The_Yellow_Topaz
She/Her- 1,477
- 1,512
This post gave me a seizure and cataracts simultaneously. That said...
I agree with the basis for the argument against Mettaton's upgrade. Even if it is possible for Mettaton to be higher tiered, this reaches into the realm of outright unlikelihood given the evidence against it. I would like it to be known to all that even a "possibly" rating requires significant implications, and a lack of significant counter-evidence, which this particular upgrade does not have.
My formatting got roasted, ain't no way boi.
That being said.
That being said.
I would like it to be known to all that even a "possibly" rating requires significant implications, and a lack of significant counter-evidence, which this particular upgrade does not have.
May I use these words as the standard, along with the "possibly" description of the AP page from now on? It's best to have objectivity on things like these.
I find it challenging to engage with individuals who consider something as a foundation or evidence, even though it is completely unrelated to what they are attempting to demonstrate. Take, for instance, the Alphys argument presented by the OP. They argue that Alphys, being knowledgeable about human strength and possessing intelligence, should have the potential to create a robot capable of killing humans. How can I effectively convey to them that this is a significant logical leap? Merely possessing those two attributes does not serve as a basis for Alphys' engineering capabilities or the technological level of the fictional world, which is what they truly need to establish.