- 40,470
- 12,953
Wouldn't it be better to use high end Lavos in that case? Low 1-C Lavos?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Battle for the 5th low 2C strongest smurf: Lavos vs D (Vampire Hunter D)
- Thread starter Oliver_de_jesus
- Start date
- 3,461
- 1,724
Lavos with his Low 1-C hax, or Lavos in his full Low 1-C key?
- 40,470
- 12,953
Full Low 1-C key
- 3,461
- 1,724
Could work but im not sure how it'd go down. D's only a Low 1-C smurf, not a full Low 1-C
- 10,688
- 4,810
Lavos doesn't have a key that's 2-A with Low 1-C hax.
- 6,590
- 3,423
This is a battle for a Low 2-C spot so I don't think we need Full Low 1-C Lavos
Oliver_de_jesus
He/Him- 24,730
- 17,763
- Thread starter
- #47
its absorption is low 1C in the key, dream and time devoure IIRCZephyrosOmega said:
- 1,577
- 350
Changing my vote to D now.
- 15,999
- 6,003
D FRA.
- 24,183
- 3,938
Lavos for cals reasons
- 3,461
- 1,724
What reasons?ZacharyGrossman273 said:
- 3,461
- 1,724
D erases him across the multiverse. Plus passives are a thing.Tyri456 said:
- 40,470
- 12,953
But Lavos has better passives.
- 3,461
- 1,724
and what are those passives?The real cal howard said:
- 40,470
- 12,953
Resistances. Spatial manipulation. Absorption if you make direct contact (if you don't, you're good), portals with 2-A+ range passively show up when it's around, etc.
- 3,461
- 1,724
D resists Spatial Manip and BFR and likely wont be making physical contact. He just uses the records and goes for his rewrite hax.The real cal howard said:
D starting off would automatically know everything there is to know about Lavos via Clairvoyance / Info Analysis from the records, as well as precognition. Lavos is only acausal type 3, making him vulnerable to D's Probablity, Fate, and Causality hax.
- 40,470
- 12,953
Lavos is the epitome of acausal tho. He's literally the poster boy for Acausality.
- 3,461
- 1,724
Only has Type 3 listed. Types 2 and 4 are what makes you resistant to those abilities, but not Type 3.The real cal howard said:
- 15,920
- 2,694
- 40,470
- 12,953
I can change that at a whim, Ion...
- 6,590
- 3,423
I don't think being poster boy or not changes something, he just need to have Acausality listed
If he only has Type 3, I don't think he's escaping from D
If he only has Type 3, I don't think he's escaping from D
- 40,470
- 12,953
I mean, it should probably have type 2 as well.
- 8,805
- 2,864
How exactly?The real cal howard said:
- 3,461
- 1,724
Also even if he does have the necessary Acausality Types, the Records can actually neg that acausality via forcing something into the records by writing them into it.
Furthermore given this is D's Low 2-C key, SBA dictates he's in his Armageddon key. His armageddon key has passive Low 1-C Fate Manip as well via scaling to His Father, and this negates layers of resistance and acausality.
Furthermore given this is D's Low 2-C key, SBA dictates he's in his Armageddon key. His armageddon key has passive Low 1-C Fate Manip as well via scaling to His Father, and this negates layers of resistance and acausality.
- 40,470
- 12,953
Lavos has passive anti fate hax though. Anyone who tries to fatehax it has fate fight back and prevent the character to have ever existed. Even if acausal.
- 40,470
- 12,953
Here's proof
- 3,461
- 1,724
... That text is very vague. And this isnt the place for a CRT. If you think hes missing some powers, go make one?The real cal howard said:
- 3,651
- 264
Doesn't D have resistance to EE, though?
- 3,461
- 1,724
Resists EE, Plus High-Godly that can regen from layers upon layers of Regen Neg.Dragopentling said:
- 40,470
- 12,953
The problem with Lagos it that it canonically cannibalizes its own duplicates, meaning it bypasses its own high godly.
- 3,461
- 1,724
D can still resists and regn from pretty good High-Godly neg. Especially since this is Low 2-C armageddon D.The real cal howard said:
- 3,651
- 264
How good are both sides' Regen negation?
- 40,470
- 12,953
But can it come back from high godly negating absorption?
- 3,461
- 1,724
Who said lavos was absorbing anything? You said he was erasing D via Anti-Fate hax (Which still isnt listed on his profile btw)The real cal howard said:
- 40,470
- 12,953
It is Lavos's first move. Passives, then first move. If he's not getting offEd by the passives, it's nom time.
Oliver_de_jesus
He/Him- 24,730
- 17,763
- Thread starter
- #77
Chrono bump
- 3,651
- 264
The nomming is resisted, though. D already gains most of such resistances in his previous keys, and they help him resist the effects of Akashic Records, so unless Lavos' passives and opening moves are at the high end of 5D strength or even 6D+, he's not killing D before D kills him.
Oliver_de_jesus
He/Him- 24,730
- 17,763
- Thread starter
- #79
Bump
Oliver_de_jesus
He/Him- 24,730
- 17,763
- Thread starter
- #80
Bump
Similar threads
