• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

DEATH BATTLE! Discussion Thread (All-time Death Battle Spoilers Alert)

This was dug up from before KS DB Ballot 57:
So it's basically Ben vs Hal in the sense that it only exists as an episode for one character and the other character is just also there. Ben vs Hal was so obviously made as an episode for Ben just like how fight was made for Traveler.
 
So it's basically Ben vs Hal in the sense that it only exists as an episode for one character and the other character is just also there. Ben vs Hal was so obviously made as an episode for Ben just like how fight was made for Traveler.
Id say they imply its for Aang. His comeback is the deal and Traveler is less important than introducing Genshin.
 
Man I really don't get why they did this matchup. It wasn't particularly popular (the kickstarter immediately losing all steam when it was announced should be proof of that), the debate wasn't close whatsoever, and it just looks like they're feeding Aang to Traveler which is lame on its own but you also get the optics of having a beloved character getting killed by a gacha protag in a fight nobody asked for. I just can't buy the excuse they made about this not being a matchup pushed by a specific researcher because there really is no other reasonable explanation.
The matchup actually has connections. This is Aang’s most debatable matchup.

I heard the kickstarter ‘lost steam’ because there was irl shit that made people take back donations.

The matchup was more debatable back then like it was pre Traveler getting moon scaling and stuff
 
Man I really don't get why they did this matchup. It wasn't particularly popular (the kickstarter immediately losing all steam when it was announced should be proof of that), the debate wasn't close whatsoever, and it just looks like they're feeding Aang to Traveler which is lame on its own but you also get the optics of having a beloved character getting killed by a gacha protag in a fight nobody asked for. I just can't buy the excuse they made about this not being a matchup pushed by a specific researcher because there really is no other reasonable explanation.
This is the reason.
 
Man I really don't get why they did this matchup. It wasn't particularly popular (the kickstarter immediately losing all steam when it was announced should be proof of that), the debate wasn't close whatsoever, and it just looks like they're feeding Aang to Traveler which is lame on its own but you also get the optics of having a beloved character getting killed by a gacha protag in a fight nobody asked for. I just can't buy the excuse they made about this not being a matchup pushed by a specific researcher because there really is no other reasonable explanation.
It was pretty clearly someone on staff's pet unicorn.
This was dug up from before KS DB Ballot 57:
I really doubt this is the case, like Traveler is "popular" but that's because they're the self insert character for the players of the game. Like I'm sure a few people suggested it but I really really doubt that there aren't more people requesting stuff for like Arlecchino, Raiden, Xiao or Wanderer.
 
Last edited:
Also, while advertised as such for the Story Mode, this game has no reason to fit the canon of the verse given its inconsistencies within the timeline. It is shown that the main characters kept their memories after the events of the game, which would mean Gaang already met Korra while they were kids, which makes no sense given Korra met elderly Toph in Book 4 of her series without either having any memories of each other.

Also thing is, it is officially stated to be canon so like excluding it just for that reason alone is nitpicking, its not like it changes things much given the scaling consistency
Meh even then changes nothing overall but I agree
Man I really don't get why they did this matchup. It wasn't particularly popular (the kickstarter immediately losing all steam when it was announced should be proof of that), the debate wasn't close whatsoever, and it just looks like they're feeding Aang to Traveler which is lame on its own but you also get the optics of having a beloved character getting killed by a gacha protag in a fight nobody asked for. I just can't buy the excuse they made about this not being a matchup pushed by a specific researcher because there really is no other reasonable explanation.
Who cares honestly ? They wanted to test the waters for Gacha mu and felt this was best one to do
Episode comes out tomorrow we been bitching for like a year over this
Shouldn't have been a episode to begin with, waste of a spot.
Let's see if the fight sucks before shooting
 
Really? I thought you were in your 80s or 90s with how grouchy you are
Don't make such boorish comments towards people unprompted. I assume you have had some conflict with them in the past - evidently, you decided to bring that here, to a comment that had nothing to do with you, for little explicable reason. If you can't be sensible with people you don't like, then you won't be here much longer.
 
Thats..thats the joke. Bruh

icon-15.gif
 
Don't make such boorish comments towards people unprompted. I assume you have had some conflict with them in the past - evidently, you decided to bring that here, to a comment that had nothing to do with you, for little explicable reason. If you can't be sensible with people you don't like, then you won't be here much longer.
I already got that message from Random Helper and backed off:
I'm gonna be honest I didn't even notice BD snapped at me, but point taken on jokes with the guy: just don't.
As for the other part of the comment... my vitriol with BD was years ago, I don't hold that much of a grudge, the joke was old man=cranky stereotype. The one that's been done to death since the 1960s. He then snapped at me, I made that comment, and I haven't interacted since.
 
Last edited:
I can get but again changes nothing
Obviously, none argues that, but we talking on the debate over canonicity, the game wouldnt be stated officially to be canon to the series without permission, since they just make a game on an IP

So I dunno why they felt like it shouldnt count for such a nitpicky thing, direct sequels to a series may have more inconsistencies on them, yet nobody will say they are non canon now
 
We literally selectively ignore anti-feats, if fans want they can ignore the game.

Although VS fans are degenerate so it will prolly be wanked and used in future instead :V
 
Honestly, even if you included the game and his latest movie, I don’t think it’ll move the needle much for Aang lmao
 

Latest posts

Back
Top