- 17,141
- 26,840
This should be a pretty simple thread its basically fixing a mistake from this thread here that misinterpreted a calc therefore wrongfully removed scaling on a calc from the verse which just needs to be restore now. The calc itself is representing that a single case by itself was 8-A. Rusty has said as much (he also literally did the calc) and Chariot agreed to that, this is what the CRT misunderstood. We thought it was representing that the overall explosion was 8-A not that a single case was 8-A, literally just a fundamental misunderstanding of the calc itself so this again as said previous is moreso just a restoration of the previous ratings.
There was also previously some concern whether or not we treat simultaneous explosives packed together in a case the way they are here as a combined overall yield and in a case like this it was determined that this is fine as well.
TDLR: Previous rating was removed from a misunderstanding and is fine to keep
IDK what happened with it, but I did speak to Chariot about the calculation back in July. He seemed alright with the 8-A scaling to the Queen Lancer.
I feel like there is confusion regarding the calc. People seem to think all of the cases exploding was 8-A, which is wrong. A single case is worth 8-A, I didn't know how to factor in those multiple explosions. The Queen Lancer wouldn't even scale to the full explosive energy of all the cases combined.
But I believed a single case explosion is acceptable, which is the 8-A value I got above.
If there was another issue I'm unaware of it as I've not been keeping track. But it felt like people were still misunderstanding this so I wanted to clear this part up.
There was also previously some concern whether or not we treat simultaneous explosives packed together in a case the way they are here as a combined overall yield and in a case like this it was determined that this is fine as well.
TDLR: Previous rating was removed from a misunderstanding and is fine to keep