Tie or Loss?

[LlamaGod1411]

Can we reconsider Sasuke's loss against Naruto on his page?

Logically and statistically speaking, Naruto & Sasuke{Ashura & Indra} have always been equal.

For instance, in the valley of the end, in the first fight, the only reason Sasuke survived was the fact that Naruto wasn't going for the kill and the only reason Naruto survived was the Kyuubi's Influence.


In the second battle, while Naruto originally wasn't fighting with the intent to kill, he did everything he could to defend himself, while close to none of Sasuke's defensive capabilities were shown. Once Sasuke started charging up for Indra's Arrow, it took Naruto + A part of all Bijuus's Chakra + Nature Energy of the whole world to just stalemate it, after which both were completely equal in their fight.

The fact that Sasuke "admitted" his loss only alludes to him losing against Naruto's principles and not against Naruto's strengths.

 

[LlamaGod1411]

Bump?

 

[BruceTheBatman]

Naruto won because of the reasons in the thread and his slightly better stats since Sasuke was bloodlusted and therefore stronger than someone actively trying not to kill. If Naruto was bloodlusted he'd win.

 

[LlamaGod1411]

^ Being bloodlusted does not equal using full capabilities.

Naruto was literally attacking Sasuke with everything he has when both of them started off in base.

When Sasuke went PS, Naruto went into Rikudou Mode.

They were pretty much equal all the way.


And the reasons in that thread were terrible. I remember reading one reason as "Sasuke only tied it because he absorbed Naruto's/Kurama's Chakra".

How does that reason even make sense?

 

[BreloomFanboy]

I agree with the OP.

 

[LlamaGod1411]

.