- 3,247
- 3,612
Pretty much.But won't it be a concept anymore?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pretty much.But won't it be a concept anymore?
I didn't understand broPretty much.
Yes, in the anime in the English dub version it is referring to it as an idea of the concept of order and justice, I posted it in my comment above, but all quotes and guides agree with it being a conceptJust wanted to say that IZ is described as an "ethereal form" in the dub, so we do have some information on his nature.
Yes we have pretty much enough explaination over what Zamasu is but for being concept, there must be a good enough explaination on its relation to the object which are bounds to it.... Which there is none.Just wanted to say that IZ is described as an "ethereal form" in the dub, so we do have some information on his nature
Why don't you think he can become both, I think it's possible because he has 2 different ideals, even Gowasu says the same, which is to erase the entire mortal universe (trying to be the Universe) and put the new order (trying to be justice and order itself)He did became the most efficient thing there could to execute his ideals throughout the universe, and that is becoming the Universe and it's spacetime itself, he has now approach to every corner to every point in time to execute and spread his zero mortal ideal.
It's not hyperbole, it's been discussed several times and I accept that it's not a hyperbolic quote, so stop mentioning it.No, he's not the concept. he never became justice in a literal sense, it was meant metaphorically.
Because the concept is stretched and has no explanation regarding it's nature to grant it. We don't grant direct mention of concept being concept in literal sense unless explaination is present. Here on the other hand we are open for interpretation.Why don't you think he can become both, I think it's possible because he has 2 different ideals, even Gowasu says the same, which is to erase the entire mortal universe (trying to be the Universe) and put the new order (trying to be justice and order itself)
It is, i'll keep mentioning it, since that's how it was used. He's not justice in a literal sense, he doesn't embody the concept.It's not hyperbole, it's been discussed several times and I accept that it's not a hyperbolic quote, so stop mentioning it.
That shall be for its own CRT.His justification should definitely be changed if this passes, but his Regen should stay.
So? Context exists."Zamasu is trying to become Justice and order" is literally stated.
Uh... The erasure he's regenerating from is already accepted.That shall be for its own CRT.
Now he's gonna be Mid Godly instead.
You need to regen from information type 2, or concepts in order to get HGRUh... The feat he's regenerating from is already accepted.
I'm talking about History/Timeline EE. Which is what happens in SDBH.You need to regen from information type 2, or concepts in order to get HGR
Regen from your mind is Mid-godly.
Although there is little blunty explanation, but it is still possible to see what Zamasu manifests, proving his ideal and ultimately becoming himself, a long chain of development that has manifested throughout. During the saga, I think it quite obviousBecause the concept is stretched and has no explanation regarding it's nature to grant it. We don't grant direct mention of concept being concept in literal sense unless explaination is present. Here on the other hand we are open for interpretation.
I don't see him doing it for the part 1 to grant it. How it is dependent over him being concept or not?You need to regen from information type 2, or concepts in order to get HGR
Regen from your mind is Mid-godly.
We are stretching things for something that in the end doesn't going to be accepted tbh.Although there is little blunty explanation, but it is still possible to see what Zamasu manifests, proving his ideal and ultimately becoming himself, a long chain of development that has manifested throughout. During the saga, I think it quite obvious
I literally proposed a justification change, because his current one doesn't reflect that.Regeneration [High-Godly] & Immortality [Types 1, 2, 3 & 4] (Came back[1] after being erased[2] as Infinite Zamasu - the abstract ideas/concepts of order and justice of the universe[3][4][5][2], by Zen'ō along with the timeline. Instantly regenerated his body after Jiren completely obliterated him, and stated that he will continuously rehabilitate no matter what happens to him, stated by narrator to be an immortal god. Should be similar to his DBS counterpart, and so, he should be able to replicate his feat of turning into Infinite Zamasu but on a much larger scale)
That does not sound like history erasure lol.
why does the dub matter?Just wanted to say that IZ is described as an "ethereal form" in the dub, so we do have some information on his nature.
Is it SDBH one? Because I don't see it in anime profile one.Regeneration [High-Godly] & Immortality [Types 1, 2, 3 & 4] (Came back[1] after being erased[2] as Infinite Zamasu - the abstract ideas/concepts of order and justice of the universe[3][4][5][2], by Zen'ō along with the timeline. Instantly regenerated his body after Jiren completely obliterated him, and stated that he will continuously rehabilitate no matter what happens to him, stated by narrator to be an immortal god. Should be similar to his DBS counterpart, and so, he should be able to replicate his feat of turning into Infinite Zamasu but on a much larger scale)
That does not sound like history erasure lol.
It does? Unless proven otherwise.why does the dub matter?
Yes.Is it SDBH one? Because I don't see it in anime profile one.
How do you know? The "concept" appearing in a verse that tends to be martial arts and fighting seems a bit difficult. It was also mentioned in the CRT that IZ became the concept, it was eventually accepted. Magical can be anywhere even on this forumWe are stretching things for something that in the end doesn't going to be accepted tbh.
Then that's something that is not related to the OP, SDBH and anime one are different, not to mention that it being contradiction in anime doesn't mean it being contradiction in SDBH. If anyone want to change it or anything that would need a another thread as it highly depends on justifications and other things to be discussed properly. This thread is pretty much concluded over only removing justification of canon one (most staff already agreed so discussing these things here would cause other things to be accepted as well w/o it being in the OP, so I'll suggest to not discuss it here). So it's finished.Yes.
Yeah, seems iffy to meI dunno, because you get that only if said explicitly iirc.
Otherwise every Tier 2 destruction needs High Godly to recover from.
I suggest to conclude this thread here for just the concept description of canon one to be removed as it has been pretty much accepted. It'll be unfair if other things get into a discussion and get accepted w/o everyone having their parts to explain and we wouldn't know if staff members are looking at OP or other things related in the thread.I dunno, because you get that only if said explicitly iirc.
Otherwise every Tier 2 destruction needs High Godly to recover from.
Ig so...I suggest to conclude this thread here for just the concept description of canon one to be removed as it has been pretty much accepted. It'll be unfair if other things get into a discussion and get accepted w/o everyone having their parts to explain and we wouldn't know if staff members are looking at OP or other things related in the thread.
a dub has no priority over the original materialIt does? Unless proven otherwise.
Original is same unless proven otherwise.a dub has no priority over the original material
so?How do you know? The "concept" appearing in a verse that tends to be martial arts and fighting seems a bit difficult.
in which this crt is changing itIt was also mentioned in the CRT that IZ became the concept, it was eventually accepted. Magical can be anywhere even on this forum
no? why would that be the assumption? we always look the original materialOriginal is same unless proven otherwise.
That's always has been a assumption here.no? why would that be the assumption? we always look the original material
since when?That's always has been a assumption here.