- 4,406
- 1,334
https://cdn.**********.com/attachme...852762798668120084/Pc3LJ8UDRNaHXju20OvFrg.png
how is it not touching? Are you seeing something that I'm not?Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thats also a huge assumption.I meant upper layer (as in crust), or the civilization layer (even more commonly referred to as "surface" than the crust layer) as an alternative.
The definition of surface is the uppermost layer of something. Boros said, "...wipe you out together with this planet's surface." If hes talking about the planet's surface (uppermost layer), he would obviously be talking about the crust, which includes the oceanic crust. As we know, water can't get burned. We cant use scorching for CSRC.@Kacho So is assuming that the entire crust will be blown away. They don't actually say the crust, just the surface.
Like Tetsu said, theres no way he didn't know or see oceans when arriving at earth. He would know how to get to the continental and oceanic crusts.@Kachon123 How do we know that when he's says planet surface, he's taking into a account the oceanic crust? Afaik, most exoplanets don't have an ocean of liquid
Isn't that what we're arguing as well? What are you proposing exactly?Plus, even if we discard the whole, "crust, or no crusts" arguments, Oceans are part of the earth's surface, and you can't "wipe out" oceans by scorching, so scorching is still out of the window.
Most of the surface is measured above the ocean. Also, he could just not be vaporizing the ocean like he would be scorching land.Plus, even if we discard the whole, "crust, or no crusts" arguments, Oceans are part of the earth's surface, and you can't "wipe out" oceans by scorching, so scorching is still out of the window.
Well, to wipe out means to eliminate completely, so wouldn't vaporization also work?Isn't that what we're arguing as well? What are you proposing exactly?
I think using the 183 petaton explosion calc is probably the safest method for now
That's only when he walks towards the control roomI swear there's a scan where Boros is looking at Saitama on a monitor.
So it barely changed then.He does, IIRC. It's likely that he'd know there's water if there's organic life, as well.
Anyway, the new high-end is Large Town level.
Oh okay.That's only when he walks towards the control room
Well. In addition to the direct frontal impact of Saitama's punch, only the impact on the back side showed a larger area of impact than the original area of the csrc. I disagreement that the scope isn't good enough.CSRC is 1586 petatons.
If some of CSRC's energy survived the Serious Punch, that was because Saitama A) underestimated how much energy he needed to cancel CSRC by a little or B) said energy was outside the Serious Punch's area of effect. Since Saitama is normally pretty good at proportioning the power of his punches for his enemies, I think it's B), that also makes sense the way the serious punch and CSRC were fanning out from their respective origin points
You can’t use vaporization without it being stated and/or there’s visible vapor.Well, to wipe out means to eliminate completely, so wouldn't vaporization also work?
Concrete isn't stone, it's a composite material. I know you already know that, my point is that saying that concrete doesn't melt in a typical fashion has nothing to do with whether or not stone "scorches". When I say "scorch" I am referring to the combustion process. Broadly, we could take scorching to mean disfiguring a substance. When you do that to stone, particularly heat resistant stone like granite, it melts. Granite does not start deforming in such a fashion until it is pretty much melting and that is 75% of the crust that is being destroyed here. If you heat up the atmosphere high enough to scorch all of the crust (AKA melt it), you're probably just making the process more energy intensive. After all, CSRC needs to effect nearly all of the crust, if that energy is being transmitted through the atmosphere first it's going to be a lot more inefficient that it would be if we looked at the energy to heat up all the crust to said point, just because of the surface area problem. And the ocean problem.Some forms of concrete melt, some forms also don't because they just completely lose integrity. Even the site you nabbed from (a Quora-esque site, no less) says this. If it can melt the surface of the planet, that's completely up to you to prove because we don't actually have any statement suggesting he can. Also, you were the one who brought up the argument that stone doesn't scorch, I'm just debunking that argument and showing that it actually scorches before it melts.
Firey as they are (something I never disagreed with and can also prove my point), Boros' blasts produce destructive shockwaves even more than they melt stuff. You need to read the manga again.
It could very well scorch the surface, though. Also, as I told Emirp, noting suggests that the entire crust of the planet will be scorched, surface can just refer to the top layer and not the crust/upper crust. Notably, you can't scorch water in the first place, and many surface-wiping feats/statements actually don't refer to the literal crust of the entire planet.
No, vaporization is pulled out of thin air. Literally nothing suggests full-scale vaporization and melting.