- 10,883
- 12,296
So, I'm sure everyone that debates Accelerator knows the debate:
"Can Accelerator reflect an energy beam stronger than anything he has demonstrated to manipulate, because his reflection is hax and doesn't relate to magnitude, or is that a No Limits Fallacy."
The guys in the To Aru Discussion thread thought it is time to debate that once again, so let's get this over with.
My opinion on the topic is what is currently written in the note of Accelerators page:
Or differently said: Maybe it is hax, but unless we get certain proof of that better not assume and give him a stat.
Opinions?
"Can Accelerator reflect an energy beam stronger than anything he has demonstrated to manipulate, because his reflection is hax and doesn't relate to magnitude, or is that a No Limits Fallacy."
The guys in the To Aru Discussion thread thought it is time to debate that once again, so let's get this over with.
My opinion on the topic is what is currently written in the note of Accelerators page:
Note: There are two schools of interpretation about Accelerators passive reflection. One interpretations states that his reflection only changes the direction of the vectors, but does not involve their magnitude. By that interpretation the magnitude of the attack does not matter, but only whether or not the attack has a vector and if Accelerator can calculate it. Another interpretation assumes that the ability involves magnitude and by that is limited to reflecting attacks of the energy Accelerator was shown to control. None of the two interpretations could give certain proof for their interpretation to this point. The current durability statistic of Accelerator is made by assuming the latter interpretation. |
Opinions?