Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rolled back edits and warned.Reporting MavEvolt04 for editing these profiles without permission.
Kamen Rider Evol
Kamen Rider Oma Zi-O
Kamen Rider Zi-O
Kamen Rider Decade
Deleted.Calc speed naruto blizt kaguya
pic 1 : -đầu nar : 44 px -Thân nar : 208 px - Chân nar : 102 px 44 + 208 + 102 px = 354 px chiều cao thật của naruto : 166 cm 1 px tương ứng với naruto :0.46892655367 cm vì khung hình quá nhỏ k thể đo được nên t chỉ lấy chiều cao của kaguya là 44 px 1 px tương ứng vs kaguya : 3.97727272727 cm...vsbattles.fandom.com
I want to speak on this, by the way.Clearly a troll. Easy permaban
Case by case, if it's just moderate wank/downplay, I agree permaban less often. But if it's severe "Upgrade to 1-A or Tier 0 or above Omnipotence", that's a different story. Or if they're inserting blatant nonsense/gibberish or worse some words that are taboo via Fandom TOS, permaban would be in order.I want to speak on this, by the way.
I think we should instantly perma-ban less often for not-directly harmful edits. This is obviously someone ******* around with our pages, which is against the rules and annoying as hell. However, I wonder how many of these people were trying to get an edit on our wiki, given that this is a requirement to sign up here on the forum (for the uninformed, this is what we require). To sign up, they are told to make an edit. It's not a very harmful thing he did to the profile, it's just childish and stupid. Let's wait and see.
Yeah, I get that. In this case the dude just screwed with the words on the page. Obvious trolls shall be shot on sight, I've no issue with that sentiment- I just don't agree with what an obvious troll is, I think.Case by case, if it's just moderate wank/downplay, I agree permaban less often. But if it's severe "Upgrade to 1-A or Tier 0 or above Omnipotence", that's a different story. Or if they're inserting blatant nonsense/gibberish or worse some words that are taboo via Fandom TOS, permaban would be in order.
It was a directly very harmful blatant troll edit. I definitely think that a quick permanent ban is warranted in this and other similar cases.I want to speak on this, by the way.
I think we should instantly perma-ban less often for not-directly harmful edits. This is obviously someone ******* around with our pages, which is against the rules and annoying as hell. However, I wonder how many of these people were trying to get an edit on our wiki, given that this is a requirement to sign up here on the forum (for the uninformed, this is what we require). To sign up, they are told to make an edit. It's not a very harmful thing he did to the profile, it's just childish and stupid. Let's wait and see.
The edit was reverted by Garrixian, and I gave a warning.https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Sasuke_Uchiha_(New_Era)?diff=prev&oldid=8433235
Sasuke's New Era key speed rating was changed without any accepted CRT.
So about this...Also, I think that new members are asked to post a message on their wiki wall or to edit their own user page to help them get accepted. If not, that should be corrected.
Statistic ratings, information changes, and pretty much any major modifications. Use your common sense.At what point does an edit without an CRT become vandalism? Are all edits vandalism?
If there’s a value (ex- Subsonic) with no/little justification and I add/rewrite the justification (Ex- Subsonic (kept up with random character)) Is that vandalism?
I am a non-staff user and have made hundreds of minor edits to various pages which weren't treated as vandalism. These included grammar and spelling fixes, minor wording changes, minor category additions, alphabetizing categories, adding trivial details about characters and stories, and more.At what point does an edit without an CRT become vandalism? Are all edits vandalism?
Catzlaflame handled it.I accidentally reverted it back, can someone fix my mistake
Maybe, but I wonder if our current instructions even mention that new members should post a message on their wiki wall or to edit their own user page to help them get accepted in our forum.Rare is the new user who listens to instructions, I reckon.
Catzlaflame handled that as well.This looks like some ol tomfoolery.Reverse-Flash (CW)
Professor Eobard Thawne (c. 2151), also known as the Reverse-Flash, is a major antagonist in the CW series; The Flash. He is a scientist from the future who idolized the Flash to the point that he replicated the accident to become a speedster meta-human. But when he travelled back in time...vsbattles.fandom.com
We've discussed this in the related chat, but our rules are here, and our attempted sign-up message was adjusted to this:Maybe, but I wonder if our current instructions even mention that new members should post a message on their wiki wall or to edit their own user page to help them get accepted in our forum.
Can somebody check please?
The question is whether they are sufficiently guided to that Information page before signing up. The new signup message has had some success, but most accounts are still rejected on the basis of having no obvious signs of activity or use. Some are given time to send a message if the account appears semi-active (having a non-default profile picture, a linked Discord, etc)- in these cases they are given some days to respond to the above message.You tried to register into our forum, but did not have any edits in the wiki. Please reply to this message to confirm your account, or contact AKM sama for help: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:AKM_sama
And furthermore, please read the following page for instructions regarding how to become a productive member of this community: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Welcome_Message
Thank you. I think that it seems informative enough as it is currently.We've discussed this in the related chat, but our rules are here
I think that we made our new signup message sufficiently informative.and our attempted sign-up message was adjusted to this:
The question is whether they are sufficiently guided to that Information page before signing up. The new signup message has had some success, but most accounts are still rejected on the basis of having no obvious signs of activity or use. Some are given time to send a message if the account appears semi-active (having a non-default profile picture, a linked Discord, etc)- in these cases they are given some days to respond to the above message.
One of the highest ranked Fandom staff members has rejected my requests in this area multiple times, so I, Medeus, Catzlaflame, and Garrixian will unfortunately have to continue to post welcome messages with information to new members manually almost every day.I seem to recall discussion regarding those old automated welcome messages that would automatically send to new users of the wiki, which would be the best way to get someone a guaranteed link to the Instructions page (which is the most thorough way of ensuring people have actually read the steps), but iirc that was straight up discontinued by Fandom. I don't have any immediate ideas about how we might improve upon this, aside from perhaps further adjusting the sign-up message to include a link to the instructions for more in-depth details. I don't think the latter idea will have a substantial impact, but I'd be pleased to be proven wrong.
Permablocked for Vandalism.This user changed this profile tier to Tier 1 that's either unwarranted or, even if it was by chance was, not obviously approved. Also rather childish in calling out to people here for "not reading".
Going by their profile, this is literally their first edit so...