• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Simpsons: High 8-C to 8-A, Supersonic+, Intelligence, and Minor revisions

It has been 1 month, 2 weeks and 5 days since this thread's creation.
dfaf558ee8144aa13ea3870279db181f.jpg
 
Btw, i don´t think we should consider Grimes' 8-C feat, since the explosion almost freaking killed him and he had to stay at a hospital for months on the "Homer´s Enemy" episode
Bump

Additionally:
Simpsons characters have also frequently withstanding being shocked by lightning, which is 8-C
Bart was knocked out by the lightning, this is showed on the video itself, so i don´t think scale him more than 10 times an attack that knocked him out is a good idea. Also, pretty sure Ned was killed by the lightning strike

Additionally, doesn´t lightning becomes far weaker when it starts to get closer to the ground?
 
Frank Grimes' feat Bump
Bart was knocked out by the lightning, this is showed on the video itself, so i don´t think scale him more than 10 times an attack that knocked him out is a good idea. Also, pretty sure Ned was killed by the lightning strike
Grimey's feat should probably still be included, but under the caviet of an "at most" feat

As for the lightning feats, that isn't really because of the 3 gigajoules energy of lightning as we see their bodies are completely unharmed albeit singed most of the time.
You could chalk up Bart getting knocked out or Ned nearly dying due to the durability negating properties of lightning
 
Grimey's feat should probably still be included, but under the caviet of an "at most" feat
The thing is: There is no reason to mantain the feat as a support to High 8-C/8-A if one of the characters was almost killed by the explosion

Or 1) You make Homer no longer be comparable to Grimes or 2) You make the explosion an anti-feat and call it a day before the other Tier 8 feats

The second option looks the best to me

As for the lightning feats, that isn't really because of the 3 gigajoules energy of lightning as we see their bodies are completely unharmed albeit singed most of the time.
You could chalk up Bart getting knocked out or Ned nearly dying due to the durability negating properties of lightning
I can really say if you are right or not due to my lack of knowledge in relation to this but ok then

Also, Ned was indeed killed by the lightning

Btw:
Additionally, doesn´t lightning becomes far weaker when it starts to get closer to the ground?
 
Wouldn´t Homer´s Transonic feat also apply to his movement speed and not only his reactions? He clearly moves almost his whole body in tandem with the shot

Also, from which episode the feat is?
 
Last edited:
Wouldn´t Homer´s Transonic feat also apply to his movement speed and not only his reactions? He clearly moves almost his whole body in tandem with the shot
He also move his head and a part of his body

And he didn´t really reacted to the shot in the video, he reacted to the glass breaking and then moved in tadem with the bullet
Movement speed / travel speed is stuff like a character running from one location to another. If the event you linked is what's being debated about, it definitely wouldn't count as movement speed under the VS Battles Wiki's definition of "movement speed." Though, obviously, a character visibly reacting to something can still be described as "movement" otherwise.
 
Back
Top