- 2,772
- 1,684
It has been 1 month, 2 weeks and 5 days since this thread's creation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BumpBtw, i don´t think we should consider Grimes' 8-C feat, since the explosion almost freaking killed him and he had to stay at a hospital for months on the "Homer´s Enemy" episode
Bart was knocked out by the lightning, this is showed on the video itself, so i don´t think scale him more than 10 times an attack that knocked him out is a good idea. Also, pretty sure Ned was killed by the lightning strike
Grimey's feat should probably still be included, but under the caviet of an "at most" featFrank Grimes' feat Bump
Bart was knocked out by the lightning, this is showed on the video itself, so i don´t think scale him more than 10 times an attack that knocked him out is a good idea. Also, pretty sure Ned was killed by the lightning strike
The thing is: There is no reason to mantain the feat as a support to High 8-C/8-A if one of the characters was almost killed by the explosionGrimey's feat should probably still be included, but under the caviet of an "at most" feat
I can really say if you are right or not due to my lack of knowledge in relation to this but ok thenAs for the lightning feats, that isn't really because of the 3 gigajoules energy of lightning as we see their bodies are completely unharmed albeit singed most of the time.
You could chalk up Bart getting knocked out or Ned nearly dying due to the durability negating properties of lightning
Additionally, doesn´t lightning becomes far weaker when it starts to get closer to the ground?
Probably not since the energy is transfered upon hitting a target (I also removed the Bart and Ned feat from the original post)Additionally, doesn´t lightning becomes far weaker when it starts to get closer to the ground?
Okay thenProbably not since the energy is transfered upon hitting a target (I also removed the Bart and Ned feat from the original post)
K will add changes and shift from 8-A+ to just 8-A and remove Bart's feat until I get around to calc'ing the inverse sq lawI will just disagree with 8-A+ due to @IDK3465 's reasoning
Both Supersonic calcs got evaluated btwK will add changes and shift from 8-A+ to just 8-A and remove Bart's feat until I get around to calc'ing the inverse sq law
He was only ducking / moving his arm, which would only be reactionsWouldn´t Homer´s Transonic feat also apply to his movement speed and not only his reactions? He clearly moves almost his whole body in tandem with the shoot
"The Great Louse Detective" or the Grimes Jr. episodeAlso, from which episode the feat is?
He also move his head and a part of his bodyHe was only ducking / moving his arm, which would only be reactions
Thanks"The Great Louse Detective" or the Grimes Jr. episode
Wouldn´t Homer´s Transonic feat also apply to his movement speed and not only his reactions? He clearly moves almost his whole body in tandem with the shot
Movement speed / travel speed is stuff like a character running from one location to another. If the event you linked is what's being debated about, it definitely wouldn't count as movement speed under the VS Battles Wiki's definition of "movement speed." Though, obviously, a character visibly reacting to something can still be described as "movement" otherwise.He also move his head and a part of his body
And he didn´t really reacted to the shot in the video, he reacted to the glass breaking and then moved in tadem with the bullet
Fair enoughMovement speed / travel speed is stuff like a character running from one location to another. If the event you linked is what's being debated about, it definitely wouldn't count as movement speed under the VS Battles Wiki's definition of "movement speed." Though, obviously, a character visibly reacting to something can still be described as "movement" otherwise.