- 69
- 61
What tier is this monster?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What tier is this monster?
probably not as impressive as the meteor featwas Saitama's punch against Genos (I know it's anime only) calculated? I'm just curious
he can but why would he, he shot at the building only but his force was to powerful that it destroyed the top of two mountains Murata said he destroyed the mountain but in the panel it wasn't clear that doesn't mean he can't just because that never happen the guy ask if genos destroyed the mountain murata said he did regardless of it was clear or not that imply genos can destroy a mountain that mean he is 7-A if he can't Murata would simply just say Genos can't destroy a mountain now please don't say but he didn't that would be the 100th time someone say that give answer me why murata didnt say Genos can't do thatExcept the art literally says otherwise. If he wanted Genos to destroy the whole mountain, he would've drawn that. You're getting it from nowhere.
Could very well be. It caused pretty huge damage. even the clouds were reshaped.probably not as impressive as the meteor feat
Because mountains busting isn't always mountain level and we clearly see he didn't destroy the entire mountain.he can but why would he, he shot at the building only but his force was to powerful that it destroyed the top of two mountains Murata said he destroyed the mountain but in the panel it wasn't clear that doesn't mean he can't just because that never happen the guy ask if genos destroyed the mountain murata said he did regardless of it was clear or not that imply genos can destroy a mountain that mean he is 7-A if he can't Murata would simply just say Genos can't destroy a mountain now please don't say but he didn't that would be the 100th time someone say that give answer me why murata didnt say Genos can't do that
mountain busting isn't 7-A when the mountain is small even if genos didn't destroy the mountain that's doesn't mean he can't ifBecause mountains busting isn't always mountain level and we clearly see he didn't destroy the entire mountain.
Plus Murata isn't the Author here so we shouldn't be taking his word as fact.
What tier is this monster?
destroying mountains that are stated to be mountains is low 7-B at minimummountain busting isn't 7-A when the mountain is small even if genos didn't destroy the mountain that's doesn't mean he can't if
he can't murata would say to that guy who said did Genos destroy the mountain no Geno's didn't destroy the mountain because he can't instead he said yes genos did destroy the mountain
2- murta have the right he know how powerful is a character because he is the one make stronger in the manga he share with one a lot in the manga he said geru can throw rooks close to light speed and said that the horned monster that get low diftit by pori is deep sea king level and many things and you sai we shouldn't take his words just now why
I think Sonic implied they are the same.By the way, is it confirmed the Paradiser Suits are the Neo Hero Suits?
I don't think so. Also the designs vary which could also mean its just another variant of it.By the way, is it confirmed the Paradiser Suits are the Neo Hero Suits?
Well i mean there is a very high chance that the Neo Organization and "that" orginzation are connected especially since there both very technological.I checked, and Sonic says they remind him of them based on their lack of skill. So they might not be the same.
HopefullyHopefully 142 comes out soon and clarifies everything.
Not really. The size for Z city was calced from the Tatsumaki feat only. So we can confidently say that she affected the entirety of the city.Also i had a question about Z city size, specifically the tats feat, the tats feat doesn't cover the entirety of Z city right? when i say city i mean like the country size that it is. her feat only covers areas that have actual buildings right?
I'm still slightly confused on why the meteor is labeled as it is cuz shouldn't its impact be much bigger.
whydestroying mountains that are stated to be mountains is low 7-B at minimum
Read the Mountain and Island Level requirements page. It'll clear confusions.
but she didn't cuz even right now Garou, FF, King, PPP, PS, etc literally everyone is standing on flat ruined ground in z city.Not really. The size for Z city was calced from the Tatsumaki feat only. So we can confidently say that she affected the entirety of the city.
it is the minimum calculated power. To destroy a mountain with the baseline fragmentation (just shattering it) would require low 7-B energy.
it is the minimum calculated power. To destroy a mountain with the baseline fragmentation (just shattering it) would require low 7-B energy.
There's also the fact that the minimum mountain size is 619.6 meters
it is the minimum calculated power. To destroy a mountain with the baseline fragmentation (just shattering it) would require low 7-B energy.
There's also the fact that the minimum mountain size is 619.6 meters
They aren't standing on ruined ground, it's the the buildings' rubble that has progressively become more and more fragmented due to the ongoing battles. Tatsumaki was the one who cause the city to turn into rubble in the first place.but she didn't cuz even right now Garou, FF, King, PPP, PS, etc literally everyone is standing on flat ruined ground in z city.
Unless ur saying they exited the city.
So just the city was affected by tats then, not the outside areas of z city which make it much larger...They aren't standing on ruined ground, it's the the buildings' rubble that has progressively become more and more fragmented due to the ongoing battles. Tatsumaki was the one who cause the city to turn into rubble in the first place.
you know what forget about it I give alot but all what you say don't make sense I don't wana spent more time in that the weird thing is they're more downgrade than the upgrade and literally every feat got a downgrade I don't know why there's a lot to say but that is waste
If he doesn't specify big or small, then assuming medium is also not quite the right thing since that was technically not specified as well.that the minimum not the medium if he say just mountain and didn't say big or small we scale genos to the medium size of mountain wish is above 1000 meter's since the smallest is 619.6
I don't think that you need to repeat yourself with a quote.you know what forget about it I give alot but all why you say don't make sense I don't wana spent more time in that the weird thing is they're more downgrade than the upgrade and literally every feat got a downgrade I don't know why there's a lot to say but that is waste
]Guys, intead of throwing away the City level+ calc, why don't just use both if the High 7-A end is only a "Possibly" ?
"At least City level+, possibly Large Mountain level" using the two ends should work, I think ?
what do you meanIf he doesn't specify big or small, then assuming medium is also not quite the right thing since that was technically not specified as well.
I don't think that you need to repeat yourself with a quote.
You said that not specifying whether or not a mountain is small or large means that we should consider the mountain medium sized which is an assumption.what do you mean
If you are referring to the first point:what do you mean
Ok, ok. I guess we can possibly get the size of the mountain. In one of the panels we see the pine trees arranged in rows on one of the mountains. So, we may assume that the ridges on the mountain are the trees. We could get the most logical size from that and wouldn't require any form of lowball or highball.If you are referring to the first point:
When you give several ends for a feat, it is always safer to go with the low end rather than any other end because, in almost every case, it is the only end which has 100% accuracy on what actually happened. Upper ends tend to be based on more shaky assumptions and could be proved wrong somewhat easily.
I agree a lot of feats are "downgraded" (though I would call it "underapreciated" or low balled) but it is the most logically and scientifically correct way of building the scaling of a verse. So see it as a minimum, not as Vs battles being objectively wrong on the feat's appreciation. Hope that cleared something.