- 14,666
- 20,358
Since Luffy doesn’t have prior offenses and isn’t intentionally malicious, I think a warning should suffice here.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 29,748
- 24,723
I agree. It does look like vote manipulation was attempted here, however well-intentioned it was, and this deserves a stern warning.
- 10,300
- 5,145
If have to apply something, i want you to do it, because i have a lot of respect for you.
Furthermore, i would like to ask you to ban my account forever, because i cannot bear to be in the same place as an extremely toxic person like Omega and to avoid unnecessary fights for me it's good, i think this is enough for me
Since no one looked at Omega's offenses, i would much rather be permanently banned than stay in a place where someone has so much hate.
- 11,208
- 12,538
Stop filling up the RVR needlessly.
You, @LuffyRuffy46307 , if you want to get a self-imposed ban, request on an admin wall.
You, @LuffyRuffy46307 , if you want to get a self-imposed ban, request on an admin wall.
- 4,147
- 4,849
I'm sorry if I'm overstepping here (but it seems pretty important to point out) or if it's a dead topic now but I would like to point out how manipulative this is blaming Omega on how toxic he is and trying to make it out to seem like he is the problem while trying to evoke pity for himself by saying he rather be banned because of Omega's "toxicity" despite being the prime aggressor. This is pretty much gaslighting and narcissistic.
- 10,300
- 5,145
In your mind I'm an aggressor, but it's Omega who's being extremely toxic with his text that insulted me, I've never even dared to insult him like that, you're also not a good source to say something here, since you're often a bad person with others.
Dragon Ball Cosmology Canon
Speaking of Daizenshuu, I think it's worth mentioning that things that only appeared in anime are included in DB's Daizenshuus. Of course, but the exclusive anime things are in Daizenshuu 3 and 5 (and in the Daizenshuu 7 dictionary), but here you have Toriyama saying that the cosmology map was...
- 5,761
- 8,015
Please just stop and drop the subject, ok? If you and Omega can't get along with each other just don't speak to one another and if you still can't do that I suggest asking an admin to block each other from seeing the other's messages (an extreme measure to be sure but it's clear to me and various other users that for whatever reason there's beef and it's actually affecting DB revisions/discussions).
Personally it really shouldn't be that deep, harmless banter and facetious comments that unfortunately devolved into boundaries being crossed and now you're asking to be banned after just receiving your first official warning. Just take a small break bro, it's just online Vs debating not a court case. I've said my peace, apologies in advance if I contributed to any derailment here.
- 29,971
- 31,091
I agree and same with the other staff that nothing beyond a light warning is fine.
- 3,106
- 3,178
And here we are again. Unfortunately.
Reporting @Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara for being needlessly antagonistic and insulting as a result of this thread.
She makes a pretty shady comment about the reading comprehension and literacy of her opposition (and this does confirm it's about the above thread) and she actively goes on about how the entire verse in question is exaggerated, even after being told to calm down. She also feels the need to enter threads unrelated to the CRT to remind people that she would downgrade a verse,for whatever reason.
Furthermore, on the very first thread, she showed a consistently abrasive attitude when things weren't going her way.
Now, this would be one thing if it was a first offense.
Issue is, again, Fujiwara has a consistent history of showing this kind of behavior. As you probably remember, I already reported her once for...well, the same reasons : Spiting verse supporters, aggressiveness etc... And as I pointed out last time, this isn't even the first time she gets dragged to RVR. Long story short, she's already walking on thin ice and has been already banned not too long ago.
I honestly don't get the reasoning behind this kind of attitude. With that, i rest my case.
Reporting @Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara for being needlessly antagonistic and insulting as a result of this thread.
She makes a pretty shady comment about the reading comprehension and literacy of her opposition (and this does confirm it's about the above thread) and she actively goes on about how the entire verse in question is exaggerated, even after being told to calm down. She also feels the need to enter threads unrelated to the CRT to remind people that she would downgrade a verse,for whatever reason.
Furthermore, on the very first thread, she showed a consistently abrasive attitude when things weren't going her way.
Now, this would be one thing if it was a first offense.
Issue is, again, Fujiwara has a consistent history of showing this kind of behavior. As you probably remember, I already reported her once for...well, the same reasons : Spiting verse supporters, aggressiveness etc... And as I pointed out last time, this isn't even the first time she gets dragged to RVR. Long story short, she's already walking on thin ice and has been already banned not too long ago.
I honestly don't get the reasoning behind this kind of attitude. With that, i rest my case.
- 1,159
- 724
If I may interject and add something, she also has a history of expressly antagonistic remarks and comments in Dragon Ball threads, especially towards a few supporters, as well as general brashness towards anyone who talks about upgrading the verse which is best seen in the Dragon Ball Heroes thread by @Theglassman12 and its follow-up made by Fujiwara herself.
- 19,325
- 9,911
Just to add some insight regarding Ottavio's report, I've directly contacted Fuji in DMs regarding the "reading comprehension being nonexistent" comment and asked her to tone it down, and she refused to listen and just say that she does this a lot on the pet peeves thread and never got reported, so take that what you will.
- 29,971
- 31,091
Yeah, this is not okay, and she has a habit of keeping at it despite being told multiple times to stop or tone it down. And given the final warning from DarkGrath, I agree a short ban is in order. But the next question is how long? A month or two sounds good?
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,242
- 10,570
I cleared this up with Clover in the pet peeves thread. I said it was a general complaint I've had for many years, and the latest thread was one of many examples. That's it. I didn't call out anyone in particular (unless you want to say I insulted the entire wiki, I guess?), I was just airing a very broad grievance. Saying I'm going to downgrade a verse is also... not a rule violation? Like, I'll admit to it here, I would like to downgrade God of War because I think some things are wrong.
Bringing up Dragon Ball is also poisoning the well a bit here, since that issue has since been resolved with a 2 week ban.
- 2,265
- 2,229
I'm going to be honest here, I think you're blowing things out of proportion. Yes, her speech and language she uses can be very blunt or harsh, but this is on an entirely separate thread, which is basically used to vent frustrations. Her messages were not targeted towards anyone, and I feel as if you're just looking for excuses to get her another warn or ban when, in reality, she's still in line, just a bit heated.
Treating this as "walking on thin ice" as well is also kind of stupid because she's been on good behavior, so once again, I think you're just reaching for straws when pretty much everyone has their moments and gets frustrated a bit. Not like she was actively targeting people.
- 7,156
- 12,885
My feelings are the same as Curry's. She vented her frustrations on a thread meant for such a purpose, she did not direct it at anyone in particular, and what she said was not overboard in any case.
Also, despite what the report said, Fuji did not "confirm" that it was about the recent CRT. Oddly, that claim links to a comment which does precisely the opposite of that.
Also, despite what the report said, Fuji did not "confirm" that it was about the recent CRT. Oddly, that claim links to a comment which does precisely the opposite of that.
- 19,325
- 9,911
@DarkDragonMedeus if a ban needs to be issued, one or two months would be fine given her last ban was 2 weeks.
- 11,259
- 17,505
I won't get too involved with this, but going by what's been brought up, I think this is especially noteworthy - as this is tantamount to ignoring staff warnings (not the formal warnings, no) about her conduct.
- 7,156
- 12,885
If a DM conversation is to be used as evidence, then the content of the messages should be provided in their entirety. I don't see the aforementioned comment as being an issue, so if all she did was disagree on the matter, or pointed out that precedence suggests it's acceptable, then it would be quite a stretch to characterize it as ignoring a staff warning.
- 3,106
- 3,178
I'll leave the decision to staff. But I find that saying I'm doing this for the sake of a ban is very offensive towards myself.
I literally had a discussion with a staff member recently, where I was asked to not make assumptions out of nowhere.
Show some professionalism, at least. Thanks.
I literally had a discussion with a staff member recently, where I was asked to not make assumptions out of nowhere.
Show some professionalism, at least. Thanks.
- 29,971
- 31,091
I didn't realize it was the pet peeve thread, but at the same time, even that has a rule against "Going overboard". Based on how Ottavio's report was organized, it gave the impression she said those words on the God of War thread; which would have been a much bigger deal if that was the case. But she has behaved better mostly since her 2 week ban and also mentioned wanting to wait before attempting to downgrade anything Dragon Ball related out of respect for Akira Toriyama.
But anyway, I suppose I might have overreacted and now more neutral but leaning towards letting her have a chance. It really depends on the interpretation of "Overboard" is the main thing.
But anyway, I suppose I might have overreacted and now more neutral but leaning towards letting her have a chance. It really depends on the interpretation of "Overboard" is the main thing.
- 11,259
- 17,505
Yes, this was brought up directly because of the recent CRT. Like, objectively speaking.
- 19,325
- 9,911
- 15,345
- 11,145
I don't think a ban is needed but in no way do I think that comment was okay regardless of if it was on the pet peevs thread, especially as a person who has reading issues. That comment didn't need to be directed at a person when we know it's caused by a thread or threads which consists of individuals. Once again, that's my opinion but I definitely don't think a ban is needed.
- 7,156
- 12,885
I'm fine with simply affirming a broader collective staff judgment that such comments, even if unspecific, are too inflammatory for the forum. I don't think any action further than that would be justified given the inconsistent messaging on these sorts of things.
- 3,205
- 7,861
Would be more appreciative if you had a stake in the conversation.
- 7,156
- 12,885
I'm going to be deleting the recent non staff comments. If we allow everyone with an opinion on a report to comment this thread would be a mess (or an even bigger mess, rather). Please only comment if you're directly involved in a report or are making one.
- 3,205
- 7,861
Seems like this case isn’t going anywhere. 3 staff members opposed to a ban; let’s just so straight to the conclusion unless Glassman still has further stuff to say.
Last edited:
- 19,325
- 9,911
@GarrixianXD aside from what I've said and posted, I don't really have anything else left to say on the matter, so better to get some more staff input on the situation.
- 11,259
- 17,505
I think some level of action should be taken. If not a ban, definitely a warning.
Edit: Though if she has 9 warnings as Glass mentioned, things get a little different imo
Edit: Though if she has 9 warnings as Glass mentioned, things get a little different imo
- 15,345
- 11,145
A warning is fine we me.
- 3,205
- 7,861
Mhmm.
- 17,757
- 17,201
Yeah, I second this. I'm alright with whatever action is decided to be taken by the collective staff but having 9 warnings, many of which are presumably of similar instances, should be taken into account.
- 19,325
- 9,911
I'm fine with either a ban or a warning, though the 9 previous reports Fuji has should be some sign that this can't be tolerated any longer, especially if she acts up again which just shows she's not learned anything from her 2 week ban.
- 165,108
- 72,013
- Thread starter
- #26,434
I agree with Medeus.
@LuffyRuffy46307 @omegabronic
Is it acceptable if I prevent both of you from seeing each other's posts in this forum?
- 165,108
- 72,013
- Thread starter
- #26,435
Yes, a warning seems to be all that is necessary here.
- 2,074
- 1,749
i do think 4 prior warnings on the tracker + more informal ones that aren't on there + being right off the heels of a previous 2 week ban for a similar reason should be taken into consideration, yeah
- 10,300
- 5,145
Yes, you can do that.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 21,528
- 18,859
Regarding the Fujiwara situation (since I missed it when it was initially brought up): I am largely in agreement with Curry, although Fujiwara does need to cease the use of various other threads to slander others she doesn't like. It is and has been a problem for some time.
- 165,108
- 72,013
- Thread starter
- #26,439
Okay. I have handled it.
- 11,259
- 17,505
Personally I'm not a fan of Curry's response, especially the accusations that Ottavio is trying to get Fuji warned/banned. The fact of the matter is that this has been a repeated problem, as has been pointed out, and it's very reductive to paint this as such.
Similar threads
