- 13,228
- 21,044
Everything seems fine to me tbh, including the plot hax given that the world of the Arabian Nights is verbatim comprised of text
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since when does higher-D erasure mean you can nuke the plot of lower-D things? I know VSBW tends to be very attached to certain defensive haxes only being useful against attacks on the same dimensional level, but arguing that higher-D EE can automatically target the narratives of lower realities is a bridge too far if you ask me.@Greenshifter You keep saying that like that's remotely stated as the only way to destroy the arabian world, especially when this is a higher dimensional erasure that's happening in the first place, meaning plot erasure would be irrelevant as it's just nuking everything on a higher level and not specifically targeting someone at a very specific aspect of existence.
Disagree, NEP is an example. How would being able to affect more things which exist allow you to hit something which doesn't exist?You do realize with higher D erasure it doesn't matter what the lower D stuff has
Can you destroy a story of a 2D square going to a 2D mall? I have no idea how tbh, sure I could intervene while he's going to the mall, but what about the part of the story where he leaves his 2D house?the same way we see 2-D drawings as insignificant
I'd argue EE is a very potent form of matter and deconstruction hax but I digress.has matter and deconstruction hax
You made a general statement, I gave a specific example to disprove said statement. Don't come crying about red herrings when you're the one making general statements.Except we're not talking about NEP, we're talking about an actual story book world, two completely different things.
How can I burn the story of the square going to the mall when part of it happened in the past? It would happen in real time and it wouldn't be in a book or something, it could be on a table for example. Heck you can't even argue qualitative transcendence grants you this ability because Sonic's entire cosmology is made up of quantitative transcendences instead.Yes by burning the entire story to the point nothing remains, seriously how is this an argument against the plot erasure being not legit?
I already addressed your point by stating that the AN is made entirely out of narratives which is already accepted and you haven't countered.You're not addressing my point, where is this remotely relevant to the conversation?
It's called a deduction, not an assumption.And you're the one making general assumptions about an ability
EE on its own already destroys beyond matter, it is essentially super buff deconstruction that leaves nothing behindYou do realize with higher D erasure it doesn't matter what the lower D stuff has, it just by default nukes everything because it essentially sees it in a far lower dimensional plane in the same way we see 2-D drawings as insignificant, that wouldn't grant plot erasure, just higher D erasure, again this is the same thing as arguing people that can erase timelines has matter and deconstruction hax just because it happens to have matter in the timelines.
Sure, boys, scan him. See you when I wake up@Greenshifter Can you actually bring the scans for the Arabian nights world being made only of narratives and nothing else? Because saying "it's accepted" isn't helping when you're not giving me the scans in the first place.
With no scans on hand to prove your point, ok.
Narrative is what the world is made of, this is like arguing for someone that deatroyed a universe to prove that they destroyed the matter in said universeIf you can prove the arabian night world is only capable of being destroyed by the narrative itself being wiped out and nothing else then sure, but I don't see it.
Just give him the scans Bronic…Narrative is what the world is made of, this is like arguing for someone that deatroyed a universe to prove that they destroyed the matter in said universe
We've been actually working on a blog to explain how the Arabian Nights works as an universe, and why that's the case. Here it is: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...ret_Rings:_Fundamentals_of_the_Arabian_NightsI asked when is it remotely stated that the only way to destroy the Arabian world is through the text alone?
But those ways of "destroying" the Arabian Nights are indeed destroying the narrative. Erazor isn't literally burning the pages of a real life book to fulfill his plans, it's just that the word is made of text (as show in the blog) so destroying it and the narrative destroy the world.The fact Erazor Djinn mentions destroying the pages in the book or having Ifrit burn the pages in the book in order to get mess with the world makes the argument that the only way to destroy the Arabian nights world is via affecting the narrative itself complete nonsense to me as more conventional ways of destroying the book is enough.
It is YOUR job when you come after a thread is already concluded demanding for proof when you keep misinterpreting the arguments given again. And again.Me not knowing about the story of the game itself isn’t a point when it’s not my job to research the game, it’s your job as supporters to provide context to people not familiar with the games to begin with.
You have to either A) Enter the book to be transported directly to it's reality, as Sonic did with Shahra or B) Locate/travel to the Arabian Nights within the cosmology itself and destroy it, and we know it's located within the cosmology as Sonic left their reality without assistance from Shahra as he "ran endlessly" going by her dialogue (otherwise we're looking at .TThe fact Erazor Djinn mentions destroying the pages in the book or having Ifrit burn the pages in the book in order to get mess with the world makes the argument that the only way to destroy the Arabian nights world is via affecting the narrative itself complete nonsense to me as more conventional ways of destroying the book is enough.
Bro, if you have no idea what you’re talking about, then you should do the bare minimum amount of research in order to actually validly disagree.Me not knowing about the story of the game itself isn’t a point when it’s not my job to research the game, it’s your job as supporters to provide context to people not familiar with the games to begin with. By this logic no staff input at all would ever be needed since they don’t know every single form of fiction ever, which is a stupid comment to make in the first place.
If this is it then honestly I'm not seeing it. It feels like people are extrapolating a lot based on the aesthetic and presentation of the realm. Like, is there even any information that confirms if someone blasted it normally, it'd be hunky dory?The context is that the Arabian Nights is a realm dictated by, and made up of, pages and text. The stories of the Nights are directly responsible for shaping its space, and without the words there is no world. These texts are baked into the world itself, as shown by how one portion of the world is nothing but pages and text (the Lost Prologue), so destroying the world’s space is synonymous with destroying its plot and narrative.
This tells me that you can affect the realm by affecting the pages and text. It doesn't tell me that an act of destroying the realm is automatically on the narrative level.The only time we see the realm, we see that it is spatially affected by someone absorbing the text of the Nights. And the way the Ifrit Golem is planning to destroy the Nights is by destroying the text and pages that make up the Nights.
Of course, he's entering the world of Arabian stories from reality but like, if I entered a Shakespeare-inspired dimension from here it'd be described the same way.And no, the pages are not an aesthetic thing. They constantly hammer in that the Nights is a story, with the denizens referred to as “characters”, directly name dropping iconic Arabian legends like Aladdin (since Erazor was the genie from Aladdin), and Sonic entering the world is even described as him transitioning from reality into the world of the Arabian stories.
Because you are the one who is saying "it lacks evidence" despite all the others saying it doesn't. Even more so, you think your opinion simply matters more because you are a staff member so you can just pop up in completed threads to stonewall them until your demands are met. Furthermore you confessed that you aren’t knowledgeable on the series, and every staff member who you tagged also isn't. It's just a dick move to pop up in an already accepted thread after a few days, to DEMAND proof for something you don't even know, and then stonewall the thread until you get something you deem "acceptable". If a regular member did this, anyone would ask them to make a new thread with counter-arguments instead, but I guess being a staff member gives you entitlement pass, then.It being accepted or not is irrelevant if what's accepted is lacking in evidence in the first place.
People are saying this because this thread was already accepted and applied, but instead of making a new CRT. If we needed approval to apply this thread, then he would be right to want proof for us. Nobody ever said anything against staff members that aren't knowledgeable being unable to evaluate a thread.Theglassman12 is right that "do your own research" isn't a response you give when asked for context on a feat.