Hey hey, sorry to bother you if you are still consuming rocks
but I need desperate help on
this thread!
It talks about finding the speed/timeframe needed to blitz our visual systems. So this is essentially a type of faster-than-eye figure.
The value of 34.3 m/s we often choose for any and all types of FTE blitzing is flawed for perception blitzing as it represents human reaction speed/time rather than perception speed itself. The eye can perceive subsonic speeds, but it may result in motion blur, which is often still enough visual info to tell that you something is there
and moving. To accurately account for speeds faster than visual perception itself, we need to consider the time frame in which neurons collect visual information from the eye. Based on extensive research using "flickering lights" (Youll see this a lot in the thread), the widely accepted minimum speed required to surpass perception is in the range of 1/50s to 1/90s at any distance, as long as the moving object is clearly visible before its movement. This aligns with MIT research stating a visual perception speed of 13 milliseconds.
The thread is a hassle to keep alive, only Don'tTalk and Flashinglight responded with very few posts and just stopped all of a sudden. Please help me. You and Wokistan are my last hope
