• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Some Nuclear Stuff

Status
Not open for further replies.

ByAsura

He/Him
VS Battles
Administrator
22,044
18,129

Dr. Bright Durability w/SCP-963​

Edit: Never mind. Efficiency is, from my understanding, the amount of nuclear fuel that undergoes fission.

Tsar Bomba Yield and Nuclear Discrepancies​

The 58 (57 is actually the more common figure) megaton yield was calculated by America and circulated by Russia, but 50 megatons is believed to be the private position of the latter. This was during the Cold War, so Russia would likely want America as scared as possible. These discrepancies should be noted.

A lot of nuclear weapons yields aren't really exact, either. For example, Little Boy is believed to be between 12-18 kilotons, and 15 is the middle-ground.
 
Last edited:
I do agree that Nuclear weapons aren't exactly exact with their yields; Tsar Bomba was originally stated to be 100 megatons, but lowered it to 50 after some recalculations and it was also stated Russia could produce a 100 Megaton bomb if they wished. Though, the durability to survive a bomb should stull use Inverse Square law.
 
In this case, he probably means point-blank. He doesn't specify range, and he could high-ball it to pretty much anything, like "I could survive a planet-killing asteroid", just because he's at a distance.

Edit: They're talking about blowing it up in this context, no one is boasting about surviving anything. So point-blank seems like a far better assumption.
 
Last edited:
Even point blank; it might be best to compare his cross sectional area to the surface area of the nuke.
 
That'd be kind of difficult without some assumptions, but using 1 metre gets 2.56 teratons since I can't work off surface area here. Technically, he still wouldn't even take the full blast even if he was laying down on the explosives (that's assuming the explosives are comparable in surface area), which is a thread I've been planning to make in the future.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top