- 9,226
- 3,367
well arale stomps that version anyways so no point in opening that thread back up
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 21,686
- 19,274
I think a month is a bit light for encouraging hackers to destroy the site because people don't agree with your Undertale CRT. Could just be me. If it were my choice, I'd go for 2-3.
- 8,675
- 5,556
I'd say a month.
No idea where Ant's strange interpretation comes from, either. We have no reason to be soft on him.
No idea where Ant's strange interpretation comes from, either. We have no reason to be soft on him.
- 165,348
- 72,617
- Thread starter
- #10,604
Okay. That is fine with me. Are you willing to apply the ban?
He spoke Russian, and there is currently a potential real life massive conflict between NATO and the Russian government about Ukraine (and possibly with the CCP about Taiwan at nearly the same time). That is definitely not an invitation for this forum to start with political talk about the issue though. It is best if we keep things neutral and welcome everybody from all over the world here.
- 30,092
- 25,366
While that's a possibility, I think we should avoid projecting or trying to make excuses for users' behaviour.
- 12,662
- 9,599
I am here to report @XXKINGXX69 for many reasons:
Someone should probably give him a light warning.Not saying my behaviour is absolutely perfect, no one's is, but at least I don't go around calling people boomers or making your mom jokes with those I don't know/joke around with.
- being an irritable person who constantly makes pre-school level jokes and thinks they are funny. Here is a compilation of it.
- And called Amelia a boomer for liking older stories
- He has been extremely disrespectful to various people in the past for no reason and has condescending behaviours in all of the threads he is involved in, thinking he knows better than anyone. To name a few;
- Keeps going in circles and stonewalling threads. Giganta thread, MMH thread, and I don't know how many more.
- Making "jokes" which are irrelevant to the overall thread.
- Multi-posting. It gets annoying after a while
And uses RTs to make comic book CRTs, which is fine mostly, but knowing context is better or else we will be giving high tier resistances to everyone.
Someone should probably give him a light warning.
- 30,092
- 25,366
That amount of issues from just one user seems like it requires a bit more than a light warning.
- 12,662
- 9,599
Yes, he does that often. And keeps going in circles.
- 40,713
- 35,260
Pretty much every thread I've encountered him in he's stone walled to the extremes, light warning offenses add up in this case.
At least 1 month ban.
At least 1 month ban.
5 weeks is more then a month, 4 is nearly a month. 7 days a week and the average days in a month are 30.
- 2,294
- 1,463
Wouldn't it just be better to remove lists of Notable Victories/Losses and Inconclusive Matches from tier 0 characters? I mean, we're not really putting them up against any characters on this wiki a whole lot after all.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 21,686
- 19,274
I gave him a 1 month ban, since I seemed in the minority to hope for more and it doesn't affect me too much.
- 165,348
- 72,617
- Thread starter
- #10,617
Okay. Thank you for the help.
- 165,348
- 72,617
- Thread starter
- #10,618
A strict warning is fine with me given all of the above. He doesn't seem to use grave insults.
- 10,272
- 2,754
A warning is enough. Their childish behavior doesn’t seem to equal profile sabotage or drama seeking, which are my main concerns when dealing out bans. Pre-school level jokes might just mean he might be a young member.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 8,930
- 5,851
He is not, he said and I quote “Noooo Ultima isn't knowledgeable, he is like 15 and uses psuedo mathematics” this was in a QnA thread about low 1C and cause someone quoted Ultima he made that comment, so I am sure he is old enough to know what he is doing but does it anyway to piss people off. I’m sure even a young member should know making “mom jokes” with people you don’t know can easily trigger them and his entire point of those jokes is to trigger the person on the receiving end
And also go through all of his posts/threads he is always an ass to anyone who does not agree with him
- 8,269
- 1,404
banned for your mom jokes
- 10,272
- 2,754
We really shouldn’t project our own life experiences and expectations onto others. I know there are a lot of young friend groups that use “mom jokes” as a form of endearment and have developed a habit of using them to be friendly with others.
That’s why I agree with only a warning since it can bother people.
- 11,802
- 7,366
for killing comedy*
In all seriousness like, try not to light-troll too much, we're not as official as we let one and being an annoyance IS a valid enough reason to ask folks to knock it off.
Fine with warning, ban's too strict.
- 22,572
- 13,849
just to let you know again.
is it wrong to occasionally do it. (i occasionally post an image to go along with something)
it's not like i do it every time. (just rarely)
Coolboy6
He/Him- 7,434
- 6,005
Please. Do not continue this discussion. This is derailing.
- 22,572
- 13,849
okay
- 165,348
- 72,617
- Thread starter
- #10,631
- 5,879
- 1,070
SirOvens did
- 3,633
- 2,506
Cleveland Brown was vandalized and put to Tier 0 among other things.
Someone reverted the tier, but not other stuff (such as the category).
Someone reverted the tier, but not other stuff (such as the category).
- 15,753
- 10,827
i'd like to defend the person in question. They were accidentally inspired by a thread i made and ended up doing it as a joke. They've been acting properly for some time and they're a normal member, not a random troll.
- 3,633
- 2,506
Okay. Then I'd also like to report Arceus0x for not only encouraging this behavior but saying nothing about it and planning on derailing this thread by defending blatant vandalism for at least an hour now.
Their thread should also be closed since it's clearly inspiring vandalism.
- 15,753
- 10,827
i have a choice whether or not i want to report something. I ain't a mod, i have no reason to change edits considering they were more complex than usual and mods can simply revert changes with a back roll.
I call BS on derailing. Derailing is bringing up things that aren't related to a thread, i wanted to defend the person, something people often do.
- 3,709
- 2,885
I disagree with this. The person who made the edit should have used common sense and not have done it. Closing a whole thread seems over one irresponsible person is a bit extreme.
- 8,896
- 7,427
I have reverted the edits completely, though it took me more steps than necessary because I'm on mobile and I kind of got confused.
Anyway, I don't have time to check the other thread in its totality, but vandalism is vandalism, they should have used common sense and these jokes are unacceptable regardless.
I'm inclined to trust them and believe they won't do such things again, so I'm in for a serious warning instead of a ban (but as I haven't checke everything, I'm open to other proposals and arguments).
Anyway, I don't have time to check the other thread in its totality, but vandalism is vandalism, they should have used common sense and these jokes are unacceptable regardless.
I'm inclined to trust them and believe they won't do such things again, so I'm in for a serious warning instead of a ban (but as I haven't checke everything, I'm open to other proposals and arguments).
- 11,802
- 7,366
Arc's actions aren't reportable imo, although @Lavinrac should be banned very blatantly because they knowingly vandalized it, it's not any different from when a rando vandalizes it except very minor semantics
Yes we got the part it's a joke already, that doesn't defend shit.
Similar threads
