Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

[Zyurtunder13]

He is not only causing this mess in JJK thread but also in other threads despite no one is even talking about JJK there.

My Hero Academia General Discussion Thread #18

https://vsbattles.com/threads/drago-vs-danjuro-tobita.170318/

vsbattles.com

I just responded to you, I did nothing against you after that in that thread, so it seems like a poor argument, I could just stop talking about JJK all together if y'all want that.
@Mr. Bambu Because an entire year ban seems excessive, considering that y'all never tried to ban actual bad things like transphobia or racism for more than a month

 

[EldemadeDityjon]

I don't want to derail RVT so I'm not gonna go back and forth with you. I'll leave the decision to staff.

That is not the your only time either.

https://vsbattles.com/threads/my-he...ussion-thread-18.107553/page-913#post-6670181

It's @Zyurtunder13 again

^

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Then @EldemadeDityjon should receive some kind of punishment too, considering that he was the one who actually started the beef and slander, not me

It is my estimation that most if not all of your posts on this forum have been geared towards some kind of slander. It is my belief that you are a child, maybe too young to use the forum, maybe not, that nevertheless have acted childish about entering discussion threads to bash other verses entirely unrelated to that discussion thread.

You went to the My Hero Academia thread to talk about how 'sus' you find One Piece ratings, your very first post was a half-hearted "I disagree" against a JJK CRT (which we now establish that you do have a very real grudge against), and you enter months-concluded vs threads to imply malintent and, quoting you, "shamelessness", on its OP. Your posts in the RVRT have been purely inflammatory, and your continued harassment of JJK threads has been downright unacceptable. You achieved all of this in less than 100 total messages on our forum.

I've gone through Eldemade's messages in the JJK thread up to the point when you entered. Wouldn't you know it, you actually shot first, posting this shit.

I want to believe that every user can be given some semblance of common sense, and at the very least not go to someone's doorstep to trash talk them. Maybe a ban will do that for you, it's hard to say. But everything you have contributed so far has been toxic, instigative bullshit.

I'm waiting for another staff to comment on the duration of the ban.

 

[Zyurtunder13]

I don't want to derail RVT so I'm not gonna go back and forth with you. I'll leave the decision to staff.

That is not the your only time either.

^

Yes, I said something bad about JJK here, so what, y'all were saying bad things about Demon Slayer in your thread too, so y'all should get punish too I guess?

 

[Damage3245]

I'm waiting for another staff to comment on the duration of the ban.

A year seems best to me.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Yes, I said something bad about JJK here, so what, y'all were saying bad things about Demon Slayer in your thread too, so y'all should get punish too I guess?

There is a difference between saying "this series sucks" in a thread unrelated to the thing, and going into the thread relating to the thing and shouting "this series sucks" over and over again while trying to start fights.

 

[Sir_sun_man]

There is a difference between saying "this series sucks" in a thread unrelated to the thing, and going into the thread relating to the thing and shouting "this series sucks" over and over again while trying to start fights.

The other part also being that the discussion around Demon slayer's plot and its issues was an actual discussion in the JJK thread (which I am part of) and not just "oh this sucks" off rip.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

I've put through a one year ban on both his forum account and wiki account. I will add this to the Warning Tracker for posterity. See ya next time folks.

 

[Antvasima]

I still think that this member is evidently only here to cause harm and should be banned permanently, but we can change it back to one year if other staff members disagree.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Are you saying that you swapped it to permanent? I would rather hear from others before going around changing bans like that.

 

[Antvasima]

Well, if others disagree, I am fine with if we change it back, but I think you are correct. I messed up a bit here. My apologies.

 

[Damage3245]

Keep it as one year. One year is enough time to check if they have matured.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. I will change it back then.

Edit: I have done so now.

 

[The_King_of_Prudence]

This should probably be deleted or renamed.

 

[Antvasima]

I handled it.

Pages that link to "Cultivation Realms (Dragon Talisman)" | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[GarrixianXD]

Try again for Low 1-A / 1-A Honkai.

I also disagree because if you look again BDE 1. BDE 1 already Transcerds dimensions because it is aspatial =transcerd space and atemporal =transcerd time , the word transcerd does not mean superiority it just means to go beyond which is not superiority. What type page you reading? You might...

vsbattles.com

I’ll appreciate if someone can delete the derailing and unwanted comments on this thread.

 

[CloverDragon03]

Reporting @BlackDarkness679 for their behavior in this thread.

• Hostility starts here
• Doubling down after being told by an admin to stop, and baselessly claiming staff are biased
• Continues here
• Doubles down again
• Two more times

This is behavior he's been reported and banned for more than once now, and it looks to me like he hasn't learned from that at all

 

[Antvasima]

Try again for Low 1-A / 1-A Honkai.

I also disagree because if you look again BDE 1. BDE 1 already Transcerds dimensions because it is aspatial =transcerd space and atemporal =transcerd time , the word transcerd does not mean superiority it just means to go beyond which is not superiority. What type page you reading? You might...

vsbattles.com

I’ll appreciate if someone can delete the derailing and unwanted comments on this thread.

Bambu handled it.

 

[Antvasima]

Reporting @BlackDarkness679 for their behavior in this thread.

• Hostility starts here
• Doubling down after being told by an admin to stop, and baselessly claiming staff are biased
• Continues here
• Doubles down again
• Two more times

This is behavior he's been reported and banned for more than once now, and it looks to me like he hasn't learned from that at all

I do not think that they seem to have done anything punishable. They seem to mean well, but to become too easily frustrated and agitated.

I have posted an instruction message to them.

https://vsbattles.com/threads/tekken-crt-some-issues-in-kazuyas-scaling.170769/post-6675100

 

[Theglassman12]

This is not the first time BlackDarkness behaves like this whenever there’s any opposition. He did the same thing in the previous Tekken thread where he basically acts like I’m some villain for questioning an ability he tries to push for Kazuya. Something Planck warned him about in the same thread.

 

[Antvasima]

BlackDarkness isn't remotely malicious though. He just has a bad temper, and is otherwise a productive contributing member.

 

[CloverDragon03]

He's been banned twice for the exact same behavior and has yet to shape up despite that, so I have my doubts

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Over a year ago, being fair. I'll try to look through the situation later if nobody else had, about to be busy.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for helping out.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Blackdarkness has no warnings on the tracker. Their last ban was before the tracker went up, so as far as intel suggests, they have been on reasonably good behavior since. I invite people to offer instances of warnings since the end of their last ban to prove that wrong, of course, but failing that I'd say that a year of relatively good behavior (acknowledging Glass' post above) for a regularly active user is a pretty good argument to suggest this is an outlier.

Onto the meat of the matter, the report itself: I find it reportable, it is deserving of at least a warning. The first comment is a soft-handed way of calling someone stupid and they continued to act unfairly. I would not consider the activity egregious for this website, and indeed under the conditions of this site some amount of leniency is to be expected, one imagines, when dealing with someone arguing with the staff. It is an unpleasant situation to be in, to find oneself debating with a figure of authority where you do not have any authority- and thus for a minor incident like this, against the staff, I am inclined to invite even more charity than usual.

Still. I agree at least a warning should be given to not do that again. Aggression serves no ends, not even his.

 

[CloverDragon03]

I'm content with a warning yeah. It's not like infractions such as this immediately result in a ban even when coming back from an existing ban.

 

[Antvasima]

I do not think anything more than a polite warning should be necessary here.

 

[MasqueTLDF]

Hello, I'd like two make a report of two users (@BlackeJan and @Digital_Franz) who were being disruptive and rude towards myself and others in this thread. (As well as in a past thread.) For the former, these are the instances that I'm referring to, these are for the latter. Feel free to read the context to the comments in the threads. Also, I thought that I'd mention that @BlackeJan has made a false report on me in the past. Now, I don't want either of them to get in any serious trouble, just something like a warning and some way to prevent communication from either of them to me and vice-versa. Though, I'll trust the judgement of any staff decisions in this matter. And please tell me if I was wrong at any point, I'd like to improve my social skills. Thank you.
Edit: If a staff member could moderate the thread as well, I'd be appreciative.

 

[Baabasaplar95]

As I mentioned here, user Mayonnaise_king has added a hax to Black Hat's profile that is not on written in his CRT. We talked about it more clearly in q/a, the link of which I left, you can look at it together with the other user. It's definitely fake hax

 

[KingNanaya]

As I mentioned here, user Mayonnaise_king has added a hax to Black Hat's profile that is not on written in his CRT. We talked about it more clearly in q/a, the link of which I left, you can look at it together with the other user. It's definitely fake hax

This post belongs here

Wiki Vandalism Reports

He's also vandalised other profiles. I left him a warning message. Thank you 🙏

vsbattles.com

 

[BlackeJan]

Hello, I'd like two make a report of two users (@BlackeJan and @Digital_Franz) who were being disruptive and rude towards myself and others in this thread. (As well as in a past thread.) For the former, these are the instances that I'm referring to, these are for the latter. Feel free to read the context to the comments in the threads. Also, I thought that I'd mention that @BlackeJan has made a false report on me in the past. Now, I don't want either of them to get in any serious trouble, just something like a warning and some way to prevent communication from either of them to me and vice-versa. Though, I'll trust the judgement of any staff decisions in this matter. And please tell me if I was wrong at any point, I'd like to improve my social skills. Thank you.
Edit: If a staff member could moderate the thread as well, I'd be appreciative.

I don’t have the energy nor time to be dealing with this. I didn’t even make a false report last time and only asked for a warning so the mere fact u are trying to deceive people here is astounding and disheartening. U even defended someone who was obviously being a bit rude to me and said nothing to that staff. As I said before, masking your kindness with rudeness seems to be your specialty

 

[MasqueTLDF]

I don’t have the energy nor time to be dealing with this. I didn’t even make a false report last time and only asked for a warning so the mere fact u are trying to deceive people here is astounding and disheartening. U even defended someone who was obviously being a bit rude to me and said nothing to that staff. As I said before, masking your kindness with rudeness seems to be your specialty

I'm not deceiving anyone, I'm just sharing what I believe is the truth.

 

[BlackeJan]

I'm not deceiving anyone, I'm just sharing what I believe is the truth.

And your belief is horribly wrong. I misjudge u. I thought u was an actual good person but as I said before, masking rudeness with politeness. I can sit here then and believe how all u wanna do is only defend people who believe in your thoughts and those that don’t believe in what u think are wrong. U even asked another staff to come and give his though who isn’t even interest in it, gave his 2 cents (which was more of him disagreeing with what u wanted in the OP) then still thought those that disagreed with your stance didn’t bring “good debate”

 

[MasqueTLDF]

And your belief is horribly wrong. I misjudge u. I thought u was an actual good person but as I said before, masking rudeness with politeness. I can sit here then and believe how all u wanna do is only defend people who believe in your thoughts and those that don’t believe in what u think are wrong.

Not really gonna respond to this any further as it's just a repeat of what you said before.

U even asked another staff to come and give his though who isn’t even interest in it, gave his 2 cents (which was more of him disagreeing with what u wanted in the OP) then still thought those that disagreed with your stance didn’t bring “good debate”

When did this happen?

 

[Digital_Franz]

The discussion has already started without any staff present? Chill out and be patient.

 

[Antvasima]

@DarkDragonMedeus @Mr. Bambu @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @Agnaa @Just_a_Random_Butler @DarkGrath @Dereck03 @Planck69 @JustSomeWeirdo @Theglassman12 @Eficiente @DemonGodMitchAubin @Duedate8898 @Armorchompy @CrimsonStarFallen @LordTracer @Emirp sumitpo @EliminatorVenom @LephyrTheRevanchist @Deagonx @FinePoint @Elizio33 @Propellus @AbaddonTheDisappointment @Catzlaflame @ActuallySpaceMan42

We need your continuous help here.

 

[Digital_Franz]

Okay I guess I can start. What should I even do? Defend myself? I don't think I did anything wrong.

First of all Masque points to posts from the old thread and the new one. On I said he's acting like a "know it all" because Gabbling Dragon took an example, as a member who knows the verse I said the example doesn't fit the situation and it wasn't Gabbling Dragon who argued but Masque himself yet in one of our discussions in the thread he told me this:

Sorry, I haven't read the series, I can't comment on your example but maybe we can agree to disagree? Hope I haven't come off as rude throughout the discussion. Anyway, I'm not even exactly sure what the goal of the argument is anyway.

He can't comment on my example but wants to argue in the CRT on the same example even though it was the WN version.
Furthermore, Masque has already displayed rude behavior, especially towards Vietthai96 which earned him to be reported here. He displays passive rude attitudes towards anyone who disagrees with his point of view, telling them that they lack common sense and such. Why haven't I reported him since? Because I don't give a sh*t.

I tell him that he chose the wrong examples and he directly says that I am rude. Why? Because I said that he chose the wrong examples? The farce. Almost everything he pointed out for the new thread is not rude. And furthermore saying that it is a farce is my point of view that I can display. If it were not the case, the concept of wankers would not have existed in the first place. Literally all Masque spends his time doing in the CRT is: it is said this, this is the most logical conclusion. Are we here to work without a statement and believe things? Curry and him say: yeah increasing and multiplying are the same thing. With this logic I take Naruto, the chakra being a UES, I just see the gap between his 8-A key for part I and his 5-C key for part II, I make the ratio and I place him at MFTL+ because "speed and strength increase proportionally".

When I give him a metaphor like "can you hear yourself talking", he wants to play on words and say that he doesn't speak but he writes. Of course that's the case. But if he wants to play this game, he should do it alone. Basically I ask him for direct statements but he gives me roundabout statements. Isn't that a joke? In any case, I don't want to waste time on this childishness.

 

[MasqueTLDF]

Okay I guess I can start. What should I even do? Defend myself? I don't think I did anything wrong.

First of all Masque points to posts from the old thread and the new one. On I said he's acting like a "know it all" because Gabbling Dragon took an example, as a member who knows the verse I said the example doesn't fit the situation and it wasn't Gabbling Dragon who argued but Masque himself yet in one of our discussions in the thread he told me this:


He can't comment on my example but wants to argue in the CRT on the same example even though it was the WN version.

I don't understand how this is relevant.

Furthermore, Masque has already displayed rude behavior, especially towards Vietthai96 which earned him to be reported here. He displays passive rude attitudes towards anyone who disagrees with his point of view, telling them that they lack common sense and such. Why haven't I reported him since? Because I don't give a sh*t.

I don't believe I've been rude to Vietthai and I've never claimed that anyone lacks common sense. And I encourage constructive criticism and have remained kind to multiple people who have disagreed with me.

I tell him that he chose the wrong examples and he directly says that I am rude. Why? Because I said that he chose the wrong examples? The farce. Almost everything he pointed out for the new thread is not rude.

I claimed that you were rude because I interpreted your comments as being disrespectful and they made me uncomfortable, there's no other reason.

And furthermore saying that it is a farce is my point of view that I can display. If it were not the case, the concept of wankers would not have existed in the first place. Literally all Masque spends his time doing in the CRT is: it is said this, this is the most logical conclusion. Are we here to work without a statement and believe things? Curry and him say: yeah increasing and multiplying are the same thing. With this logic I take Naruto, the chakra being a UES, I just see the gap between his 8-A key for part I and his 5-C key for part II, I make the ratio and I place him at MFTL+ because "speed and strength increase proportionally".

I don't believe this is relevant to the topic of the report.

When I give him a metaphor like "can you hear yourself talking", he wants to play on words and say that he doesn't speak but he writes. Of course that's the case. But if he wants to play this game, he should do it alone. Basically I ask him for direct statements but he gives me roundabout statements. Isn't that a joke? In any case, I don't want to waste time on this childishness.

I don't "play on words", I just wanted to give you a serious answer. And please don't call me childish, I try hard to always behave in a mature and respectful manner.

 

[Digital_Franz]

I don't understand how this is relevant.

You brought up the subject of the old CRT and you say you don't understand how it is relevant?

I don't believe I've been rude to Vietthai and I've never claimed that anyone lacks common sense. And I encourage constructive criticism and have remained kind to multiple people who have disagreed with me.

Hmm. Maybe it's only the case for Phoenks and me? Well, that doesn't matter to me

I claimed that you were rude because I interpreted your comments as being disrespectful and they made me uncomfortable, there's no other reason.

Because you interpret. Let's ask the staff to interpret the same comment.

I don't believe this is relevant to the topic of the report.

Just to show your behavior. It all comes down to logic for you which logically leads to criticism of things you take badly.

I don't "play on words", I just wanted to give you a serious answer. And please don't call me childish, I try hard to always behave in a mature and respectful manner.

And do you think I take the debate as a joke? You should have just answered me that that's not what you meant instead of adding a bunch of useless things.

 

[Digital_Franz]

I don't "play on words", I just wanted to give you a serious answer. And please don't call me childish, I try hard to always behave in a mature and respectful manner.

This all appears just like that. You're just making yourself out to be the victim when you're not. As BlackeJan said here, you reported him without mentioning Curry's rude attitude and making him out to be the bad guy.