[Toaru] Alice Anotherbible's Resistances

[Felience1]

Alice doesn't suddenly become immune to something just because it passes the skin barrier. Her physical body barely matters with what she can do, but her body still takes the effects from them they just don't bother her.

I don't even know where this comes from.

She's not 'resisting' a bullet if it shot into her through her skin and is suddenly lodged in her chest- just like she's not immune to bugs just cause they ate through her skin and are now eating her lungs. Her body is still taking the damage and effects. It just literally doesn't bother her cause the body isn't really part of who she is, it's a stand in.

Same as above. The bugs can damage her skins not her internals. What are you talking about in the last part about her not being her body?

Also like she blatantly takes internal damage from physical strikes like touma's punches, so like the idea in general that once it passes the skin it no longer bothers her or she's suddenly resisting it is ?????

What is the blatant internal damage? and getting punched is external damage.

Also curtana doesn't have range attacks with the cuts, if you have curtana you can't cut into academy city from Britain. You cut out with the sword and it has at most a 20 meter range with the dimension slice or whatever it's called attack.

correct 20m is the quote i gave and what a am saying i don't even know why you bring planetary ranges. Is not like the range matters for her resistance.

The quote your using to explain the coordinated cut is saying that if they cut where accelerators barrier starts it will get through. Not 'if I stand 40 feet away I can cut through your barrier by specifically targeting it'

The omnidimensional slice spell has 20 meter range. That spell was being used on him. I don't know what you are trying to say.

 

[Felience1]

That doesn't sound like the perspective of an omniscient narrator.

I am not saying that she is an inmortal tier 0. It says that because of her resistances and abilities making her difficult to be dealt with. Do you want him to say "oh yes that character of GT56 can kill her but only him" or something like that. Or do you want him to name every single thing that could feasible kill her before she takes action? Him not giving you the full information there does not mean he lies as a narrator for no reason in this convenient place and not in any other thing. If the narrator lies in Toaru is to hide someone's death or something like that not because he feels like giving character abilities wrong descriptions.

Well, yeah, it was never used against her. Just like every other abilities you're trying to get her to resist.

Correct that is what i am saying. The only prove that Cold Mistress works is Bologna says so with doubt several times. I will believe that and not add that resistance. Every other ability has a statement saying it should be resisted. So now we should not believe this part but the less clear Cold Mistress yes? We should believe both. That is what the author gave us.

If anything, it supports my point that the narrator is only conveying Touma's thoughts on the situation. Especially since this is has also been directly contradicted by Kamachi. He literally told us that Alice was killed by Othinus, so Cold Mistress is obviously not the only spell that can work on her.

How is her saying that is the only spell that may work on her supporting your point. Throwing Gungnir is not a spell.
And that quote is talking about regular trascendents could have killed othinus but they didn't and they are afraid of Alice. The narration separates Alice from Trascendents by saying that that is the reason they are so afraid of Alice. If Alice was part of that "trascendents" is she afraid of herself? Anyways i am not adding resistance to Gungnir so this is irrelevant and it even says that they can without seal. I think that they does not include Alice because of what is written right after but it doesn't matter if it does.
Since i am not adding that now and it is not a spell.

Crushing someone's head causes brain damage. She did walk around without a head later on, but we're explicitly told that she had to revive herself, and that CRC's attack did kill her.

How does she have brain damage if she can fight normally without head? Sure her head is no longer there but it doesn't affect her. And yes she revives herself because someone killed her with an external attack. She has a weird physiology we don't now if that caused internal damage or not since we don't even know if she has a brain.

Right, and I would imagine that those pages have more justification than just "built different". Because that's all we know about Alice's constitution. Her being remade from magic doesn't tell us anything regarding what makes her internally different.

The justification of direct statements from the author of what her physhiology does. Why do we need to now how it exactly works to add what it does if we know what it does?

The way y'all are arguing makes it sound like all instances of damage simply vanish as soon as it reaches "inside" her.

Maybe, we don't know. I won't argue how it works because we don't know.

The entire point of my post was to show that I don't believe the narrator to be an accurate source of information in this instance.

I believe he is accurate and i don't see a single exception to the rule.

You're arguing that the internal damage caused by an external attack is resisted. The two quote literally contradict this. In the first case, CRC crushed her head (external attack) and Alice suffered brain damage (internal damage) that killed her.

In the second case, she clashed fists with Touma (external attack) which caused some kind of internal damage to make her legs shake.

Is it said that what causes the death is brain damage and i don't remember it?

There are explanations for that. Supernatural physiology, Imagine Breaker. Just emotions of her killing the most important thing to her.

So Fiamma's pain manipulation counts as internal damage, but not Bologna's? That's convenient.

Of course, it is litteraly written as the only spell that has a chance or working. Are you going to take the part of the statement about Cold Mistress not working possibly and forget about the part saying it is an exception? And she could be wrong anyways and the spell does not work.

The statements were contradicted by having Alice directly suffer internal damage and having Cold Mistress be named as a weakness multiple times.

Show me where it is said that Alice recieves internal damage.

Named as a possible weakness. Even if it was a weakness it is just that. The only spell that works because that is a weakness.