-
Tyranno223 Mr. Bambu Tyranno223 wrote on Mr. Bambu's profile.
Hey Bambu, noticed I missed a an obvious implication (plus a flat-out dumb dumb error of mine) of the latest LotR revisions, but I also noticed another one.
"For one of the hungry Houseless, if it is admitted to the friendship of the Living, may seek to eject the fea from its body; and in the contest for mastery the body may be gravely injured, even if it is not wrested from its rightful habitant. Or the Houseless may plead for shelter, and if it is admitted, then it will seek to enslave its host and use both his will and his body for its own purposes. It is said that Sauron did these things, and taught his followers how to achieve them."
So the implication is that Incarnates/The Children of Eru (given the bodies of the Ainur are but raiment + this is universal statement regarding possession) can resist possession by "wrestling" with the soul trying to take control of their body.
But does this also come with limited Soul Manipulation/Extra Resistance to Soul Manipulation given they are directly combatting the soul within their body?
"For one of the hungry Houseless, if it is admitted to the friendship of the Living, may seek to eject the fea from its body; and in the contest for mastery the body may be gravely injured, even if it is not wrested from its rightful habitant. Or the Houseless may plead for shelter, and if it is admitted, then it will seek to enslave its host and use both his will and his body for its own purposes. It is said that Sauron did these things, and taught his followers how to achieve them."
So the implication is that Incarnates/The Children of Eru (given the bodies of the Ainur are but raiment + this is universal statement regarding possession) can resist possession by "wrestling" with the soul trying to take control of their body.
But does this also come with limited Soul Manipulation/Extra Resistance to Soul Manipulation given they are directly combatting the soul within their body?
I can reopen it now, though.