Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he understands the attack and it has a vector, he can reflect itThe real cal howard said:This is...unbelievably confusing, I'm sorry. Could you dumb it down for me, for lack of a better term?
I think it's going to be scaled to universe level, which would be listed on the page, limit or not.Scrlk666777 said:Has anything been decided in regards to Accel's reflection? Is the limit going to be removed or kept on for now?
I'm sorry, what? Promstein stated that he was "torn" on the subject, thus she could not choose a side, so please stop inserting things into other people's mouths.Matthew Schroeder said:I share DontTalk's and Promestein's opinion. It is utter nonsense to assume that Accelerator can reflect any attack regardless of potency because of his hax.
Well, that's because we know the medium for it. The reason why offensive hax don't get called NLF as often is because we know the medium by which they are effective over raw stats. Vector Manip here has done the same thing but with defensive hax, his ability simply but problematically does not account for the strength of the attack.Matthew Schroeder said:Sure but though it makes some sense mathematically, acting like it can reflect up to 3-A attacks while there are no feats to back that up is... Really problematic for an obvious reason. It's giving an extreme amount of special treatement for To Aru when we really don't do the same for any other verse.
NLF powers like "Invulnerability" and the like are almost never treated as such.
3-A's being merged with High 3-A now. You're fine with Accelerator being considered able to reflect infinite 3D attacks?Matthew Schroeder said:If there is a legitimately 3-A potency attack he reflected that's fine as his limit.