using string theory which runs on membranes which proves they are actual higher dimensions.
 
Wonder why fictional verses like Shinza, Gurren Lagan, DC, Fate never even explained about them yet upgraded to 1 tiers based on membranes .
Shinza doesn't exist on the wiki anymore, I don't care about Gurren or DC, and Fate had a LOOOOOOOT more then membranes backing it's tier 1 up, if it didn't, it wouldn't be 6-D off of Avalon.
 
String Theory directly works on D Brains. Is there a rule it should be mention directly?
String theory dimensions are not applicable for Tier 1. Branes are, but without actual mention of branes or an explanation of how they function in this canon, we can't equate the 26 dimensions as actual branes regardless of the similarities in the amount of dimensions.
 
Shinza doesn't exist on the wiki anymore, I don't care about Gurren or DC, and Fate had a LOOOOOOOT more then membranes backing it's tier 1 up, if it didn't, it wouldn't be 6-D off of Avalon.
Even then, idk why he is trying to use whatsaboutsam argument for it. We are simply asking if this interpretation of him exists in canonicty's story or not.

Which in fact it is not mentioned and rather speculation. It is fair request.
 
Shinza doesn't exist on the wiki anymore, I don't care about Gurren or DC, and Fate had a LOOOOOOOT more then membranes backing it's tier 1 up, if it didn't, it wouldn't be 6-D off of Avalon.
6-D avalon inside the core of a planet..interesting though.
 
Since you answered yourself. Mind closing the thread? You are aware that this does not exist in the verse and yet you are pushing for an upgrade based on your own speculation which you admitted they don't exist in the verse?
Why do you say dimensions doesn't exist in verse? Naljian statement perfectly make sense there that those 26 Dimensions work like this as of string theory.

IMG-20221230-163632.jpg
 
Since you answered yourself. Mind closing the thread? You are aware that this does not exist in the verse and yet you are pushing for an upgrade based on your own speculation which you admitted they don't exist in the verse?
You are saying string theory in Ben 10 =/= real life string theory even though it has direct evidence implies it works like that. (26d is clearly about BST)
 
You are saying string theory in Ben 10 =/= real life string theory even though it has direct evidence implies it works like that. (26d is clearly about BST)
String theory dimensions are not applicable for Tier 1. Branes are, but without actual mention of branes or an explanation of how they function in this canon, we can't equate the 26 dimensions as actual branes regardless of the similarities in the amount of dimensions.
What's this the tenth requote? Can we go for 15?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top