• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

DEATH BATTLE! Discussion Thread (All-time Death Battle Spoilers Alert)

What are weekly's wincons
Literally everything.
Higher AP/ Dura - Been involved in more threads
More Experience - See Above Point
Higher Speed - Weeklys ability to response quickly and concisely shit stomps Sean
Hax/Abilities - Not Applicable. Neither are mods or paying members

@Chariot190 Victims, bust Weekly shitstomps Sean. Jinx is there but is irrelevant
 
There mindset boils down to him in SDT not lasting enough to win than overall stamina battle than just base form
It also requires the baseless stamina headcanon to stand. A headcanon based on assumptions and contradicted by the fact Nero and Vergil regenerated from nothing without any stamina, the fact Dante disempowered Abigail (who regenerates from a puddle) while Abigail still had loads of stamina afterwards, the fact Argosax was killed instantly while still having lots of stamina, and so many more obvious feats that show us that it's power null rather than stamina.

It also ignored the obvious resistance to time stop and King Cerberus being absolute zero (an instant kill seems relevant when they claimed it was a war of attrition).
 
watching this db:
tenor.gif
 
Literally everything.
Higher AP/ Dura - Been involved in more threads
More Experience - See Above Point
Higher Speed - Weeklys ability to response quickly and concisely shit stomps Sean
Hax/Abilities - Not Applicable. Neither are mods or paying members

@Chariot190 Victims, bust Weekly shitstomps Sean. Jinx is there but is irrelevant
Insane mismatch what was the crew thinking
 
I want to see Exodia in the next one. Whether it obliterates or gets obliterated is irrelevant.
 
Vergil regenerated from nothing without any stamina
This took him years and was only able to restore himself proper after taking Yamato from Nero.

the fact Dante disempowered Abigail (who regenerates from a puddle) while Abigail still had loads of stamina afterwards,
Simply not being tired doesn't mean one isn't drawing upon a finite resource to recuperate.

so many more obvious feats that show us that it's power null rather than stamina.
This sounds so bizarre, because then we have to say that Urizen nulled Dante's regen but not enough that Dante couldn't recover but just enough that a strong punch would knock him out for an entire month.
 
This took him years and was only able to restore himself proper after taking Yamato from Nero.


Simply not being tired doesn't mean one isn't drawing upon a finite resource to recuperate.


This sounds so bizarre, because then we have to say that Urizen nulled Dante's regen but not enough that Dante couldn't recover but just enough that a strong punch would knock him out for an entire month.
You seem reputable, who are you betting for the next MU, Sean vs Weekly? I've heard it's a stomp.
 
This took him years and was only able to restore himself proper after taking Yamato from Nero.
He rebuilt himself from non-existence while having zero stamina. Years or not. Nero did something similar.
Simply not being tired doesn't mean one isn't drawing upon a finite resource to recuperate.
So is it stamina or not? This is the problem with this entire headcanon. You're asking me to prove a negative when this headcanon applies a weakness for being knocked out despite regeneration only to one verse, despite the fact we've seen lots of characters get beaten up despite having regeneration. Burden of proof is on DB to prove regeneration stops working with less stamina, not on others to prove it doesn't.
This sounds so bizarre, because then we have to say that Urizen nulled Dante's regen but not enough that Dante couldn't recover but just enough that a strong punch would knock him out for an entire month.
Nulling or slowing regeneration with power doesn't mean they won't recover much later.

Besides, even if we dismiss the power null showings, the burden of proof is still on the proponents of that headcanon to prove regeneration gets weaker with less stamina because they can be beaten down, but no such weakness is needed for all the times Wolverine and characters like him can get messed up despite theirs.
 
He rebuilt himself from non-existence while having zero stamina. Years or not.
He was heavily weakened and was still crumbling away up until he took Yamato from Nero. It also wasn't complete "non-existence", it was at most him lacking his body.

Nero did something similar.
Nero's body had melted into the Savior yes that much is true, but he required the use of Yamato to separate himself from the Savior. This still doesn't fight the notion that their energy pool is finite.

Nulling or slowing regeneration with power doesn't mean they won't recover much later.
"Nulling or slowing regeneration with power" just sounds like a funny way of saying fighting someone stronger depletes his energy faster, it doesn't refute the stamina argument.

but no such weakness is needed for all the times Wolverine and characters like him can get messed up despite theirs.
Because Devil May Cry is not Marvel, does Wolverine draw upon demonic energy to recover? No? Then why is he being used as an argument?
 
He was heavily weakened and was still crumbling away up until he took Yamato from Nero. It also wasn't complete "non-existence", it was at most him lacking his body.
No trace remained of him as directly stated, and his name no longer existed.
Nero's body had melted into the Savior yes that much is true, but he required the use of Yamato to separate himself from the Savior. This still doesn't fight the notion that their energy pool is finite.
Energy pool being finite is one thing. Proof their regeneration stops working?
"Nulling or slowing regeneration with power" just sounds like a funny way of saying fighting someone stronger depletes his energy faster, it doesn't refute the stamina argument.
Actually, it doesn't show that way. First of all slower regeneration isn't shown really, and in cases where attacks down characters who earlier regenerated from heavier wounds they have plenty of stamina (the monkey, Abigail).
 
No trace remained of him as directly stated
He wasn't there presently after he disappeared, no.

Energy pool being finite is one thing. Proof their regeneration stops working?
One exists as fuel for the other, if one runs out so does the other - it is actually that simple.

First of all slower regeneration isn't shown really, and in cases where attacks down characters who earlier regenerated from heavier wounds they have plenty of stamina (the monkey, Abigail).
If they still had demonic energy then they could still regenerate, yes. If Dante can regenerate from bullets to the head and from a puddle then being knocked out from a single punch would not be of concern - unless stronger attacks are more taxing on it.
 
One exists as fuel for the other, if one runs out so does the other - it is actually that simple.
We need evidence that this is the case instead of demanding proof it isn't. Ironically feats do contradict it, but that's not even needed. The burden of proof is on the headcanon claiming a unique weakness to only this regeneration based on stuff that happens to almost every regenerating character.

Vergil had no demonic energy or even an existence, how did he regenerate? I don't care how long it took or that he was still struggling, he regenerated his whole body and even his name (which is stated to be the abstract concept of his being in-verse) while starting with zero stamina or energy. No trace detected by someone who can sense energy and smell demons. Abigail still had lots of stamina after being disempowered and wasn't even injured. How is that possible via just a physical strike weakening his stamina?
If Dante can regenerate from bullets to the head and from a puddle then being knocked out from a single punch would not be of concern
This happens with lots of characters who can regenerate. All the time. Even Majin Buu of all people had this happen. It's absurdly common. This headcanon attempts to impose a weakness only on one verse, a weakness that basically renders the regeneration worthless no less, based on very specific interpretations of very little evidence.
 
Last edited:
Majin Buu doesn't have energy needs like that though..
Characters who have the regeneration to shrug off far greater wounds frequently get knocked out by attacks from stronger characters with far lesser damage shown. It's very common, so it's unfair to impose a weakness on only one verse for it.
 
We need evidence that this is the case instead of demanding proof it isn't.
Urizen knocking Dante out cold for a month is a very clear example of this.

Vergil had no demonic energy or even an existence, how did he regenerate?
The direct quote from the guidebook is "his body disappeared without a trace", not whatever else you're adding onto it.

This happens with lots of characters who can regenerate. All the time.
I don't care about other characters, they aren't relevant to this discussion and including them is only a means to handwave a contradiction to your narrative.
 
Urizen knocking Dante out cold for a month is a very clear example of this.
By this logic any regenerating character being knocked out is proof of the same thing. Exhaustion and regeneration not working are two different things.
The direct quote from the guidebook is "his body disappeared without a trace", not whatever else you're adding onto it.
The quote I read back then was about no trace remaining in the room.

It doesn't matter though. If Dante blasting Nelo Angelo into nothing didn't deplete that stamina enough to stop him coming back, how exactly does Clive burning Dante do so? Even if we did accept the stamina argument, we'd still be left with someone coming back after being blasted to nothing and having no stamina, never mind the part about the name. So even then Clive couldn't kill Dante.
I don't care about other characters, they aren't relevant to this discussion and including them is only a means to handwave a contradiction to your narrative.
Not when you're attempting to impose a different rule on DMC compared to other verses and characters. Especially over a trope as common as regenerating characters being downed by wounds lesser than their regeneration should handle.
 
Last edited:
This has turned less about the fact they thought Dante had a time limit (however vague they believed it is by the time of 5 in the black box they believed to be) and more about how his stamina/energy into his regen shouldn't be taken to such an easy extent as they thought it would be
 
By this logic any regenerating character being knocked out is proof of the same thing.
Again - no, unless said characters regenerate through the use of a finite energy source then it is not proof of the same thing.

The quote I read back then was about no trace remaining in the room.


"With darkness spewing from his body, the jet-black knight was approaching his final hour. The glow of life in his voice finally burned out completely, and his body disappeared without a trace."
It doesn't matter though. If Dante blasting Nelo Angelo into nothing didn't deplete that stamina enough to stop him coming back, how exactly does Clive burning Dante do so?
It evidently did prevent him regenerating for a time, and it was bad enough that he had to rip Nero's arm from him to retrieve Yamato to keep himself going after recovering for that many years.

Even if we did accept the stamina argument, we'd still be left with someone coming back after being blasted to nothing and having no stamina. So even then Clive couldn't kill Dante.
He killed him for the time being which is all that really matters for the Death Battle, he will be gone for a considerable period of time similar to how Discord will eventually return after Bill killed him - it does not prevent him from being the victor.

Not when you're attempting to impose a different rule on DMC compared to other verses and characters.
It's not imposing a different rule it's just abiding by what the source material presents.
 
Dante vs Clive was really cool, objectively. Like a 10/10.

But I don't know either character, so I didn't enjoy it as much.

Also, did everyone notice Death Battle episode animations are getting longer and longer? It seems that not being restricted to, like, 2–4 minutes really helped them a lot. Fights feel more natural and stuff. Honestly, the quality of the animations has improved a lot ever since they got independent.
 
Again - no, unless said characters regenerate through the use of a finite energy source then it is not proof of the same thing.
Except this isn't proven at all. In fact no evidence points to this. This might be surprising, but demons have a strange physiology in addition to demonic energy. Considering that physiology is usually the source of regeneration, and characters like V and Arius had lots of demonic energy in a human body and notably lacked regeneration, this tells us that the regeneration is not just powered by their demonic energy.

We have characters who regenerate from nothingness with zero stamina, characters with lots of demon energy but human bodies and souls who lack regeneration entirely (notably V and his demons all draw from V's own energy, all of the demons have regeneration, and yet V lacks it), and demons having some pretty freaky physiologies ranging from demons whose body parts can act independently from their body to demons who are literally non-existent. Demons are also shown to adapt to things as they interact with them; notably Dante went from damaged by Ifrit's fire to immune to it while he was still engulfed in it, same with the negative effects of the demon world. This is all demonic physiology.

So the evidence does not support the notion that the regeneration only works through demonic energy, leaving us with just the issue of characters getting hurt by less visible damage than they should handle. Even ignoring the fact that the evidence actually indicates regeneration null rather than weak regeneration, imposing a weakness for this, especially one that seems tailor made to basically render the regeneration worthless garbage, only on this verse when this trope is almost as common as regeneration itself, just seems like targeted downplay.
It evidently did prevent him regenerating for a time, and it was bad enough that he had to rip Nero's arm from him to retrieve Yamato to keep himself going after recovering for that many years.
One doesn't typically rot away rapidly just because they can't regenerate; there has to be more. Dante does have deconstruction for example, and he's the one who killed Vergil. Dante also had his energy drained to the point of incapacitation at one point, and he didn't start rotting.

Also keep in mind Vergil had to regenerate his name as well, the concept that governs him.
 
Last edited:
Dante vs Clive was really cool, objectively. Like a 10/10.

But I don't know either character, so I didn't enjoy it as much.

Also, did everyone notice Death Battle episode animations are getting longer and longer? It seems that not being restricted to, like, 2–4 minutes really helped them a lot. Fights feel more natural and stuff. Honestly, the quality of the animations has improved a lot ever since they got independent.
This episode was painfully, frustratingly close to a 10/10. Some slightly better character interactions, a better death with better tension, then you could look past the research and verdict to give it a 10/10

It's so good it's criminal it's not better
 
so-from-what-im-get-from-db-analysis-is-that-the-loser-lost-v0-7wy1uwonab0g1.jpeg

The actual game seemingly saying "he can't stay in this form for long" seems to have ****** Dante over.
This, and the use of Netflix DMC as footage did come off as a touch... anti-featy, if you know what I mean?

Doesn't bother me, but I CAN understand why it concerns others.
 
Back
Top