• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.


so photons can split and bend this new research , so what the new reason for no light speed upgrade ?
 


so photons can split and bend this new research , so what the new reason for no light speed upgrade ?
Bruh , read the article with attention
 
naruto rasingen Geno's spiral canon every attack that look way stronger when it first used also garuo attacks
That doesn’t mean Ki control. You do realize there’s a difference between Ki control, an actual in-verse technique, and attack potency/destructive capacity, right?

Also you said every anime, but could only name two, L
 


so photons can split and bend this new research , so what the new reason for no light speed upgrade ?
The article is interesting but it doesn't even contain the word bend.
 
People treat Ki Control as this convenient excuse for all possible scenarios, but also ignores cases such as where characters were worried that Goku was going to blow up the Earth by firing a Kamehameha downwards, or when Goku warned Cell not to fire off a Kamehameha while at full power because it would destroy the planet unless he fired it into the sky.
That's true. Dragon Ball is kind of weird about that. Broly in an uncontrollable rage nuking a bunch of the arctic with Universe level ki blasts? Oh yeah, ki control! Goku fires a Kamehameha downward? Don't do it, you'll blow up the Earth!

But, it's to be expected from the guy who forgot Launch existed and thought Super Saiyan 3 was Super Saiyan 2.
 
The article is interesting but it doesn't even contain the word bend.
not in this one but google it there's a lot of videos in YouTube with lesser bend experiment also your wiki laws are so old people discover new things Avery day you should check it from time to time , there are no reason to not except light speed feats
 
That's a huge misconception. Light only appears to bend and pulse under very specific circumstances. You can't just fire a laser and bend it in mid-air without any sort of assistance because 'that's how light works'. It absolutely doesn't work that way.
 
That's a huge misconception. Light only appears to bend and pulse under very specific circumstances. You can't just fire a laser and bend it in mid-air without any sort of assistance because 'that's how light works'.
yeah g4 was a high tech robot remember ? , and also what is important is light can bend not how he can bend
 
G4 is not firing lasers through specific circumstances, he's just firing lasers that move externally to himself.

Again, light only appears to bend to a certain extent. It doesn't actually bend in the manner G4 bends it, neither physically nor visually.

It's very disingenuous to say that because light can bend (even though it actually can't), G4 must just be randomly bending light.
 
That's a huge misconception. Light only appears to bend and pulse under very specific circumstances. You can't just fire a laser and bend it in mid-air without any sort of assistance because 'that's how light works'. It absolutely doesn't work that way.

G4 is not firing lasers through specific circumstances, he's just firing lasers that move externally to himself.

Again, light only appears to bend to a certain extent. It doesn't actually bend in the manner G4 bends it, neither physically nor visually.

It's very disingenuous to say that because light can bend (even though it actually can't), G4 must just be randomly bending light.
you act like
G4 is not firing lasers through specific circumstances, he's just firing lasers that move externally to himself.

Again, light only appears to bend to a certain extent. It doesn't actually bend in the manner G4 bends it, neither physically nor visually.

It's very disingenuous to say that because light can bend (even though it actually can't), G4 must just be randomly bending light.
G4 is not firing lasers through specific circumstances, he's just firing lasers that move externally to himself.

Again, light only appears to bend to a certain extent. It doesn't actually bend in the manner G4 bends it, neither physically nor visually.

It's very disingenuous to say that because light can bend (even though it actually can't), G4 must just be randomly bending light.
you act like you light can bend in extreme
G4 is not firing lasers through specific circumstances, he's just firing lasers that move externally to himself.

Again, light only appears to bend to a certain extent. It doesn't actually bend in the manner G4 bends it, neither physically nor visually.

It's very disingenuous to say that because light can bend (even though it actually can't), G4 must just be randomly bending light.
you act
G4 is not firing lasers through specific circumstances, he's just firing lasers that move externally to himself.

Again, light only appears to bend to a certain extent. It doesn't actually bend in the manner G4 bends it, neither physically nor visually.

It's very disingenuous to say that because light can bend (even though it actually can't), G4 must just be randomly bending light.
you act like phsical light can bend in extreme angels and also can split that what the physics say you don't have anything against it why don't you say clearly we don't wana upgrade Geno's and safe my time
 
Here’s an idea: instead of whining about us “downplaying”, go make a CRT.
 
you act like phsical light can bend in extreme angels and also can split that what the physics say you don't have anything against it why don't you say clearly we don't wana upgrade Geno's and safe my time
I'm literally acting like the opposite. I outright said 'light only appears to bend to a certain extent.' It's an integral part of my entire argument.

You're the one making fallacies out of real science.

As for saving your time, please save my time by improving your grammar (no offence) and fixing your post structure.
 
Last edited:
I've said this before, but I'm actually fine with it being light-speed. What I'm not fine with is some of the horrendous justifications for it not violating the laws of physics, especially since many of the papers and articles are very specific experiments/observations made years after G4 even appeared in the manga.
 
It look Like this or this ? It was like he was able to manipulate certain particles of a laser to bend. even in air
It doesn't look like either of those, and that's just laser reflection. It's not homing lasers that outright curve towards targets at far larger angles.

Again, this is stuff that relies on very, very specific parameters to work.
 
Last edited:
not in this one but google it there's a lot of videos in YouTube with lesser bend experiment also your wiki laws are so old people discover new things Avery day you should check it from time to time , there are no reason to not except light speed feats
You shouldn't expect other people to search the evidence for your position for you, so just post it yourself if it is that easy to find. I'd also like to point out that threads to update rules do come up from time to time, so it's not like as if we insist on them staying as they are. They can always be updated with proper evidence, sources and reasoning and I have in fact seen this happen multiple times.
 
And as someone stated above, how can Saitama specifically know how much strength it takes to destroy the planet? Do you think Saitama one day searched up 'how much force needed to destroy a planet?' and checked to see if he could really do it?
Maybe because Boros CSRC was planet level, just maybe?

When multiple translators agree that the data book translation say that the "ruins" thing is fallacious, since many definitions inside that one have the same definition as "destruction" in japanese and in the context of the statement it is "destroyed" and "erase" the earth. Also the video game introduction of One-Punch Man a Hero Nobody Know we can see Saitama destroying Earth OR the potential effect of CSRC. (Since we saw Boros eye in the background), which after a quick calc' is High 5-A.

  • (Using the Frieza and Death Star logic when the planet mass is hurled at high speed)
It's only a cutscene and a video game, but this game was made with ONE's backing it up and the intro cutscene was one of the biggest selling points for it. You feel like that's where 80% of the budget went. So they wouldn't show Saitama blowing up the Earth if he couldn't do it. Especially if ONE worked on the game and incorporate small lore elements.
 
It's only a cutscene and a video game, but this game was made with ONE's backing it up and the intro cutscene was one of the biggest selling points for it. You feel like that's where 80% of the budget went. So they wouldn't show Saitama blowing up the Earth if he couldn't do it. Especially if ONE worked on the game and incorporate small lore elements.
Yeah they 1000% would. It's a heavily stylised cutscene, and it's entirely within the viewpoint of Boros' pupil. It's the equivalent of saying the opening intro of a show is completely indicative of what kind of power the characters will have.

Also, the CSRC would have done this in the anime. So it very easily could just be referring to that version.
When multiple translators agree that the data book translation say that the "ruins" thing is fallacious, since many definitions inside that one have the same definition as "destruction" in japanese and in the context of the statement it is "destroyed" and "erase" the earth.
What translators? So far, I've seen about one from years ago. This was covered very, very extensively in multiple threads.
 
Last edited:
What translators? So far, I've seen about one from years ago. This was covered very, very extensively in multiple threads.
Translators I asked for r/translator because I can't read Japanese myself, so I annoyed quite a few with the definitions of words and sentence structures.

Also VibhavM (one of the One-Punch Man main fan-translator) got the same conclusion when he translated Boros Databook page. He is the one with his team that translate every chapter to this day. And he is a reliable source, since it's his translated chapters that we use, because he and his team translate better than viz media with their extreme localization and censor.
 
Maybe because Boros CSRC was planet level, just maybe?

When multiple translators agree that the data book translation say that the "ruins" thing is fallacious, since many definitions inside that one have the same definition as "destruction" in japanese and in the context of the statement it is "destroyed" and "erase" the earth. Also the video game introduction of One-Punch Man a Hero Nobody Know we can see Saitama destroying Earth OR the potential effect of CSRC. (Since we saw Boros eye in the background), which after a quick calc' is High 5-A.

  • (Using the Frieza and Death Star logic when the planet mass is hurled at high speed)
CSRC is accepted as planet surface level, if you make a crt making it planet level then obviously Saitama will be 5-B but using evidence for stuff not even accepted on the site won't work. Planet surface is more consistent anyways since it appears in more legitimate mediums of OPM than others (manga and webcomic) while planet level appears in anime (less legit than manga) and data book (less legit than manga and also has debatable meanings for what the translation actually is while the others don't).
It's only a cutscene and a video game, but this game was made with ONE's backing it up and the intro cutscene was one of the biggest selling points for it. You feel like that's where 80% of the budget went. So they wouldn't show Saitama blowing up the Earth if he couldn't do it. Especially if ONE worked on the game and incorporate small lore elements.
Bruh, the argument of "wouldn't show if he couldn't do it" falls flat if I just say "why did Murata show Boros holding the planet if he couldn't do it" the manga volumes are more credible then the games for obvious reasons and the answer for both the volume and the game is simply that the scene looked cool and isn't something that is confirmed to be true.
 
Back
Top